2026-03-28 10:04:46 -05:00
|
|
|
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
import type { Issue } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
import {
|
[codex] Polish issue board workflows (#4224)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Human operators supervise that work through issue lists, issue
detail, comments, inbox groups, markdown references, and
profile/activity surfaces
> - The branch had many small UI fixes that improve the operator loop
but do not need to ship with backend runtime migrations
> - These changes belong together as board workflow polish because they
affect scanning, navigation, issue context, comment state, and markdown
clarity
> - This pull request groups the UI-only slice so it can merge
independently from runtime/backend changes
> - The benefit is a clearer board experience with better issue context,
steadier optimistic updates, and more predictable keyboard navigation
## What Changed
- Improves issue properties, sub-issue actions, blocker chips, and issue
list/detail refresh behavior.
- Adds blocker context above the issue composer and stabilizes
queued/interrupted comment UI state.
- Improves markdown issue/GitHub link rendering and opens external
markdown links in a new tab.
- Adds inbox group keyboard navigation and fold/unfold support.
- Polishes activity/avatar/profile/settings/workspace presentation
details.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/lib/optimistic-issue-comments.test.ts`
## Risks
- Low to medium risk: changes are UI-focused but cover high-traffic
issue and inbox surfaces.
- This branch intentionally does not include the backend runtime changes
from the companion PR; where UI calls newer API filters, unsupported
servers should continue to fail visibly through existing API error
handling.
- Visual screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; targeted
component/helper tests cover the changed behavior.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, shell/git tool use
enabled. Exact hosted model build and context window are not exposed in
this Paperclip heartbeat environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-04-21 12:25:34 -05:00
|
|
|
applyLocalQueuedIssueCommentState,
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
applyOptimisticIssueFieldUpdate,
|
|
|
|
|
applyOptimisticIssueFieldUpdateToCollection,
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
applyOptimisticIssueCommentUpdate,
|
|
|
|
|
createOptimisticIssueComment,
|
2026-04-08 17:22:52 -05:00
|
|
|
flattenIssueCommentPages,
|
2026-04-09 06:12:43 -05:00
|
|
|
getNextIssueCommentPageParam,
|
2026-03-28 11:25:25 -05:00
|
|
|
isQueuedIssueComment,
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
matchesIssueRef,
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
mergeIssueComments,
|
[codex] Improve issue detail and issue-list UX (#3678)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A core part of that is the operator experience around reading issue
state, agent chat, and sub-task structure
> - The current branch had a long run of issue-detail and issue-list UX
fixes that all improve how humans follow and steer active work
> - Those changes mostly live in the UI/chat surface and should be
reviewed together instead of mixed with workspace/runtime work
> - This pull request packages the issue-detail, chat, markdown, and
sub-issue list improvements into one standalone change
> - The benefit is a cleaner, less jumpy, more reliable issue workflow
on desktop and mobile without coupling it to unrelated server/runtime
refactors
## What Changed
- Stabilized issue chat runtime wiring, optimistic comment handling,
queued-comment cancellation, and composer anchoring during live updates
- Fixed several issue-detail rendering and navigation regressions
including placeholder bleed, local polling scope, mobile inbox-to-issue
transitions, and visible refresh resets
- Improved markdown and rich-content handling with advisory image
normalization, editor fallback behavior, touch mention recovery, and
`issue:` quicklook links
- Refined sub-issue behavior with parent-derived defaults, current-user
inheritance fixes, empty-state cleanup, and a reusable issue-list
presentation for sub-issues
- Added targeted UI tests for the new issue-detail, chat scroll/message,
placeholder-data, markdown, and issue-list behaviors
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-scroll.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts
ui/src/lib/query-placeholder-data.test.tsx
ui/src/hooks/usePaperclipIssueRuntime.test.tsx`
## Risks
- Medium: this branch touches the highest-traffic issue-detail UI paths,
so regressions would show up as chat/thread or sub-issue UX glitches
- The changes are UI-heavy and would benefit from reviewer screenshots
or a quick manual browser pass before merge
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 12:50:48 -05:00
|
|
|
removeIssueCommentFromPages,
|
|
|
|
|
takeOptimisticIssueComment,
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
upsertIssueComment,
|
2026-04-08 17:22:52 -05:00
|
|
|
upsertIssueCommentInPages,
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
} from "./optimistic-issue-comments";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe("optimistic issue comments", () => {
|
2026-03-28 10:04:46 -05:00
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
|
|
|
vi.unstubAllGlobals();
|
|
|
|
|
vi.restoreAllMocks();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
it("creates a pending optimistic comment for the current user", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = createOptimisticIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Working on it",
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.id).toMatch(/^optimistic-/);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.clientId).toBe(comment.id);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.clientStatus).toBe("pending");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.authorUserId).toBe("board-1");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.authorAgentId).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 10:04:46 -05:00
|
|
|
it("falls back when crypto.randomUUID is unavailable", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
vi.stubGlobal("crypto", {});
|
|
|
|
|
const nowSpy = vi.spyOn(Date, "now").mockReturnValue(1_746_000_000_000);
|
|
|
|
|
const mathSpy = vi.spyOn(Math, "random").mockReturnValue(0.123456789);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = createOptimisticIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Working on it",
