2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
import fs from "node:fs/promises";
|
|
|
|
|
import os from "node:os";
|
|
|
|
|
import path from "node:path";
|
|
|
|
|
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
|
import { ensureCodexSkillsInjected } from "@paperclipai/adapter-codex-local/server";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
async function makeTempDir(prefix: string): Promise<string> {
|
|
|
|
|
return fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), prefix));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
async function createPaperclipRepoSkill(root: string, skillName: string) {
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.mkdir(path.join(root, "server"), { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.mkdir(path.join(root, "packages", "adapter-utils"), { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.mkdir(path.join(root, "skills", skillName), { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.writeFile(path.join(root, "pnpm-workspace.yaml"), "packages:\n - packages/*\n", "utf8");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.writeFile(path.join(root, "package.json"), '{"name":"paperclip"}\n', "utf8");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.writeFile(
|
|
|
|
|
path.join(root, "skills", skillName, "SKILL.md"),
|
|
|
|
|
`---\nname: ${skillName}\n---\n`,
|
|
|
|
|
"utf8",
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
async function createCustomSkill(root: string, skillName: string) {
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.mkdir(path.join(root, "custom", skillName), { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.writeFile(
|
|
|
|
|
path.join(root, "custom", skillName, "SKILL.md"),
|
|
|
|
|
`---\nname: ${skillName}\n---\n`,
|
|
|
|
|
"utf8",
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe("codex local adapter skill injection", () => {
|
2026-03-16 18:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
const paperclipKey = "paperclipai/paperclip/paperclip";
|
[codex] Harden create-agent skill governance (#4422)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Hiring agents is a governance-sensitive workflow because it grants
roles, adapter config, skills, and execution capability
> - The create-agent skill needs explicit templates and review guidance
so hires are auditable and not over-permissioned
> - Skill sync also needs to recognize bundled Paperclip skills
consistently for Codex local agents
> - This pull request expands create-agent role templates, adds a
security-engineer template, and documents capability/secret-handling
review requirements
> - The benefit is safer, more repeatable agent creation with clearer
approval payloads and less permission sprawl
## What Changed
- Expanded `paperclip-create-agent` guidance for template selection,
adjacent-template drafting, and role-specific review bars.
- Added a Security Engineer agent template and collaboration/safety
sections for Coder, QA, and UX Designer templates.
- Hardened draft-review guidance around desired skills, external-system
access, secrets, and confidential advisory handling.
- Updated LLM agent-configuration guidance to point hiring workflows at
the create-agent skill.
- Added tests for bundled skill sync, create-agent skill injection, hire
approval payloads, and LLM route guidance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-injection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-sync.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/llms-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts --config
server/vitest.config.ts` passed: 5 files, 23 tests.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-create-agent-governance
-- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Low-to-medium risk: this primarily changes skills/docs and tests, but
it affects future hiring guidance and approval expectations.
- Reviewers should check whether the new Security Engineer template is
too broad for default company installs.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable; this PR changes
skills, docs, and server tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 14:15:28 -05:00
|
|
|
const createAgentKey = "paperclipai/paperclip/paperclip-create-agent";
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
const cleanupDirs = new Set<string>();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
await Promise.all(Array.from(cleanupDirs).map((dir) => fs.rm(dir, { recursive: true, force: true })));
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.clear();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("repairs a Codex Paperclip skill symlink that still points at another live checkout", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const currentRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-current-");
|
|
|
|
|
const oldRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-old-");
|
|
|
|
|
const skillsHome = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-home-");
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(currentRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(oldRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(skillsHome);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "paperclip");
|
[codex] Harden create-agent skill governance (#4422)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Hiring agents is a governance-sensitive workflow because it grants
roles, adapter config, skills, and execution capability
> - The create-agent skill needs explicit templates and review guidance
so hires are auditable and not over-permissioned
> - Skill sync also needs to recognize bundled Paperclip skills
consistently for Codex local agents
> - This pull request expands create-agent role templates, adds a
security-engineer template, and documents capability/secret-handling
review requirements
> - The benefit is safer, more repeatable agent creation with clearer
approval payloads and less permission sprawl
## What Changed
- Expanded `paperclip-create-agent` guidance for template selection,
adjacent-template drafting, and role-specific review bars.
- Added a Security Engineer agent template and collaboration/safety
sections for Coder, QA, and UX Designer templates.
- Hardened draft-review guidance around desired skills, external-system
access, secrets, and confidential advisory handling.
- Updated LLM agent-configuration guidance to point hiring workflows at
the create-agent skill.
- Added tests for bundled skill sync, create-agent skill injection, hire
approval payloads, and LLM route guidance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-injection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-sync.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/llms-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts --config
server/vitest.config.ts` passed: 5 files, 23 tests.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-create-agent-governance
-- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Low-to-medium risk: this primarily changes skills/docs and tests, but
it affects future hiring guidance and approval expectations.
- Reviewers should check whether the new Security Engineer template is
too broad for default company installs.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable; this PR changes
skills, docs, and server tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 14:15:28 -05:00
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "paperclip-create-agent");
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(oldRepo, "paperclip");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.symlink(path.join(oldRepo, "skills", "paperclip"), path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-16 18:09:43 -05:00
|
|
|
const logs: Array<{ stream: "stdout" | "stderr"; chunk: string }> = [];
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
await ensureCodexSkillsInjected(
|
2026-03-16 18:09:43 -05:00
|
|
|
async (stream, chunk) => {
|
|
|
|
|
logs.push({ stream, chunk });
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
skillsHome,
|
[codex] Harden create-agent skill governance (#4422)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Hiring agents is a governance-sensitive workflow because it grants
roles, adapter config, skills, and execution capability
> - The create-agent skill needs explicit templates and review guidance
so hires are auditable and not over-permissioned
> - Skill sync also needs to recognize bundled Paperclip skills
consistently for Codex local agents
> - This pull request expands create-agent role templates, adds a
security-engineer template, and documents capability/secret-handling
review requirements
> - The benefit is safer, more repeatable agent creation with clearer
approval payloads and less permission sprawl
## What Changed
- Expanded `paperclip-create-agent` guidance for template selection,
adjacent-template drafting, and role-specific review bars.
- Added a Security Engineer agent template and collaboration/safety
sections for Coder, QA, and UX Designer templates.
- Hardened draft-review guidance around desired skills, external-system
access, secrets, and confidential advisory handling.
- Updated LLM agent-configuration guidance to point hiring workflows at
the create-agent skill.
- Added tests for bundled skill sync, create-agent skill injection, hire
approval payloads, and LLM route guidance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-injection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-sync.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/llms-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts --config
server/vitest.config.ts` passed: 5 files, 23 tests.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-create-agent-governance
-- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Low-to-medium risk: this primarily changes skills/docs and tests, but
it affects future hiring guidance and approval expectations.
- Reviewers should check whether the new Security Engineer template is
too broad for default company installs.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable; this PR changes
skills, docs, and server tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 14:15:28 -05:00
|
|
|
skillsEntries: [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
key: paperclipKey,
|
|
|
|
|
runtimeName: "paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
source: path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
key: createAgentKey,
|
|
|
|
|
runtimeName: "paperclip-create-agent",
|
|
|
|
|
source: path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip-create-agent"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(await fs.realpath(path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip"))).toBe(
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.realpath(path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip")),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
[codex] Harden create-agent skill governance (#4422)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Hiring agents is a governance-sensitive workflow because it grants
roles, adapter config, skills, and execution capability
> - The create-agent skill needs explicit templates and review guidance
so hires are auditable and not over-permissioned
> - Skill sync also needs to recognize bundled Paperclip skills
consistently for Codex local agents
> - This pull request expands create-agent role templates, adds a
security-engineer template, and documents capability/secret-handling
review requirements
> - The benefit is safer, more repeatable agent creation with clearer
approval payloads and less permission sprawl
## What Changed
- Expanded `paperclip-create-agent` guidance for template selection,
adjacent-template drafting, and role-specific review bars.
- Added a Security Engineer agent template and collaboration/safety
sections for Coder, QA, and UX Designer templates.
- Hardened draft-review guidance around desired skills, external-system
access, secrets, and confidential advisory handling.
- Updated LLM agent-configuration guidance to point hiring workflows at
the create-agent skill.
- Added tests for bundled skill sync, create-agent skill injection, hire
approval payloads, and LLM route guidance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-injection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-sync.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/llms-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts --config
server/vitest.config.ts` passed: 5 files, 23 tests.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-create-agent-governance
-- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Low-to-medium risk: this primarily changes skills/docs and tests, but
it affects future hiring guidance and approval expectations.
- Reviewers should check whether the new Security Engineer template is
too broad for default company installs.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable; this PR changes
skills, docs, and server tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 14:15:28 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(await fs.realpath(path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip-create-agent"))).toBe(
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.realpath(path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip-create-agent")),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
2026-03-16 18:09:43 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(logs).toContainEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
stream: "stdout",
|
|
|
|
|
chunk: expect.stringContaining('Repaired Codex skill "paperclip"'),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
[codex] Harden create-agent skill governance (#4422)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Hiring agents is a governance-sensitive workflow because it grants
roles, adapter config, skills, and execution capability
> - The create-agent skill needs explicit templates and review guidance
so hires are auditable and not over-permissioned
> - Skill sync also needs to recognize bundled Paperclip skills
consistently for Codex local agents
> - This pull request expands create-agent role templates, adds a
security-engineer template, and documents capability/secret-handling
review requirements
> - The benefit is safer, more repeatable agent creation with clearer
approval payloads and less permission sprawl
## What Changed
- Expanded `paperclip-create-agent` guidance for template selection,
adjacent-template drafting, and role-specific review bars.
