paperclip/packages/skills-catalog/catalog/bundled/paperclip-operations/issue-triage/SKILL.md

75 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

[codex] Add skills CLI and catalog management (#6782) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through company-scoped control-plane workflows. > - Agents need reusable, inspectable skills that can be installed, reset, audited, exported, and assigned without bespoke local setup. > - The existing skill truth model needed cleanup so bundled skills, optional catalog skills, runtime skills, and adapter-provided skills have clear provenance. > - Operators also need a practical CLI and board UI for discovering and managing company skills. > - This pull request adds the skills CLI, packaged skills catalog, company skills APIs, and catalog-aware board UI. > - The benefit is a more reusable Paperclip company setup where skills are portable, auditable, and easier for operators and agents to manage. ## What Changed - Added `paperclipai skills` CLI commands and coverage for catalog listing, installing, resetting, and inspecting company skills. - Added a packaged `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` workspace with bundled and optional skill content plus validation/build tests. - Added shared company-skill types and validators used across CLI, server, and UI contracts. - Added server catalog APIs/services for company skill catalog operations, reset semantics, audit behavior, and portability provenance. - Updated adapter skill handling so runtime/catalog provenance remains explicit across local adapters. - Added board UI support for browsing and managing catalog-backed company skills. - Updated docs for the skills CLI/catalog flow and the company skills Paperclip skill reference. - Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master`; no `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or migration files are included in the final PR diff. ## Verification - Passed: `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/skills.test.ts packages/skills-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts packages/skills-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/company-skill.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin/src/entrypoints.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-catalog-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts`. - Passed: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t "default branch|origin/master|symbolic-ref"`. - Attempted: full `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts`. Four provisioning tests failed while seeding an isolated worktree database from the local Paperclip instance because the local plugin schema dump contains a duplicate-column foreign key (`plugin_content_machine_18a7bc327b.content_case_signals`). The default-branch tests touched by the rebase conflict passed in the focused run above. - Checked final diff: no `pnpm-lock.yaml`, no `.github/workflows`, and no migration-file changes relative to `master`. ## Risks - Medium: this is a broad skills/catalog change touching CLI, server APIs, shared contracts, adapter skill sync, and UI. - Catalog validation and reset semantics need careful reviewer attention because they affect reusable company setup and portability. - No database migrations are included in this PR, so there is no migration ordering/idempotency risk in the final diff. - No lockfile is included by design; dependency resolution will be handled by the repository lockfile workflow. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, running in Paperclip via the `codex_local` adapter with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and code-editing tool access. Exact hosted model build/context-window metadata is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run targeted tests locally and documented the local workspace-runtime seed failure above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, screenshots were intentionally omitted per PAP-10124 instructions; UI behavior is covered by tests and reviewer inspection - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-28 07:33:51 -10:00
---
name: issue-triage
description: Triage Paperclip inbox issues that are stale, blocked, in-review, or assigned-but-not-progressing, and decide a single next action per issue (resume, reassign, unblock, escalate, or close).
key: paperclipai/bundled/paperclip-operations/issue-triage
recommendedForRoles:
- manager
- ceo
- engineer
tags:
- paperclip
- triage
- inbox
- workflow
---
# Issue Triage
Convert a noisy inbox into a small set of clear next actions. Each pass through this skill should leave every touched issue with a defined owner, status, and the single concrete action that will move it forward.
## When to use
- Daily or shift-start review of `in_progress`, `in_review`, and `blocked` assignments.
- An inbox has many open assignments and no clear priority.
- A manager wants a status read on their reports without asking each agent.
- You are woken by a comment that suggests an old issue stalled.
## When not to use
- You are checked out on one specific issue and the wake context names it. Work that issue, do not triage the whole inbox.
- An issue thread already has an open `request_confirmation` or `ask_user_questions`. Wait for the response — re-triage is noise.
## Inputs
- `GET /api/agents/me/inbox-lite` for the compact assignment list.
- For each candidate issue, `GET /api/issues/{issueId}/heartbeat-context` for compact state including `blockerAttention`, `executionState`, ancestors, and `commentCursor`.
- Only fall back to the full thread when the heartbeat context is not enough.
## Per-issue triage decision
For each issue, classify into exactly one of:
1. **Resume** — execution path is alive. Confirm the assignee is set and let the heartbeat continue. Do not comment.
2. **Wake-needed** — assignee is stalled with no live continuation. Post one comment that names the blocker resolution or the exact next action, then leave `in_progress` or move to `todo` so the assignee picks it up.
3. **Reassign** — the assignee is not the right specialty. Reassign and set `in_review` only if the new assignee is human, otherwise leave `in_progress`.
4. **Unblock** — a first-class `blockedByIssueIds` entry is now `done` or `cancelled`. If `cancelled`, replace or remove it from `blockedByIssueIds`. The blockers-resolved wake will fire automatically when all are `done`.
5. **Escalate** — the issue needs board, CTO, or user input. Create a `request_confirmation`, `ask_user_questions`, or `request_board_approval` and set the issue to `in_review`.
6. **Close** — work is complete, duplicate, or no longer relevant. Set `done` or `cancelled` with a one-line reason.
If you cannot classify in under a minute of reading, escalate rather than guess.
## Stuck-state heuristics
- `in_progress` with no comments or document updates in the last 24h and no monitor or queued continuation → wake-needed.
- `in_review` with no reviewer participant, no pending interaction, no approval — invalid review path → reassign to a real reviewer or move to `todo`.
- `blocked` with no `blockedByIssueIds`, only free-text "blocked by X" → convert to first-class blockers or move to `todo` with a named action.
- `blocked` with all blockers `done` → unblock the issue by setting status back; the assignee will wake.
- Child issues all complete but parent still `in_progress` → confirm parent acceptance, then close.
## Don't-do list
- Do not @-mention agents during triage; mentions cost budget. Use direct reassignment instead.
- Do not re-comment on a `blocked` issue if your most recent comment was also a blocked update with no reply since.
- Do not cancel cross-team issues. Reassign to the responsible manager with a comment.
- Do not change status without a comment that explains the change.
## Output of a triage pass
A short comment chain or summary message that lists, per issue touched:
- Issue id and title.
- Verdict (resume / wake-needed / reassign / unblock / escalate / close).
- The one action you took or asked for.
This is the bar for "the triage is done."