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.id).toBe("optimistic-1746000000000-4fzzzxjy");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.clientId).toBe(comment.id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nowSpy.mockRestore();
|
|
|
|
|
mathSpy.mockRestore();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 11:25:25 -05:00
|
|
|
it("supports queued optimistic comments for active-run follow-ups", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = createOptimisticIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Queue this",
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientStatus: "queued",
|
|
|
|
|
queueTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.clientStatus).toBe("queued");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(comment.queueTargetRunId).toBe("run-1");
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
it("merges optimistic comments into the server thread in chronological order", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const merged = mergeIssueComments(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Second",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "optimistic-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientId: "optimistic-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientStatus: "pending",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "First",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(merged.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["optimistic-1", "comment-2"]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
[codex] Improve issue detail and issue-list UX (#3678)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A core part of that is the operator experience around reading issue
state, agent chat, and sub-task structure
> - The current branch had a long run of issue-detail and issue-list UX
fixes that all improve how humans follow and steer active work
> - Those changes mostly live in the UI/chat surface and should be
reviewed together instead of mixed with workspace/runtime work
> - This pull request packages the issue-detail, chat, markdown, and
sub-issue list improvements into one standalone change
> - The benefit is a cleaner, less jumpy, more reliable issue workflow
on desktop and mobile without coupling it to unrelated server/runtime
refactors
## What Changed
- Stabilized issue chat runtime wiring, optimistic comment handling,
queued-comment cancellation, and composer anchoring during live updates
- Fixed several issue-detail rendering and navigation regressions
including placeholder bleed, local polling scope, mobile inbox-to-issue
transitions, and visible refresh resets
- Improved markdown and rich-content handling with advisory image
normalization, editor fallback behavior, touch mention recovery, and
`issue:` quicklook links
- Refined sub-issue behavior with parent-derived defaults, current-user
inheritance fixes, empty-state cleanup, and a reusable issue-list
presentation for sub-issues
- Added targeted UI tests for the new issue-detail, chat scroll/message,
placeholder-data, markdown, and issue-list behaviors
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-scroll.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts
ui/src/lib/query-placeholder-data.test.tsx
ui/src/hooks/usePaperclipIssueRuntime.test.tsx`
## Risks
- Medium: this branch touches the highest-traffic issue-detail UI paths,
so regressions would show up as chat/thread or sub-issue UX glitches
- The changes are UI-heavy and would benefit from reviewer screenshots
or a quick manual browser pass before merge
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 12:50:48 -05:00
|
|
|
it("can take one optimistic queued comment back out of the queue", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const first = createOptimisticIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "First",
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientStatus: "queued",
|
|
|
|
|
queueTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
const second = createOptimisticIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Second",
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientStatus: "queued",
|
|
|
|
|
queueTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const result = takeOptimisticIssueComment([first, second], first.clientId);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.comment?.body).toBe("First");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.comments.map((comment) => comment.clientId)).toEqual([second.clientId]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
it("upserts confirmed comments without creating duplicates", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const next = upsertIssueComment(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Original",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Updated",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next[0]?.body).toBe("Updated");
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-08 17:22:52 -05:00
|
|
|
it("flattens paged comments into one chronological thread", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const flattened = flattenIssueCommentPages([
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-3",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Newest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Oldest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Middle",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(flattened.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["comment-1", "comment-2", "comment-3"]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-09 06:12:43 -05:00
|
|
|
it("returns no next page param when the last page is missing", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(getNextIssueCommentPageParam(undefined, 50)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("returns the oldest id when the last page is full", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
getNextIssueCommentPageParam(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Second",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "First",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
2,
|
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe("comment-1");
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-08 17:22:52 -05:00
|
|
|
