paperclip/ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx

551 lines
16 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { act } from "react";
import type { ComponentProps, ReactNode } from "react";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { NewIssueDialog } from "./NewIssueDialog";
const dialogState = vi.hoisted(() => ({
newIssueOpen: true,
newIssueDefaults: {} as Record<string, unknown>,
closeNewIssue: vi.fn(),
}));
const companyState = vi.hoisted(() => ({
companies: [
{
id: "company-1",
name: "Paperclip",
status: "active",
brandColor: "#123456",
issuePrefix: "PAP",
},
],
selectedCompanyId: "company-1",
selectedCompany: {
id: "company-1",
name: "Paperclip",
status: "active",
brandColor: "#123456",
issuePrefix: "PAP",
},
}));
const toastState = vi.hoisted(() => ({
pushToast: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssuesApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
create: vi.fn(),
upsertDocument: vi.fn(),
uploadAttachment: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockExecutionWorkspacesApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockProjectsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
adapterModels: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAuthApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getSession: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAssetsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
uploadImage: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../context/DialogContext", () => ({
useDialog: () => dialogState,
}));
vi.mock("../context/CompanyContext", () => ({
useCompany: () => companyState,
}));
vi.mock("../context/ToastContext", () => ({
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 13:34:52 -05:00
useToastActions: () => toastState,
2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
}));
vi.mock("../api/issues", () => ({
issuesApi: mockIssuesApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/execution-workspaces", () => ({
executionWorkspacesApi: mockExecutionWorkspacesApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/projects", () => ({
projectsApi: mockProjectsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/agents", () => ({
agentsApi: mockAgentsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/auth", () => ({
authApi: mockAuthApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/assets", () => ({
assetsApi: mockAssetsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/instanceSettings", () => ({
instanceSettingsApi: mockInstanceSettingsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../hooks/useProjectOrder", () => ({
useProjectOrder: ({ projects }: { projects: unknown[] }) => ({
orderedProjects: projects,
}),
}));
vi.mock("../lib/recent-assignees", () => ({
getRecentAssigneeIds: () => [],
sortAgentsByRecency: (agents: unknown[]) => agents,
trackRecentAssignee: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../lib/assignees", () => ({
assigneeValueFromSelection: ({
assigneeAgentId,
assigneeUserId,
}: {
assigneeAgentId?: string;
assigneeUserId?: string;
}) => assigneeAgentId ? `agent:${assigneeAgentId}` : assigneeUserId ? `user:${assigneeUserId}` : "",
currentUserAssigneeOption: () => [],
parseAssigneeValue: (value: string) => ({
assigneeAgentId: value.startsWith("agent:") ? value.slice("agent:".length) : null,
assigneeUserId: value.startsWith("user:") ? value.slice("user:".length) : null,
}),
}));
vi.mock("./MarkdownEditor", async () => {
const React = await import("react");
return {
MarkdownEditor: React.forwardRef<
{ focus: () => void },
{ value: string; onChange?: (value: string) => void; placeholder?: string }
>(function MarkdownEditorMock({ value, onChange, placeholder }, ref) {
React.useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
focus: () => undefined,
}));
return (
<textarea
aria-label={placeholder ?? "Description"}
value={value}
onChange={(event) => onChange?.(event.target.value)}
/>
);
}),
};
});
vi.mock("./InlineEntitySelector", async () => {
const React = await import("react");
return {
InlineEntitySelector: React.forwardRef<
HTMLButtonElement,
{
value: string;
placeholder?: string;
renderTriggerValue?: (option: { id: string; label: string } | null) => ReactNode;
}
>(function InlineEntitySelectorMock({ value, placeholder, renderTriggerValue }, ref) {
return (
<button ref={ref} type="button">
{(renderTriggerValue?.(value ? { id: value, label: value } : null) ?? value) || placeholder}
</button>
);
}),
};
});
vi.mock("./AgentIconPicker", () => ({
AgentIcon: () => null,
}));
vi.mock("@/components/ui/dialog", () => ({
Dialog: ({ open, children }: { open: boolean; children: ReactNode }) => (open ? <div>{children}</div> : null),
DialogContent: ({
children,
showCloseButton: _showCloseButton,
onEscapeKeyDown: _onEscapeKeyDown,
onPointerDownOutside: _onPointerDownOutside,
...props
}: ComponentProps<"div"> & {
showCloseButton?: boolean;
onEscapeKeyDown?: (event: unknown) => void;
onPointerDownOutside?: (event: unknown) => void;
}) => <div {...props}>{children}</div>,
}));
vi.mock("@/components/ui/button", () => ({
Button: ({ children, onClick, type = "button", ...props }: ComponentProps<"button">) => (
<button type={type} onClick={onClick} {...props}>{children}</button>
),
}));
