paperclip/server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts

132 lines
4.6 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { models as codexFallbackModels } from "@paperclipai/adapter-codex-local";
import { models as cursorFallbackModels } from "@paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local";
import { models as opencodeFallbackModels } from "@paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local";
import { resetOpenCodeModelsCacheForTests } from "@paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local/server";
[codex] Improve transient recovery and Codex model refresh (#4383) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Adapter execution and retry classification decide whether agent work pauses, retries, or recovers automatically > - Transient provider failures need to be classified precisely so Paperclip does not convert retryable upstream conditions into false hard failures > - At the same time, operators need an up-to-date model list for Codex-backed agents and prompts should nudge agents toward targeted verification instead of repo-wide sweeps > - This pull request tightens transient recovery classification for Claude and Codex, updates the agent prompt guidance, and adds Codex model refresh support end-to-end > - The benefit is better automatic retry behavior plus fresher operator-facing model configuration ## What Changed - added Codex usage-limit retry-window parsing and Claude extra-usage transient classification - normalized the heartbeat transient-recovery contract across adapter executions and heartbeat scheduling - documented that deferred comment wakes only reopen completed issues for human/comment-reopen interactions, while system follow-ups leave closed work closed - updated adapter-utils prompt guidance to prefer targeted verification - added Codex model refresh support in the server route, registry, shared types, and agent config form - added adapter/server tests covering the new parsing, retry scheduling, and model-refresh behavior ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/parse.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/parse.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/adapter-model-refresh-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts server/src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/codex-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts` ## Risks - Moderate behavior risk: retry classification affects whether runs auto-recover or block, so mistakes here could either suppress needed retries or over-retry real failures - Low workflow risk: deferred comment wake reopening is intentionally scoped to human/comment-reopen interactions so system follow-ups do not revive completed issues unexpectedly > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex GPT-5-based coding agent with tool use and code execution in the Codex CLI environment ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 09:40:40 -05:00
import { listAdapterModels, refreshAdapterModels } from "../adapters/index.js";
import { resetCodexModelsCacheForTests } from "../adapters/codex-models.js";
import { resetCursorModelsCacheForTests, setCursorModelsRunnerForTests } from "../adapters/cursor-models.js";
describe("adapter model listing", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
delete process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY;
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_COMMAND;
resetCodexModelsCacheForTests();
resetCursorModelsCacheForTests();
setCursorModelsRunnerForTests(null);
resetOpenCodeModelsCacheForTests();
vi.restoreAllMocks();
});
it("returns an empty list for unknown adapters", async () => {
const models = await listAdapterModels("unknown_adapter");
expect(models).toEqual([]);
});
it("returns codex fallback models when no OpenAI key is available", async () => {
const fetchSpy = vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch");
const models = await listAdapterModels("codex_local");
expect(models).toEqual(codexFallbackModels);
expect(fetchSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("loads codex models dynamically and merges fallback options", async () => {
process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY = "sk-test";
const fetchSpy = vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch").mockResolvedValue({
ok: true,
json: async () => ({
data: [
{ id: "gpt-5-pro" },
{ id: "gpt-5" },
],
}),
} as Response);
const first = await listAdapterModels("codex_local");
const second = await listAdapterModels("codex_local");
expect(fetchSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(first).toEqual(second);
expect(first.some((model) => model.id === "gpt-5-pro")).toBe(true);
expect(first.some((model) => model.id === "codex-mini-latest")).toBe(true);
});
[codex] Improve transient recovery and Codex model refresh (#4383) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Adapter execution and retry classification decide whether agent work pauses, retries, or recovers automatically > - Transient provider failures need to be classified precisely so Paperclip does not convert retryable upstream conditions into false hard failures > - At the same time, operators need an up-to-date model list for Codex-backed agents and prompts should nudge agents toward targeted verification instead of repo-wide sweeps > - This pull request tightens transient recovery classification for Claude and Codex, updates the agent prompt guidance, and adds Codex model refresh support end-to-end > - The benefit is better automatic retry behavior plus fresher operator-facing model configuration ## What Changed - added Codex usage-limit retry-window parsing and Claude extra-usage transient classification - normalized the heartbeat transient-recovery contract across adapter executions and heartbeat scheduling - documented that deferred comment wakes only reopen completed issues for human/comment-reopen interactions, while system follow-ups leave closed work closed - updated adapter-utils prompt guidance to prefer targeted verification - added Codex model refresh support in the server route, registry, shared types, and agent config form - added adapter/server tests covering the new parsing, retry scheduling, and model-refresh behavior ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/parse.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/parse.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/adapter-model-refresh-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts server/src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/codex-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts` ## Risks - Moderate behavior risk: retry classification affects whether runs auto-recover or block, so mistakes here could either suppress needed retries or over-retry real failures - Low workflow risk: deferred comment wake reopening is intentionally scoped to human/comment-reopen interactions so system follow-ups do not revive completed issues unexpectedly > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex GPT-5-based coding agent with tool use and code execution in the Codex CLI environment ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 09:40:40 -05:00
it("refreshes cached codex models on demand", async () => {
process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY = "sk-test";
const fetchSpy = vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch")
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
ok: true,
json: async () => ({
data: [{ id: "gpt-5" }],
}),
} as Response)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
ok: true,
json: async () => ({
data: [{ id: "gpt-5.5" }],
}),
} as Response);
const initial = await listAdapterModels("codex_local");
const refreshed = await refreshAdapterModels("codex_local");
expect(fetchSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(initial.some((model) => model.id === "gpt-5")).toBe(true);
expect(refreshed.some((model) => model.id === "gpt-5.5")).toBe(true);
});
it("falls back to static codex models when OpenAI model discovery fails", async () => {
process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY = "sk-test";
vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch").mockResolvedValue({
ok: false,
status: 401,
json: async () => ({}),
} as Response);
const models = await listAdapterModels("codex_local");
expect(models).toEqual(codexFallbackModels);
});
it("returns cursor fallback models when CLI discovery is unavailable", async () => {
setCursorModelsRunnerForTests(() => ({
status: null,
stdout: "",
stderr: "",
hasError: true,
}));
const models = await listAdapterModels("cursor");
expect(models).toEqual(cursorFallbackModels);
});
it("returns opencode fallback models including gpt-5.4", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_COMMAND = "__paperclip_missing_opencode_command__";
const models = await listAdapterModels("opencode_local");
expect(models).toEqual(opencodeFallbackModels);
});
it("loads cursor models dynamically and caches them", async () => {
const runner = vi.fn(() => ({
status: 0,
stdout: "Available models: auto, composer-1.5, gpt-5.3-codex-high, sonnet-4.6",
stderr: "",
hasError: false,
}));
setCursorModelsRunnerForTests(runner);
const first = await listAdapterModels("cursor");
const second = await listAdapterModels("cursor");
expect(runner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(first).toEqual(second);
expect(first.some((model) => model.id === "auto")).toBe(true);
expect(first.some((model) => model.id === "gpt-5.3-codex-high")).toBe(true);
expect(first.some((model) => model.id === "composer-1")).toBe(true);
});
});