- Added a Security Engineer agent template and collaboration/safety
sections for Coder, QA, and UX Designer templates.
- Hardened draft-review guidance around desired skills, external-system
access, secrets, and confidential advisory handling.
- Updated LLM agent-configuration guidance to point hiring workflows at
the create-agent skill.
- Added tests for bundled skill sync, create-agent skill injection, hire
approval payloads, and LLM route guidance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-injection.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/codex-local-skill-sync.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/llms-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts --config
server/vitest.config.ts` passed: 5 files, 23 tests.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-create-agent-governance
-- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Low-to-medium risk: this primarily changes skills/docs and tests, but
it affects future hiring guidance and approval expectations.
- Reviewers should check whether the new Security Engineer template is
too broad for default company installs.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable; this PR changes
skills, docs, and server tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 14:15:28 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(logs).toContainEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
stream: "stdout",
|
|
|
|
|
chunk: expect.stringContaining('Injected Codex skill "paperclip-create-agent"'),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("preserves a custom Codex skill symlink outside Paperclip repo checkouts", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const currentRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-current-");
|
|
|
|
|
const customRoot = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-custom-");
|
|
|
|
|
const skillsHome = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-home-");
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(currentRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(customRoot);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(skillsHome);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "paperclip");
|
|
|
|
|
await createCustomSkill(customRoot, "paperclip");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.symlink(path.join(customRoot, "custom", "paperclip"), path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await ensureCodexSkillsInjected(async () => {}, {
|
|
|
|
|
skillsHome,
|
2026-03-16 18:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
skillsEntries: [{
|
|
|
|
|
key: paperclipKey,
|
|
|
|
|
runtimeName: "paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
source: path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip"),
|
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(await fs.realpath(path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip"))).toBe(
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.realpath(path.join(customRoot, "custom", "paperclip")),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-03-18 14:07:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("prunes broken symlinks for unavailable Paperclip repo skills before Codex starts", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const currentRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-current-");
|
|
|
|
|
const oldRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-old-");
|
|
|
|
|
const skillsHome = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-home-");
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(currentRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(oldRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(skillsHome);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "paperclip");
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(oldRepo, "agent-browser");
|
|
|
|
|
const staleTarget = path.join(oldRepo, "skills", "agent-browser");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.symlink(staleTarget, path.join(skillsHome, "agent-browser"));
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.rm(staleTarget, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const logs: Array<{ stream: "stdout" | "stderr"; chunk: string }> = [];
|
|
|
|
|
await ensureCodexSkillsInjected(
|
|
|
|
|
async (stream, chunk) => {
|
|
|
|
|
logs.push({ stream, chunk });
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
skillsHome,
|
|
|
|
|
skillsEntries: [{
|
|
|
|
|
key: paperclipKey,
|
|
|
|
|
runtimeName: "paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
source: path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip"),
|
|
|
|
|
}],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await expect(fs.lstat(path.join(skillsHome, "agent-browser"))).rejects.toMatchObject({
|
|
|
|
|
code: "ENOENT",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
expect(logs).toContainEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
stream: "stdout",
|
|
|
|
|
chunk: expect.stringContaining('Removed stale Codex skill "agent-browser"'),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-03-19 07:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("preserves other live Paperclip skill symlinks in the shared workspace skill directory", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const currentRepo = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-current-");
|
|
|
|
|
const skillsHome = await makeTempDir("paperclip-codex-home-");
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(currentRepo);
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupDirs.add(skillsHome);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "paperclip");
|
|
|
|
|
await createPaperclipRepoSkill(currentRepo, "agent-browser");
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.symlink(
|
|
|
|
|
path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "agent-browser"),
|
|
|
|
|
path.join(skillsHome, "agent-browser"),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await ensureCodexSkillsInjected(async () => {}, {
|
|
|
|
|
skillsHome,
|
|
|
|
|
skillsEntries: [{
|
|
|
|
|
key: paperclipKey,
|
|
|
|
|
runtimeName: "paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
source: path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "paperclip"),
|
|
|
|
|
}],
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect((await fs.lstat(path.join(skillsHome, "paperclip"))).isSymbolicLink()).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect((await fs.lstat(path.join(skillsHome, "agent-browser"))).isSymbolicLink()).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(await fs.realpath(path.join(skillsHome, "agent-browser"))).toBe(
|
|
|
|
|
await fs.realpath(path.join(currentRepo, "skills", "agent-browser")),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-03-13 11:53:56 -05:00
|
|
|
});
|