vi.mock("@/components/ui/toggle-switch", () => ({
ToggleSwitch: ({ checked, onCheckedChange }: { checked: boolean; onCheckedChange: () => void }) => (
<button type="button" aria-pressed={checked} onClick={onCheckedChange}>toggle</button>
),
}));
vi.mock("@/components/ui/popover", () => ({
Popover: ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => <div>{children}</div>,
PopoverTrigger: ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => <>{children}</>,
PopoverContent: ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => <div>{children}</div>,
}));
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
async function flush() {
await act(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
});
}
function renderDialog(container: HTMLDivElement) {
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: {
queries: { retry: false },
mutations: { retry: false },
},
});
const root = createRoot(container);
act(() => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<NewIssueDialog />
</QueryClientProvider>,
);
});
return { root, queryClient };
}
describe("NewIssueDialog", () => {
let container: HTMLDivElement;
beforeEach(() => {
container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
dialogState.newIssueOpen = true;
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {};
dialogState.closeNewIssue.mockReset();
toastState.pushToast.mockReset();
mockIssuesApi.create.mockReset();
mockIssuesApi.upsertDocument.mockReset();
mockIssuesApi.uploadAttachment.mockReset();
mockExecutionWorkspacesApi.list.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockProjectsApi.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "project-1",
name: "Alpha",
description: null,
archivedAt: null,
color: "#445566",
},
]);
mockAgentsApi.list.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockAgentsApi.adapterModels.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockAuthApi.getSession.mockResolvedValue({ user: { id: "user-1" } });
mockAssetsApi.uploadImage.mockResolvedValue({ contentPath: "/uploads/asset.png" });
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false });
mockIssuesApi.create.mockResolvedValue({
id: "issue-2",
companyId: "company-1",
identifier: "PAP-2",
});
});
afterEach(() => {
document.body.innerHTML = "";
});
it("shows sub-issue context only when opened from a sub-issue action", async () => {
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {
parentId: "issue-1",
parentIdentifier: "PAP-1",
parentTitle: "Parent issue",
projectId: "project-1",
goalId: "goal-1",
};
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
expect(container.textContent).toContain("New sub-issue");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Sub-issue of");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("PAP-1");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Parent issue");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Create Sub-Issue");
act(() => root.unmount());
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {};
const rerendered = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
expect(container.textContent).toContain("New issue");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Create Issue");
expect(container.textContent).not.toContain("Sub-issue of");
act(() => rerendered.root.unmount());
});
it("submits parent and goal context for sub-issues", async () => {
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
mockProjectsApi.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "project-1",
name: "Alpha",
description: null,
archivedAt: null,
color: "#445566",
executionWorkspacePolicy: {
enabled: true,
defaultMode: "shared_workspace",
},
},
]);
mockExecutionWorkspacesApi.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "workspace-1",
name: "Parent workspace",
status: "active",
branchName: "feature/pap-1",
cwd: "/tmp/workspace-1",
lastUsedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T16:00:00.000Z"),
},
]);
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {
parentId: "issue-1",
parentIdentifier: "PAP-1",
parentTitle: "Parent issue",
title: "Child issue",
projectId: "project-1",
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
executionWorkspaceId: "workspace-1",
2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
goalId: "goal-1",
};
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
const submitButton = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("button"))
.find((button) => button.textContent?.includes("Create Sub-Issue"));
expect(submitButton).not.toBeUndefined();
expect(submitButton?.hasAttribute("disabled")).toBe(false);
await act(async () => {
submitButton!.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true }));
});
await flush();
expect(mockIssuesApi.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Child issue",
parentId: "issue-1",
goalId: "goal-1",
projectId: "project-1",
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
executionWorkspaceId: "workspace-1",
2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
}),
);
act(() => root.unmount());
});
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
