mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-16 10:50:38 +09:00
[codex] harden authenticated routes and issue editor reliability (#3741)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company boundaries and role permissions correctly > - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows operators use while handling advisory and triage work > - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator needed it > - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee automatically instead of silently staying idle > - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current `master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests > - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base ## What Changed - Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity, approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace, portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and runtime-authz regression coverage. - Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies. - Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently fails or rejects the content. - Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions. - Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest `master` tip used for the PR base. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts` - Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing. ## Risks - Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants. - Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal markdown. - This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and did not run the full repository suite. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not need before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
parent
50cd76d8a3
commit
32a9165ddf
39 changed files with 3014 additions and 153 deletions
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
|
|||
import type { Request } from "express";
|
||||
import { forbidden, unauthorized } from "../errors.js";
|
||||
|
||||
export function assertAuthenticated(req: Request) {
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "none") {
|
||||
throw unauthorized();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function assertBoard(req: Request) {
|
||||
if (req.actor.type !== "board") {
|
||||
throw forbidden("Board access required");
|
||||
|
|
@ -16,9 +22,7 @@ export function assertInstanceAdmin(req: Request) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function assertCompanyAccess(req: Request, companyId: string) {
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "none") {
|
||||
throw unauthorized();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertAuthenticated(req);
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "agent" && req.actor.companyId !== companyId) {
|
||||
throw forbidden("Agent key cannot access another company");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,9 +35,7 @@ export function assertCompanyAccess(req: Request, companyId: string) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function getActorInfo(req: Request) {
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "none") {
|
||||
throw unauthorized();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertAuthenticated(req);
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "agent") {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
actorType: "agent" as const,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue