Maintainer runbook for shipping a full Paperclip release across npm, GitHub, and the website-facing changelog surface.
This document is intentionally practical:
- TL;DR command sequences are at the top.
- Detailed checklists come next.
- Motivation, failure handling, and rollback playbooks follow after that.
## Release Surfaces
Every Paperclip release has four separate surfaces:
1.**Verification** — the exact git SHA must pass typecheck, tests, and build.
2.**npm** — `paperclipai` and the public workspace packages are published.
3.**GitHub** — the stable release gets a git tag and a GitHub Release.
4.**Website / announcements** — the stable changelog is published externally and announced.
Treat those as related but separate. npm can succeed while the GitHub Release is still pending. GitHub can be correct while the website changelog is stale. A maintainer release is done only when all four surfaces are handled.
## TL;DR
### Canary release
Use this when you want an installable prerelease without changing `latest`.
claude --print --output-format stream-json --verbose --dangerously-skip-permissions --model claude-opus-4-6 "Use the release-changelog skill to draft or update releases/v${VERSION}.md for Paperclip. Read doc/RELEASING.md and skills/release-changelog/SKILL.md, then generate the stable changelog for v${VERSION} from commits since the last stable tag. Do not create a canary changelog."
If you want to exercise onboarding from a fresh local checkout rather than npm, use:
```bash
./scripts/clean-onboard-git.sh
```
That is not a required release step every time, but it is a useful higher-confidence check when onboarding is the main risk area or when you need to verify what the current codebase does before publishing.
There is also a manual workflow at [`.github/workflows/release.yml`](../.github/workflows/release.yml). It is designed for npm trusted publishing via GitHub OIDC instead of long-lived npm tokens.
Use it from the Actions tab:
1. Choose `Release`
2. Choose `channel`: `canary` or `stable`
3. Choose `bump`: `patch`, `minor`, or `major`
4. Choose whether this is a `dry_run`
5. Run it from `master`
The workflow:
- reruns `typecheck`, `test:run`, and `build`
- gates publish behind the `npm-release` environment
- can publish canaries without touching `latest`
- can publish stable, push the release commit and tag, and create the GitHub Release
## Release Checklist
### Before any publish
- [ ] The working tree is clean, including untracked files
- [ ] The target branch and SHA are the ones you actually want to release
- [ ] The required verification gate passed on that exact SHA
- [ ] The bump type is correct for the user-visible impact
- [ ] The stable changelog file exists or is ready to be written at `releases/vX.Y.Z.md`
- [ ] You know which previous stable version you would roll back to if needed
### Before a canary
- [ ] You are intentionally testing something that should be installable before it becomes default
- [ ] You are comfortable with users installing it via `npx paperclipai@canary onboard`
- [ ] You understand that each canary is a new immutable npm version such as `1.2.3-canary.1`
### Before a stable
- [ ] The candidate has already passed smoke testing
- [ ] The changelog should be the stable version only, for example `v1.2.3`
- [ ] You are ready to push the release commit and tag immediately after npm publish
- [ ] You are ready to create the GitHub Release immediately after the push
- [ ] You have a post-release website / announcement plan
### After a stable
- [ ]`npm view paperclipai@latest version` matches the new stable version
- [ ] The git tag exists on GitHub
- [ ] The GitHub Release exists and uses `releases/vX.Y.Z.md`
- [ ] The website changelog is updated
- [ ] Any announcement copy matches the shipped release, not the canary
## Verification Gate
The repository standard is:
```bash
pnpm -r typecheck
pnpm test:run
pnpm build
```
This matches [`.github/workflows/pr-verify.yml`](../.github/workflows/pr-verify.yml). Run it before claiming a release candidate is ready.
claude -p "Use the release-changelog skill to draft or update releases/v${VERSION}.md for Paperclip. Read doc/RELEASING.md and skills/release-changelog/SKILL.md, then generate the stable changelog for v${VERSION} from commits since the last stable tag. Do not create a canary changelog."
- [ ] basic company creation and dashboard load work
### 5. Publish stable from the vetted commit
Once the candidate SHA is good, run the stable flow on that exact commit:
```bash
./scripts/release.sh <patch|minor|major>
```
What the script does:
1. Verifies the working tree is clean
2. Versions the public packages to the stable semver
3. Builds the workspace and CLI publish bundle
4. Publishes to npm under `latest`
5. Restores temporary publish artifacts
6. Creates the local release commit and git tag
What it does **not** do:
- it does not push for you
- it does not update the website
- it does not announce the release for you
### 6. Push the release and create the GitHub Release
After a stable publish succeeds:
```bash
git push origin HEAD:master --follow-tags
./scripts/create-github-release.sh X.Y.Z
```
The GitHub release notes come from:
-`releases/vX.Y.Z.md`
### 7. Complete the external surfaces
After GitHub is correct:
- publish the changelog on the website
- write the announcement copy
- ensure public docs and install guidance point to the stable version
## GitHub Actions and npm Trusted Publishing
If you want GitHub to own the actual npm publish, use [`.github/workflows/release.yml`](../.github/workflows/release.yml) together with npm trusted publishing.
Recommended setup:
1. Configure the GitHub Actions workflow as a trusted publisher for **every public package** on npm
2. Use the `npm-release` GitHub environment with required reviewers
3. Run stable publishes from `master` only
4. Keep the workflow manual via `workflow_dispatch`
Why this is the right shape:
- no long-lived npm token needs to live in GitHub secrets
- reviewers can approve the publish step at the environment gate
- the workflow reruns verification on the release SHA before publish
- stable and canary use the same mechanics
## Failure Playbooks
### If the canary fails before publish
Nothing shipped. Fix the code and rerun the canary workflow.
### If the canary publishes but the smoke test fails
Do **not** publish stable.
Instead:
1. Fix the issue
2. Publish another canary
3. Re-run smoke testing
The canary version number will increase, but the stable target version can remain the same.
### If the stable npm publish succeeds but push fails
This is a partial release. npm is already live.
Do this immediately:
1. Fix the git issue
2. Push the release commit and tag from the same checkout
3. Create the GitHub Release
Do **not** publish the same version again.
### If the stable release is bad after `latest` moves
Use the rollback script first:
```bash
./scripts/rollback-latest.sh <last-good-version>
```
Then:
1. open an incident note or maintainer comment
2. fix forward on a new patch release
3. update the changelog / release notes if the user-facing guidance changed
### If the GitHub Release is wrong
Edit it by re-running:
```bash
./scripts/create-github-release.sh X.Y.Z
```
This updates the release notes if the GitHub Release already exists.
### If the website changelog is wrong
Fix the website independently. Do not republish npm just to repair the website surface.
## Rollback Strategy
The default rollback strategy is **dist-tag rollback, then fix forward**.
Why:
- npm versions are immutable
- users need `npx paperclipai onboard` to recover quickly
- moving `latest` back is faster and safer than trying to delete history
Rollback procedure:
1. identify the last known good stable version
2. run `./scripts/rollback-latest.sh <version>`
3. verify `npm view paperclipai@latest version`
4. fix forward with a new stable release
## Scripts Reference
- [`scripts/release.sh`](../scripts/release.sh) — stable and canary npm publish flow