[codex] Split PR #4692 UI/QoL updates (#4701) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents through a company-scoped control plane. > - The affected surface is the board UI for issue threads, issue lists, routines, dialogs, navigation, and issue review indicators. > - Closed PR #4692 bundled backend, schema, docs, workflow, and UI/QoL work into one oversized change set. > - Greptile could not keep reviewing that broad PR because it exceeded the 100-file review limit and mixed unrelated concerns. > - This pull request extracts the UI/QoL slice into a fresh branch under the review limit while leaving workflow and lockfile churn out. > - The benefit is a focused review path for the board UI performance and workflow improvements without reopening the oversized PR. ## What Changed - Added long issue-thread virtualization, scroll-container binding, anchor preservation, latest-comment jump targeting, and related regression/perf fixtures. - Improved issue list scalability with scroll-based loading, server offset parameters, and pagination-focused UI tests. - Reduced new issue dialog typing churn and split dialog action subscriptions so broad layout/nav surfaces avoid unnecessary renders. - Added routine variables help and routine description mention options for users, agents, and projects. - Added productivity review badge/link UI and fixed the badge to use Paperclip's company-prefixed router link. - Kept the split PR below Greptile's review limit and excluded `.github/workflows/pr.yml` and `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Verification - `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` in the clean worktree to install `@tanstack/react-virtual` locally without committing lockfile churn. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx src/pages/Routines.test.tsx src/pages/Issues.test.tsx` passed: 5 files, 83 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` passed. - Split-scope checks: 53 changed files; no `.github/workflows/pr.yml`; no `pnpm-lock.yaml`. - Screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; the changes are primarily virtualization, routing, pagination, and editor behavior covered by focused regression tests. ## Risks - Moderate UI risk because issue-thread virtualization changes scroll behavior on long conversations; regression tests cover anchor jumps, latest-comment targeting, row metadata, and short-thread fallback. - Moderate integration risk because the issue-list offset parameter and productivity review field depend on matching API behavior. - Dependency risk: the UI package adds `@tanstack/react-virtual` while repository policy keeps `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of PRs, so CI must resolve dependency changes through the repo's normal lockfile policy. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and GitHub workflow. Exact runtime context window was not exposed by the harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-28 17:18:58 -05:00
it("submits the latest locally typed title and description", async () => {
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
const titleInput = container.querySelector('textarea[placeholder="Issue title"]') as HTMLTextAreaElement | null;
const descriptionInput = container.querySelector('textarea[aria-label="Add description..."]') as HTMLTextAreaElement | null;
expect(titleInput).not.toBeNull();
expect(descriptionInput).not.toBeNull();
await act(async () => {
const valueSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
HTMLTextAreaElement.prototype,
"value",
)?.set;
valueSetter?.call(titleInput, "Typed issue");
titleInput!.dispatchEvent(new Event("input", { bubbles: true }));
});
await flush();
await act(async () => {
const valueSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
HTMLTextAreaElement.prototype,
"value",
)?.set;
valueSetter?.call(descriptionInput, "Typed description");
descriptionInput!.dispatchEvent(new Event("input", { bubbles: true }));
});
await flush();
const submitButton = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("button"))
.find((button) => button.textContent?.includes("Create Issue"));
expect(submitButton).not.toBeUndefined();
expect(submitButton?.hasAttribute("disabled")).toBe(false);
await act(async () => {
submitButton!.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true }));
});
await flush();
expect(mockIssuesApi.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Typed issue",
description: "Typed description",
}),
);
act(() => root.unmount());
});
[codex] Improve issue detail and issue-list UX (#3678) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - A core part of that is the operator experience around reading issue state, agent chat, and sub-task structure > - The current branch had a long run of issue-detail and issue-list UX fixes that all improve how humans follow and steer active work > - Those changes mostly live in the UI/chat surface and should be reviewed together instead of mixed with workspace/runtime work > - This pull request packages the issue-detail, chat, markdown, and sub-issue list improvements into one standalone change > - The benefit is a cleaner, less jumpy, more reliable issue workflow on desktop and mobile without coupling it to unrelated server/runtime refactors ## What Changed - Stabilized issue chat runtime wiring, optimistic comment handling, queued-comment cancellation, and composer anchoring during live updates - Fixed several issue-detail rendering and navigation regressions including placeholder bleed, local polling scope, mobile inbox-to-issue transitions, and visible refresh resets - Improved markdown and rich-content handling with advisory image normalization, editor fallback behavior, touch mention recovery, and `issue:` quicklook links - Refined sub-issue behavior with parent-derived defaults, current-user inheritance fixes, empty-state cleanup, and a reusable issue-list presentation for sub-issues - Added targeted UI tests for the new issue-detail, chat scroll/message, placeholder-data, markdown, and issue-list behaviors ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-scroll.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts ui/src/lib/query-placeholder-data.test.tsx ui/src/hooks/usePaperclipIssueRuntime.test.tsx` ## Risks - Medium: this branch touches the highest-traffic issue-detail UI paths, so regressions would show up as chat/thread or sub-issue UX glitches - The changes are UI-heavy and would benefit from reviewer screenshots or a quick manual browser pass before merge ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 12:50:48 -05:00
it("submits the parent assignee when a sub-issue opens with inherited defaults", async () => {
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {
parentId: "issue-1",
parentIdentifier: "PAP-1",
parentTitle: "Parent issue",
title: "Child issue",
projectId: "project-1",
goalId: "goal-1",
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
};
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
const submitButton = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("button"))
.find((button) => button.textContent?.includes("Create Sub-Issue"));
expect(submitButton).not.toBeUndefined();
await act(async () => {
submitButton!.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true }));
});
await flush();
expect(mockIssuesApi.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Child issue",
parentId: "issue-1",
goalId: "goal-1",
projectId: "project-1",
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
}),
);
act(() => root.unmount());
});
it("keeps the mobile dialog bounded with an internal flexible scroll region", async () => {
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
const dialogContent = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("div")).find((element) =>
typeof element.className === "string" && element.className.includes("max-h-[calc(100dvh-2rem)]"),
);
expect(dialogContent?.className).toContain("h-[calc(100dvh-2rem)]");
expect(dialogContent?.className).toContain("overflow-hidden");
const titleInput = container.querySelector('textarea[placeholder="Issue title"]');
const descriptionInput = container.querySelector('textarea[aria-label="Add description..."]');
const bodyScrollRegion = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("div")).find((element) =>
typeof element.className === "string" && element.className.includes("overscroll-contain"),
);
expect(bodyScrollRegion?.className).toContain("flex-1");
expect(bodyScrollRegion?.className).toContain("overflow-y-auto");
expect(bodyScrollRegion?.contains(titleInput ?? null)).toBe(true);
expect(bodyScrollRegion?.contains(descriptionInput ?? null)).toBe(true);
act(() => root.unmount());
});
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
it("warns when a sub-issue stops matching the parent workspace", async () => {
mockProjectsApi.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "project-1",
name: "Alpha",
description: null,
archivedAt: null,
color: "#445566",
executionWorkspacePolicy: {
enabled: true,
defaultMode: "shared_workspace",
},
},
]);
mockExecutionWorkspacesApi.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "workspace-1",
name: "Parent workspace",
status: "active",
branchName: "feature/pap-1",
cwd: "/tmp/workspace-1",
lastUsedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T16:00:00.000Z"),
},
{
id: "workspace-2",
name: "Other workspace",
status: "active",
branchName: "feature/pap-2",
cwd: "/tmp/workspace-2",
lastUsedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T16:01:00.000Z"),
},
]);
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
dialogState.newIssueDefaults = {
parentId: "issue-1",
parentIdentifier: "PAP-1",
parentTitle: "Parent issue",
title: "Child issue",
projectId: "project-1",
executionWorkspaceId: "workspace-1",
parentExecutionWorkspaceLabel: "Parent workspace",
goalId: "goal-1",
};
const { root } = renderDialog(container);
await flush();
await flush();
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
expect(container.textContent).not.toContain("will no longer use the parent issue workspace");
const selects = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("select"));
const modeSelect = selects[0] as HTMLSelectElement | undefined;
expect(modeSelect).not.toBeUndefined();
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
await act(async () => {
modeSelect!.value = "shared_workspace";
modeSelect!.dispatchEvent(new Event("change", { bubbles: true }));
2026-04-06 11:34:11 -05:00
});
await flush();
expect(container.textContent).toContain("will no longer use the parent issue workspace");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Parent workspace");
act(() => root.unmount());
});
2026-04-06 10:58:59 -05:00
});