it("upserts paged comments without dropping older pages", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const nextPages = upsertIssueCommentInPages(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-3",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Newest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Oldest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-4",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Brand new",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:04.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:04.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(nextPages[0]?.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["comment-4", "comment-3"]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(nextPages[1]?.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["comment-1"]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
[codex] Improve issue detail and issue-list UX (#3678)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A core part of that is the operator experience around reading issue
state, agent chat, and sub-task structure
> - The current branch had a long run of issue-detail and issue-list UX
fixes that all improve how humans follow and steer active work
> - Those changes mostly live in the UI/chat surface and should be
reviewed together instead of mixed with workspace/runtime work
> - This pull request packages the issue-detail, chat, markdown, and
sub-issue list improvements into one standalone change
> - The benefit is a cleaner, less jumpy, more reliable issue workflow
on desktop and mobile without coupling it to unrelated server/runtime
refactors
## What Changed
- Stabilized issue chat runtime wiring, optimistic comment handling,
queued-comment cancellation, and composer anchoring during live updates
- Fixed several issue-detail rendering and navigation regressions
including placeholder bleed, local polling scope, mobile inbox-to-issue
transitions, and visible refresh resets
- Improved markdown and rich-content handling with advisory image
normalization, editor fallback behavior, touch mention recovery, and
`issue:` quicklook links
- Refined sub-issue behavior with parent-derived defaults, current-user
inheritance fixes, empty-state cleanup, and a reusable issue-list
presentation for sub-issues
- Added targeted UI tests for the new issue-detail, chat scroll/message,
placeholder-data, markdown, and issue-list behaviors
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-scroll.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts
ui/src/lib/query-placeholder-data.test.tsx
ui/src/hooks/usePaperclipIssueRuntime.test.tsx`
## Risks
- Medium: this branch touches the highest-traffic issue-detail UI paths,
so regressions would show up as chat/thread or sub-issue UX glitches
- The changes are UI-heavy and would benefit from reviewer screenshots
or a quick manual browser pass before merge
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 12:50:48 -05:00
|
|
|
it("removes a confirmed queued comment from paged caches", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const nextPages = removeIssueCommentFromPages(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-3",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Newest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:03.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Middle",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:02.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Oldest",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:01.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
"comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(nextPages).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(nextPages[0]?.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["comment-3"]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(nextPages[1]?.map((comment) => comment.id)).toEqual(["comment-1"]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
it("applies optimistic reopen and reassignment updates to the issue cache", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const next = applyOptimisticIssueCommentUpdate(
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Fix comment flow",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
checkoutRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionLockedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueNumber: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1",
|
|
|
|
|
originKind: "manual",
|
|
|
|
|
originId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
originRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
requestDepth: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
billingCode: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspacePreference: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
|
|
|
|
|
startedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
completedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
cancelledAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
reopen: true,
|
|
|
|
|
reassignment: {
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: "board-2",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.status).toBe("todo");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.assigneeAgentId).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.assigneeUserId).toBe("board-2");
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-03-28 11:25:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
it("applies optimistic field updates for issue property edits", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const next = applyOptimisticIssueFieldUpdate(
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: "project-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: "workspace-1",
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
parentId: null,
|
2026-04-10 22:26:21 -05:00
|
|
|
ancestors: [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-9",
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-9",
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Old parent",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
project: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goal: null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
title: "Fix property pane",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
checkoutRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionLockedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueNumber: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1",
|
|
|
|
|
originKind: "manual",
|
|
|
|
|
originId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
originRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
