paperclip/cli/README.md

305 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

<p align="center">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/header.png" alt="Paperclip — runs your business" width="720" />
</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="#quickstart"><strong>Quickstart</strong></a> &middot;
<a href="https://paperclip.ing/docs"><strong>Docs</strong></a> &middot;
<a href="https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip"><strong>GitHub</strong></a> &middot;
<a href="https://discord.gg/m4HZY7xNG3"><strong>Discord</strong></a>
</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/master/LICENSE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue" alt="MIT License" /></a>
<a href="https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/stargazers"><img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/paperclipai/paperclip?style=flat" alt="Stars" /></a>
<a href="https://discord.gg/m4HZY7xNG3"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/discord-join%20chat-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white" alt="Discord" /></a>
</p>
<br/>
<div align="center">
<video src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/773bdfb2-6d1e-4e30-8c5f-3487d5b70c8f" width="600" controls></video>
</div>
<br/>
## What is Paperclip?
# Open-source orchestration for zero-human companies
**If OpenClaw is an _employee_, Paperclip is the _company_**
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track your agents' work and costs from one dashboard.
It looks like a task manager — but under the hood it has org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.
**Manage business goals, not pull requests.**
| | Step | Example |
| ------ | --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **01** | Define the goal | _"Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR."_ |
| **02** | Hire the team | CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider. |
| **03** | Approve and run | Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard. |
<br/>
> **COMING SOON: Clipmart** — Download and run entire companies with one click. Browse pre-built company templates — full org structures, agent configs, and skills — and import them into your Paperclip instance in seconds.
<br/>
<div align="center">
<table>
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong>Works<br/>with</strong></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/openclaw.svg" width="32" alt="OpenClaw" /><br/><sub>OpenClaw</sub></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/claude.svg" width="32" alt="Claude" /><br/><sub>Claude Code</sub></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/codex.svg" width="32" alt="Codex" /><br/><sub>Codex</sub></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/cursor.svg" width="32" alt="Cursor" /><br/><sub>Cursor</sub></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/bash.svg" width="32" alt="Bash" /><br/><sub>Bash</sub></td>
<td align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/logos/http.svg" width="32" alt="HTTP" /><br/><sub>HTTP</sub></td>
</tr>
</table>
<em>If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.</em>
</div>
<br/>
## Paperclip is right for you if
- ✅ You want to build **autonomous AI companies**
- ✅ You **coordinate many different agents** (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
- ✅ You have **20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals** open and lose track of what everyone is doing
- ✅ You want agents running **autonomously 24/7**, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
- ✅ You want to **monitor costs** and enforce budgets
- ✅ You want a process for managing agents that **feels like using a task manager**
- ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses **from your phone**
<br/>
## Features
<table>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="33%">
<h3>🔌 Bring Your Own Agent</h3>
Any agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.
</td>
<td align="center" width="33%">
<h3>🎯 Goal Alignment</h3>
Every task traces back to the company mission. Agents know <em>what</em> to do and <em>why</em>.
</td>
<td align="center" width="33%">
<h3>💓 Heartbeats</h3>
Agents wake on a schedule, check work, and act. Delegation flows up and down the org chart.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<h3>💰 Cost Control</h3>
Monthly budgets per agent. When they hit the limit, they stop. No runaway costs.
</td>
<td align="center">
<h3>🏢 Multi-Company</h3>
One deployment, many companies. Complete data isolation. One control plane for your portfolio.
</td>
<td align="center">
<h3>🎫 Ticket System</h3>
Every conversation traced. Every decision explained. Full tool-call tracing and immutable audit log.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<h3>🛡️ Governance</h3>
You're the board. Approve hires, override strategy, pause or terminate any agent — at any time.
</td>
<td align="center">
<h3>📊 Org Chart</h3>
Hierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description.
</td>
<td align="center">
<h3>📱 Mobile Ready</h3>
Monitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere.
