Improve operator workflow QoL (#5291)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane operators use repeatedly to supervise
agent companies.
> - Common operator workflows depend on fast scanning of inboxes, issue
sidebars, workspaces, cost totals, and runtime services.
> - Several small UI and service gaps made those workflows slower or
less clear.
> - This pull request groups the operator-facing QoL changes that can
stand alone from recovery and adapter work.
> - The benefit is a denser, clearer board experience for issue triage
and workspace operation.

## What Changed

- Added inbox assignee/project grouping and issue list token/runtime
totals.
- Improved issue properties with removable blocker chips and workspace
task links.
- Improved execution workspace layout, runtime controls, issues tab
default, and stopped-port reuse behavior.
- Added mobile markdown/routine dialog fixes, page title company names,
sidebar polish, and dashboard run task label cleanup.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts`

## Risks

- Medium UI risk because this touches several operator surfaces. The
branch is intentionally grouped around workflow/QoL files and keeps the
file count below the Greptile limit.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with
shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

ui/src/api/issues.ts

@@ -174,7 +174,10 @@ export const issuesApi = {
   getComment: (id: string, commentId: string) =>
     api.get<IssueComment>(`/issues/${id}/comments/${commentId}`),
   listFeedbackVotes: (id: string) => api.get<FeedbackVote[]>(`/issues/${id}/feedback-votes`),
-  getCostSummary: (id: string) => api.get<IssueCostSummary>(`/issues/${id}/cost-summary`),
+  getCostSummary: (id: string, options: { excludeRoot?: boolean } = {}) => {
+    const qs = options.excludeRoot ? "?excludeRoot=true" : "";
+    return api.get<IssueCostSummary>(`/issues/${id}/cost-summary${qs}`);
+  },
   listFeedbackTraces: (id: string, filters?: Record<string, string | boolean | undefined>) => {
     const params = new URLSearchParams();
     for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(filters ?? {})) {