requestDepth: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
billingCode: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: "exec-1",
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspacePreference: "shared_workspace",
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
|
|
|
|
|
startedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
completedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
cancelledAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
labelIds: ["label-1", "label-2"],
|
|
|
|
|
labels: [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "label-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
name: "One",
|
|
|
|
|
color: "#111111",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "label-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
name: "Two",
|
|
|
|
|
color: "#222222",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
blockedBy: [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-2",
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2",
|
|
|
|
|
title: "First blocker",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-3",
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-3",
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Second blocker",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
blocks: [],
|
|
|
|
|
project: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "project-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
urlKey: "project-one",
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalIds: [],
|
|
|
|
|
goals: [],
|
|
|
|
|
name: "Project one",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
|
|
|
leadAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
targetDate: null,
|
|
|
|
|
color: null,
|
|
|
|
|
env: null,
|
|
|
|
|
pauseReason: null,
|
|
|
|
|
pausedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspacePolicy: null,
|
|
|
|
|
codebase: {
|
|
|
|
|
workspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
repoUrl: null,
|
|
|
|
|
repoRef: null,
|
|
|
|
|
defaultRef: null,
|
|
|
|
|
repoName: null,
|
|
|
|
|
localFolder: null,
|
|
|
|
|
managedFolder: "/tmp/paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
effectiveLocalFolder: "/tmp/paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
origin: "local_folder",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
workspaces: [],
|
|
|
|
|
primaryWorkspace: null,
|
|
|
|
|
archivedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
currentExecutionWorkspace: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "exec-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: "project-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceIssueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
mode: "shared_workspace",
|
|
|
|
|
strategyType: "project_primary",
|
|
|
|
|
branchName: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
|
|
|
name: "Execution workspace",
|
|
|
|
|
cwd: "/tmp/paperclip",
|
|
|
|
|
repoUrl: null,
|
|
|
|
|
baseRef: null,
|
|
|
|
|
providerType: "local_fs",
|
|
|
|
|
providerRef: null,
|
|
|
|
|
derivedFromExecutionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
lastUsedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupEligibleAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
cleanupReason: null,
|
|
|
|
|
config: null,
|
|
|
|
|
metadata: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
openedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
closedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: "board-2",
|
|
|
|
|
labelIds: ["label-2"],
|
|
|
|
|
blockedByIssueIds: ["issue-3"],
|
2026-04-10 22:26:21 -05:00
|
|
|
parentId: "issue-4",
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
projectId: "project-2",
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: "exec-2",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.status).toBe("in_review");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.assigneeAgentId).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.assigneeUserId).toBe("board-2");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.labelIds).toEqual(["label-2"]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.labels?.map((label) => label.id)).toEqual(["label-2"]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.blockedBy?.map((relation) => relation.id)).toEqual(["issue-3"]);
|
2026-04-10 22:26:21 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(next?.parentId).toBe("issue-4");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.ancestors).toBeUndefined();
|
2026-04-07 18:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(next?.projectId).toBe("project-2");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.project).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.executionWorkspaceId).toBe("exec-2");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.currentExecutionWorkspace).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("matches issues by either uuid or identifier reference", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(matchesIssueRef({ id: "issue-1", identifier: "PAP-1" } as const, ["issue-1"])).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(matchesIssueRef({ id: "issue-1", identifier: "PAP-1" } as const, ["PAP-1"])).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(matchesIssueRef({ id: "issue-1", identifier: "PAP-1" } as const, ["issue-2", "PAP-2"])).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("applies optimistic field updates across cached issue collections", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const issues: Issue[] = [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Fix property pane",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
checkoutRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionLockedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueNumber: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1",
|
|
|
|
|
originKind: "manual",
|
|
|
|
|
originId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
originRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
requestDepth: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
billingCode: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspacePreference: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
|
|
|
|
|
startedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
completedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
cancelledAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
|
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
|
|
|
blockedBy: [],
|
|
|
|