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br/>
## Problems Paperclip solves
| Without Paperclip | With Paperclip |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| ❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. | ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots. |
| ❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. | ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why. |
| ❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. | ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts. |
| ❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. | ✅ Cost tracking surfaces token budgets and throttles agents when they're out. Management prioritizes with budgets. |
| ❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. | ✅ Heartbeats handle regular work on a schedule. Management supervises. |
| ❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. | ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work. |
<br/>
## Why Paperclip is special
Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.
| | |
| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Atomic execution.** | Task checkout and budget enforcement are atomic, so no double-work and no runaway spend. |
| **Persistent agent state.** | Agents resume the same task context across heartbeats instead of restarting from scratch. |
| **Runtime skill injection.** | Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining. |
| **Governance with rollback.** | Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely. |
| **Goal-aware execution.** | Tasks carry full goal ancestry so agents consistently see the "why," not just a title. |
| **Portable company templates.** | Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling. |
| **True multi-company isolation.** | Every entity is company-scoped, so one deployment can run many companies with separate data and audit trails. |
<br/>
## What Paperclip is not
| | |
| ---------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Not a chatbot.** | Agents have jobs, not chat windows. |
| **Not an agent framework.** | We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them. |
| **Not a workflow builder.** | No drag-and-drop pipelines. Paperclip models companies — with org charts, goals, budgets, and governance. |
| **Not a prompt manager.** | Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in. |
| **Not a single-agent tool.** | This is for teams. If you have one agent, you probably don't need Paperclip. If you have twenty — you definitely do. |
| **Not a code review tool.** | Paperclip orchestrates work, not pull requests. Bring your own review process. |
<br/>
## Quickstart
Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required.
```bash
npx paperclipai onboard --yes
```
That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:
```bash
npx paperclipai onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai onboard --yes --bind tailnet
```
If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning `onboard` keeps the existing config in place. Use `paperclipai configure` to edit settings.
Or manually:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev
```
This starts the API server at `http://localhost:3100`. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.
> **Requirements:** Node.js 20+, pnpm 9.15+
<br/>
## FAQ
**What does a typical setup look like?**
Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.
If you're a solo-entreprenuer you can use Tailscale to access Paperclip on the go. Then later you can deploy to e.g. Vercel when you need it.
**Can I run multiple companies?**
Yes. A single deployment can run an unlimited number of companies with complete data isolation.
**How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code?**
Paperclip _uses_ those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.
**Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello?**
Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.
(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)
**Do agents run continuously?**
By default, agents run on scheduled heartbeats and event-based triggers (task assignment, @-mentions). You can also hook in continuous agents like OpenClaw. You bring your agent and Paperclip coordinates.
<br/>
## Development
```bash
pnpm dev # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server # Server only
pnpm build # Build all
pnpm typecheck # Type checking
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 13:34:52 -05:00
pnpm test # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate # Apply migrations
```
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 13:34:52 -05:00
`pnpm test` does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.
See [doc/DEVELOPING.md](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/master/doc/DEVELOPING.md) for the full development guide.
<br/>
## Roadmap
- ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
- ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
- ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
- ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
- ✅ Skills Manager
- ✅ Scheduled Routines
- ✅ Better Budgeting
- ⚪ Artifacts & Deployments
- ⚪ CEO Chat
- ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
- ⚪ Multiple Human Users
- ⚪ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e.g. Cursor / e2b agents)
- ⚪ Cloud deployments
- ⚪ Desktop App
<br/>
## Community & Plugins
Find Plugins and more at [awesome-paperclip](https://github.com/gsxdsm/awesome-paperclip)
## Contributing
We welcome contributions. See the [contributing guide](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) for details.
<br/>
## Community
- [Discord](https://discord.gg/m4HZY7xNG3) — Join the community
- [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/issues) — bugs and feature requests
- [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/discussions) — ideas and RFC
<br/>
## License
MIT &copy; 2026 Paperclip
## Star History
[![Star History Chart](https://api.star-history.com/image?repos=paperclipai/paperclip&type=date&legend=top-left)](https://www.star-history.com/?repos=paperclipai%2Fpaperclip&type=date&legend=top-left)
<br/>
---
<p align="center">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/doc/assets/footer.jpg" alt="" width="720" />
</p>
<p align="center">
<sub>Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to run companies, not babysit agents.</sub>
</p>