[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.
## What Changed
- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.
## Verification
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check
## Risks
- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00
|
|
|
import express from "express";
|
|
|
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
|
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
|
|
|
const CREATED_AGENT_ID = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
|
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const mockInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
|
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
acceptInteraction: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
acceptSuggestedTasks: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
rejectInteraction: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
rejectSuggestedTasks: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
answerQuestions: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
|
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
accessService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
|
|
|
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => true),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
agentService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
|
|
|
resolveByReference: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, raw: string) => ({
|
|
|
|
|
ambiguous: false,
|
|
|
|
|
agent: { id: raw },
|
|
|
|
|
})),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
clampIssueListLimit: (value: number) => value,
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUE_LIST_DEFAULT_LIMIT: 500,
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUE_LIST_MAX_LIMIT: 1000,
|
|
|
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
|
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
|
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
|
|
|
general: {
|
|
|
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
|
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
})),
|
|
|
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
|
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
|
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
|
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
|
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
|
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
|
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
|
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
|
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockInteractionService,
|
|
|
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
|
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
routineService: () => ({
|
|
|
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function createIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
|
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
|
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdByUserId: "local-board",
|
|
|
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1714",
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Persist interactions",
|
|
|
|
|
executionPolicy: null,
|
|
|
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
|
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
|
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown> = {
|
|
|
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
|
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
|
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
|
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
|
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
|
|
|
}) {
|
|
|
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
|
|
|
import("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
|
|
|
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
|
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
|
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
|
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
|
|
|
next();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
|
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
|
|
|
return app;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
[codex] Stabilize tests and local maintenance assets (#4423)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable
local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work
> - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model
selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed
Playwright's headless shell binary
> - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated
review artifact from the working branch
> - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so
they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes
> - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner
local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs
## What Changed
- Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test
isolation.
- Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized
Claude/company-import related assertions.
- Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models.
- Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect
`chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing.
- Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts
src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts`
from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config
vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file,
3 tests.
- `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh &&
scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected
`chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them.
- `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f
ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance --
. ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config
cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree
because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the
worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests
are scheduled.
- Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified
third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those
generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that
artifact before merge.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior;
the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation
from the source branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 15:11:42 -05:00
|
|
|
describe.sequential("issue thread interaction routes", () => {
|
[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.
## What Changed
- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.
## Verification
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check
## Risks
- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
|
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
|
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
|
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
|
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
|
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
|
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
[codex] Stabilize tests and local maintenance assets (#4423)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable
local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work
> - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model
selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed
Playwright's headless shell binary
> - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated
review artifact from the working branch
> - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so
they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes
> - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner
local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs
## What Changed
- Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test
isolation.
- Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized
Claude/company-import related assertions.
- Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models.
- Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect
`chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing.
- Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts
src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts`
from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config
vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file,
3 tests.
- `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh &&
scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected
`chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them.
- `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f
ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance --
. ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config
cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree
because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the
worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
## Risks
- Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests
are scheduled.
- Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified
third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those
generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that
artifact before merge.
- No database migrations.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior;
the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation
from the source branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 15:11:42 -05:00
|
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.
## What Changed
- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.
## Verification
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check
## Risks
- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00
|
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(createIssue());
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.listForIssue.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: null,
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
|
|
|
interaction: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
createdTasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", issueId: "child-1" }],
|
|
|
|
|
skippedClientKeys: ["task-2"],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdIssues: [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.rejectInteraction.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
rejectionReason: "Not actionable enough",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.answerQuestions.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-2",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "answered",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-2",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
|
|
|
id: "scope",
|
|
|
|
|
prompt: "Scope?",
|
|
|
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
|
|
|
options: [{ id: "phase-1", label: "Phase 1" }],
|
|
|
|
|
}],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
answers: [{ questionId: "scope", optionIds: ["phase-1"] }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:06:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:06:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("lists and creates board-authored interactions", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.listForIssue.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: "interaction-1", kind: "suggest_tasks", status: "pending" },
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const listRes = await request(app).get("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions");
|
|
|
|
|
expect(listRes.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(listRes.body).toEqual([
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: "interaction-1", kind: "suggest_tasks", status: "pending" },
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const createRes = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(createRes.status).toBe(201);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockInteractionService.create).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
action: "issue.thread_interaction_created",
|
|
|
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
interactionId: "interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionKind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("accepts suggested tasks and wakes created assignees plus the current assignee", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-1/accept")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({ selectedClientKeys: ["task-1"] });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" }),
|
|
|
|
|
"interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
{ selectedClientKeys: ["task-1"] },
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ userId: "local-board" }),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
1,
|
|
|
|
|
CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
source: "assignment",
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "issue_assigned",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "child-1",
|
|
|
|
|
mutation: "interaction_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
2,
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "issue_commented",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionId: "interaction-1",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: "comment-1",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("answers questions and emits a continuation wake", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-2/respond")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({
|
|
|
|
|
answers: [{ questionId: "scope", optionIds: ["phase-1"] }],
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockInteractionService.answerQuestions).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "issue_commented",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
interactionId: "interaction-2",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionKind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionStatus: "answered",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: "comment-2",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-2",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
action: "issue.thread_interaction_answered",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("accepts request confirmations and wakes the current assignee when configured for accept-only wakeups", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
|
|
|
interaction: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-3",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-3",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdIssues: [],
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-3/accept")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "issue_commented",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
interactionId: "interaction-3",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionKind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("wakes the returned agent when accepting an agent-authored confirmation from a board review assignee", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce(createIssue({
|
|
|
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
|
|
|
interaction: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-4",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-4",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
prompt: "Approve this plan?",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdIssues: [],
|
|
|
|
|
continuationIssue: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-4/accept")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "issue_commented",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionId: "interaction-4",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionKind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
|
|
|
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
action: "issue.updated",
|
|
|
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
source: "request_confirmation_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeAgentId: CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
_previous: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not emit a continuation wake when request confirmations are rejected", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.rejectInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-3",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-3",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
outcome: "rejected",
|
|
|
|
|
reason: "Needs changes",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-3/reject")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({ reason: "Needs changes" });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("does not emit an accept-only continuation wake for rejected suggested tasks", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
mockInteractionService.rejectInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
|
|
|
id: "interaction-5",
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
|
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-5",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
result: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
rejectionReason: "Not now",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-5/reject")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({ reason: "Not now" });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("allows agent-authored interaction creation and stamps the active run id", async () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
|
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
|
|
|
agentId: CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
|
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
|
|
|
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions")
|
|
|
|
|
.send({
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: "interaction:task-1",
|
|
|
|
|
payload: {
|
|
|
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockInteractionService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" }),
|
|
|
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
|
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
|
|
|
idempotencyKey: "interaction:task-1",
|
|
|
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
agentId: CREATED_AGENT_ID,
|
|
|
|
|
userId: null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|