|
blocks: [],
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "issue-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Leave me alone",
|
|
|
|
|
description: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-2",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
checkoutRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionLockedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueNumber: 2,
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2",
|
|
|
|
|
originKind: "manual",
|
|
|
|
|
originId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
originRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
requestDepth: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
billingCode: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspacePreference: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
|
|
|
|
|
startedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
completedAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
cancelledAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
|
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
|
|
|
blockedBy: [],
|
|
|
|
|
blocks: [],
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T14:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const next = applyOptimisticIssueFieldUpdateToCollection(issues, ["PAP-1"], { assigneeAgentId: "agent-9" });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.[0]?.assigneeAgentId).toBe("agent-9");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(next?.[1]?.assigneeAgentId).toBe("agent-2");
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-28 11:25:25 -05:00
|
|
|
it("treats comments without a run id as queued when they arrive during an active run", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
isQueuedIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
comment: {
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
activeRunStartedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
runId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not mark comments with an associated run as queued", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
isQueuedIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
comment: {
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
activeRunStartedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not mark interrupt comments as queued", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
isQueuedIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
comment: {
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
activeRunStartedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
interruptedRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-04-06 08:27:53 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not mark comments from the active run agent as queued", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
isQueuedIssueComment({
|
|
|
|
|
comment: {
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
activeRunStartedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:00.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
activeRunAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
|
|
|
runId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
[codex] Polish issue board workflows (#4224)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Human operators supervise that work through issue lists, issue
detail, comments, inbox groups, markdown references, and
profile/activity surfaces
> - The branch had many small UI fixes that improve the operator loop
but do not need to ship with backend runtime migrations
> - These changes belong together as board workflow polish because they
affect scanning, navigation, issue context, comment state, and markdown
clarity
> - This pull request groups the UI-only slice so it can merge
independently from runtime/backend changes
> - The benefit is a clearer board experience with better issue context,
steadier optimistic updates, and more predictable keyboard navigation
## What Changed
- Improves issue properties, sub-issue actions, blocker chips, and issue
list/detail refresh behavior.
- Adds blocker context above the issue composer and stabilizes
queued/interrupted comment UI state.
- Improves markdown issue/GitHub link rendering and opens external
markdown links in a new tab.
- Adds inbox group keyboard navigation and fold/unfold support.
- Polishes activity/avatar/profile/settings/workspace presentation
details.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/lib/optimistic-issue-comments.test.ts`
## Risks
- Low to medium risk: changes are UI-focused but cover high-traffic
issue and inbox surfaces.
- This branch intentionally does not include the backend runtime changes
from the companion PR; where UI calls newer API filters, unsupported
servers should continue to fail visibly through existing API error
handling.
- Visual screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; targeted
component/helper tests cover the changed behavior.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, shell/git tool use
enabled. Exact hosted model build and context window are not exposed in
this Paperclip heartbeat environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-04-21 12:25:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a confirmed queued comment queued while the target run is still live", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Follow up after the active run",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const result = applyLocalQueuedIssueCommentState(comment, {
|
|
|
|
|
queuedTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
2026-04-21 16:50:26 -05:00
|
|
|
targetRunIsLive: true,
|
[codex] Polish issue board workflows (#4224)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Human operators supervise that work through issue lists, issue
detail, comments, inbox groups, markdown references, and
profile/activity surfaces
> - The branch had many small UI fixes that improve the operator loop
but do not need to ship with backend runtime migrations
> - These changes belong together as board workflow polish because they
affect scanning, navigation, issue context, comment state, and markdown
clarity
> - This pull request groups the UI-only slice so it can merge
independently from runtime/backend changes
> - The benefit is a clearer board experience with better issue context,
steadier optimistic updates, and more predictable keyboard navigation
## What Changed
- Improves issue properties, sub-issue actions, blocker chips, and issue
list/detail refresh behavior.
- Adds blocker context above the issue composer and stabilizes
queued/interrupted comment UI state.
- Improves markdown issue/GitHub link rendering and opens external
markdown links in a new tab.
- Adds inbox group keyboard navigation and fold/unfold support.
- Polishes activity/avatar/profile/settings/workspace presentation
details.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/lib/optimistic-issue-comments.test.ts`
## Risks
- Low to medium risk: changes are UI-focused but cover high-traffic
issue and inbox surfaces.
- This branch intentionally does not include the backend runtime changes
from the companion PR; where UI calls newer API filters, unsupported
servers should continue to fail visibly through existing API error
handling.
- Visual screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; targeted
component/helper tests cover the changed behavior.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, shell/git tool use
enabled. Exact hosted model build and context window are not exposed in
this Paperclip heartbeat environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-04-21 12:25:34 -05:00
|
|
|
runningRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
clientStatus: "queued",
|
|
|
|
|
queueState: "queued",
|
|
|
|
|
queueTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not keep local queued state after the target run is no longer live", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Follow up after the active run",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const result = applyLocalQueuedIssueCommentState(comment, {
|
|
|
|
|
queuedTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
2026-04-21 16:50:26 -05:00
|
|
|
targetRunIsLive: false,
|
[codex] Polish issue board workflows (#4224)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Human operators supervise that work through issue lists, issue
detail, comments, inbox groups, markdown references, and
profile/activity surfaces
> - The branch had many small UI fixes that improve the operator loop
but do not need to ship with backend runtime migrations
> - These changes belong together as board workflow polish because they
affect scanning, navigation, issue context, comment state, and markdown
clarity
> - This pull request groups the UI-only slice so it can merge
independently from runtime/backend changes
> - The benefit is a clearer board experience with better issue context,
steadier optimistic updates, and more predictable keyboard navigation
## What Changed
- Improves issue properties, sub-issue actions, blocker chips, and issue
list/detail refresh behavior.
- Adds blocker context above the issue composer and stabilizes
queued/interrupted comment UI state.
- Improves markdown issue/GitHub link rendering and opens external
markdown links in a new tab.
- Adds inbox group keyboard navigation and fold/unfold support.
- Polishes activity/avatar/profile/settings/workspace presentation
details.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/lib/optimistic-issue-comments.test.ts`
## Risks
- Low to medium risk: changes are UI-focused but cover high-traffic
issue and inbox surfaces.
- This branch intentionally does not include the backend runtime changes
from the companion PR; where UI calls newer API filters, unsupported
servers should continue to fail visibly through existing API error
handling.
- Visual screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; targeted
component/helper tests cover the changed behavior.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, shell/git tool use
enabled. Exact hosted model build and context window are not exposed in
this Paperclip heartbeat environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-04-21 12:25:34 -05:00
|
|
|
runningRunId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toBe(comment);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-04-21 16:50:26 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not keep local queued state when a different run is live", () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const comment = {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
|
|
|
authorAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
authorUserId: "board-1",
|
|
|
|
|
body: "Follow up after the active run",
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-28T16:20:05.000Z"),
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const result = applyLocalQueuedIssueCommentState(comment, {
|
|
|
|
|
queuedTargetRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
targetRunIsLive: true,
|
|
|
|
|
runningRunId: "run-2",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toBe(comment);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-03-28 09:46:34 -05:00
|
|
|
});
|