[codex] Add blocked inbox attention view (#5603)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through
company-scoped issues, comments, approvals, and execution workspaces.
> - Operators need the Inbox to show not only active work, but also
blocked work that may need human or agent attention.
> - The existing inbox experience did not have a dedicated blocked-work
surface, so blocked tasks were harder to triage and resume deliberately.
> - Backend consumers also needed a compact attention signal that
distinguishes actionable blockers from covered or waiting blocker
states.
> - This pull request adds a Blocked Inbox tab backed by issue
blocker-attention metadata, shared validators, and UI helpers.
> - The benefit is a clearer triage path for stalled or blocked
Paperclip work without exposing external wait internals in the
operator-facing UI.

## What Changed

- Added shared issue blocker-attention types, validators, and exports
for the API/UI contract.
- Added backend blocker-attention computation and issue route support
for blocked inbox data.
- Added the Blocked Inbox tab, blocked reason chips, filtering/search
UI, responsive layouts, and Storybook stories.
- Updated inbox helpers and page behavior so toolbar controls only
appear where they apply.
- Added coverage for shared validators, server blocker-attention
behavior, blocked inbox UI helpers/components, and the Inbox page.
- Added a screenshot helper script for the blocked inbox Storybook
stories.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by making urgency sorting deterministic
for null stop times, avoiding full blocked-inbox list enrichment for
counts, and hardening the screenshot helper.

## Verification

- Rebased the branch cleanly onto `public-gh/master`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include database migration files.
- Ran `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-blocker-attention.test.ts
ui/src/components/BlockedInboxView.test.tsx
ui/src/components/BlockedReasonChip.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/blockedInbox.test.ts ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`.
- Ran `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui
typecheck`.
- Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is scoped inbox/operator triage work and
does not duplicate a listed roadmap feature.
- Greptile Review is green on the latest head and all four Greptile
review threads are resolved.
- GitHub PR checks are green on the latest head: policy, security/snyk,
e2e, verify, Canary Dry Run, Greptile Review, and serialized server
suites 1/4 through 4/4.

## Risks

- Medium review surface because this touches the shared issue contract,
server issue services, and the Inbox UI together.
- Blocker-attention classification may need product tuning after
operators use it on real blocked queues.
- UI screenshots were not attached in this PR-opening pass; the branch
includes `scripts/screenshot-blocked-inbox.mjs` and Storybook stories
for visual capture.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with shell, git, GitHub CLI,
GitHub connector, and Paperclip API tool use. Reasoning mode: medium.
Context window: not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-05-13 16:41:36 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent d1a8c873b2
commit 4142559c37
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
24 changed files with 3737 additions and 115 deletions

View file

@ -1444,6 +1444,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
const parsedOffset = rawOffset !== undefined && /^\d+$/.test(rawOffset)
? Number.parseInt(rawOffset, 10)
: null;
const attention = req.query.attention as string | undefined;
if (assigneeUserFilterRaw === "me" && (!assigneeUserId || req.actor.type !== "board")) {
res.status(403).json({ error: "assigneeUserId=me requires board authentication" });
@ -1461,6 +1462,10 @@ export function issueRoutes(
res.status(403).json({ error: "unreadForUserId=me requires board authentication" });
return;
}
if (attention !== undefined && attention !== "blocked") {
res.status(400).json({ error: "attention must be 'blocked' when provided" });
return;
}
if (rawLimit !== undefined && (parsedLimit === null || !Number.isInteger(parsedLimit) || parsedLimit <= 0)) {
res.status(400).json({ error: `limit must be a positive integer up to ${ISSUE_LIST_MAX_LIMIT}` });
return;
@ -1472,6 +1477,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
const offset = parsedOffset ?? 0;
const result = await svc.list(companyId, {
attention: attention === "blocked" ? "blocked" : undefined,
status: req.query.status as string | undefined,
assigneeAgentId: req.query.assigneeAgentId as string | undefined,
participantAgentId: req.query.participantAgentId as string | undefined,
@ -1495,6 +1501,8 @@ export function issueRoutes(
includePluginOperations:
req.query.includePluginOperations === "true" || req.query.includePluginOperations === "1",
includeBlockedBy: req.query.includeBlockedBy === "true" || req.query.includeBlockedBy === "1",
includeBlockedInboxAttention:
req.query.includeBlockedInboxAttention === "true" || req.query.includeBlockedInboxAttention === "1",
q: req.query.q as string | undefined,
limit,
offset,
@ -1511,6 +1519,47 @@ export function issueRoutes(
})));
});
router.get("/companies/:companyId/issues/count", async (req, res) => {
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string;
assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);
const attention = req.query.attention as string | undefined;
if (attention !== "blocked") {
res.status(400).json({ error: "issues/count currently requires attention=blocked" });
return;
}
if (req.query.limit !== undefined || req.query.offset !== undefined) {
res.status(400).json({ error: "issues/count does not accept limit or offset" });
return;
}
const count = await svc.count(companyId, {
attention: "blocked",
status: req.query.status as string | undefined,
assigneeAgentId: req.query.assigneeAgentId as string | undefined,
participantAgentId: req.query.participantAgentId as string | undefined,
assigneeUserId: req.query.assigneeUserId as string | undefined,
projectId: req.query.projectId as string | undefined,
workspaceId: req.query.workspaceId as string | undefined,
executionWorkspaceId: req.query.executionWorkspaceId as string | undefined,
parentId: req.query.parentId as string | undefined,
descendantOf: req.query.descendantOf as string | undefined,
labelId: req.query.labelId as string | undefined,
originKind: req.query.originKind as string | undefined,
originKindPrefix: req.query.originKindPrefix as string | undefined,
originId: req.query.originId as string | undefined,
includeRoutineExecutions:
req.query.includeRoutineExecutions === "true" || req.query.includeRoutineExecutions === "1",
excludeRoutineExecutions:
req.query.excludeRoutineExecutions === "true" || req.query.excludeRoutineExecutions === "1",
includePluginOperations:
req.query.includePluginOperations === "true" || req.query.includePluginOperations === "1",
includeBlockedBy: true,
includeBlockedInboxAttention: true,
q: req.query.q as string | undefined,
});
res.json({ count });
});
router.get("/companies/:companyId/labels", async (req, res) => {
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string;
assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);