Improve operator workflow QoL (#5291)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane operators use repeatedly to supervise
agent companies.
> - Common operator workflows depend on fast scanning of inboxes, issue
sidebars, workspaces, cost totals, and runtime services.
> - Several small UI and service gaps made those workflows slower or
less clear.
> - This pull request groups the operator-facing QoL changes that can
stand alone from recovery and adapter work.
> - The benefit is a denser, clearer board experience for issue triage
and workspace operation.

## What Changed

- Added inbox assignee/project grouping and issue list token/runtime
totals.
- Improved issue properties with removable blocker chips and workspace
task links.
- Improved execution workspace layout, runtime controls, issues tab
default, and stopped-port reuse behavior.
- Added mobile markdown/routine dialog fixes, page title company names,
sidebar polish, and dashboard run task label cleanup.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts`

## Risks

- Medium UI risk because this touches several operator surfaces. The
branch is intentionally grouped around workflow/QoL files and keeps the
file count below the Greptile limit.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with
shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx

@@ -60,4 +60,46 @@ describe("IssueBlockedNotice", () => {
     expect(node.textContent).not.toContain("Work on this issue is blocked until");
     expect(node.querySelector('[data-successful-run-handoff="required"]')).not.toBeNull();
   });
+
+  it("does not render when the issue is done even if a stale handoff state is required", () => {
+    const node = render(
+      <IssueBlockedNotice
+        issueStatus="done"
+        blockers={[]}
+        agentName="CodexCoder"
+        successfulRunHandoff={{
+          state: "required",
+          required: true,
+          sourceRunId: "12345678-aaaa-bbbb-cccc-123456789abc",
+          correctiveRunId: null,
+          assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
+          detectedProgressSummary: "Updated the plan and left follow-up work.",
+          createdAt: "2026-05-01T00:00:00.000Z",
+        }}
+      />,
+    );
+
+    expect(node.textContent).toBe("");
+  });
+
+  it("does not render when the issue is cancelled even if blockers remain", () => {
+    const node = render(
+      <IssueBlockedNotice
+        issueStatus="cancelled"
+        blockers={[
+          {
+            id: "blocker-1",
+            identifier: "PAP-123",
+            title: "Blocker",
+            status: "in_progress",
+            priority: "medium",
+            assigneeAgentId: null,
+            assigneeUserId: null,
+          },
+        ]}
+      />,
+    );
+
+    expect(node.textContent).toBe("");
+  });
 });