mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-16 19:00:38 +09:00
[codex] Add issue monitor liveness controls (#4988)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies where work must stay observable, governable, and recoverable. > - The task/heartbeat subsystem owns agent execution continuity, issue state transitions, and visible recovery behavior. > - Waiting on an external service is not the same as being blocked when the assignee still owns a future check. > - The gap was that agents had no first-class one-shot monitor state for external-service waits, so recovery could look stalled or require ad hoc comments. > - This pull request adds bounded issue monitors that can wake the owner, clear exhausted waits, and produce explicit recovery behavior. > - It also surfaces monitor status in the board UI and documents when to use monitors versus `blocked`. > - The benefit is clearer liveness semantics for asynchronous waits without weakening single-assignee task ownership. ## What Changed - Added issue monitor fields, shared types, validators, constants, and an idempotent `0075` migration for scheduled monitor state. - Added server-side monitor scheduling, dispatch, recovery bounds, activity logging, and external-ref redaction. - Added board/agent route coverage for monitor permissions and child monitor scheduling. - Added issue detail/property UI for monitor state, a monitor activity card, and Storybook stories for review surfaces. - Documented monitor semantics and recovery policy behavior in `doc/execution-semantics.md`. - Addressed Greptile review feedback by preserving monitor state in skipped-stage builders and making board monitor saves send `scheduledBy: "board"`. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-monitor-scheduler.test.ts server/src/__tests__/recovery-classifiers.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueMonitorActivityCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/lib/activity-format.test.ts` - First run passed 5 files and failed to collect 2 server suites because the worktree was missing the optional `acpx/runtime` dependency. - After `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`, reran the 2 failed suites successfully. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-monitor-scheduler.test.ts server/src/__tests__/recovery-classifiers.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueMonitorActivityCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - Storybook screenshot captured from `http://127.0.0.1:6006/iframe.html?viewMode=story&id=product-issue-monitor-surfaces--monitor-surfaces` with Playwright. ## Screenshots  ## Risks - Medium: this changes heartbeat recovery behavior for scheduled external-service waits, so regressions could affect wake timing or recovery issue creation. - Migration risk is reduced by using `IF NOT EXISTS` for the new issue monitor columns and index. - External monitor references are treated as secret-adjacent and are intentionally omitted from visible activity/wake payloads. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with repository tool use and terminal execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots or Storybook review surfaces - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
parent
76f09c8eb6
commit
57229d0f24
32 changed files with 19324 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -221,9 +221,39 @@ export type IssueExecutionPolicyMode = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_POLICY_MODES)[num
|
|||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_STAGE_TYPES = ["review", "approval"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionStageType = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_STAGE_TYPES)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_MONITOR_SCHEDULED_BY = ["assignee", "board"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueMonitorScheduledBy = (typeof ISSUE_MONITOR_SCHEDULED_BY)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_KINDS = ["external_service"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionMonitorKind = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_KINDS)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_RECOVERY_POLICIES = [
|
||||
"wake_owner",
|
||||
"create_recovery_issue",
|
||||
"escalate_to_board",
|
||||
] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionMonitorRecoveryPolicy =
|
||||
(typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_RECOVERY_POLICIES)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_STATE_STATUSES = ["idle", "pending", "changes_requested", "completed"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionStateStatus = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_STATE_STATUSES)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_STATE_STATUSES = ["scheduled", "triggered", "cleared"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionMonitorStateStatus = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_STATE_STATUSES)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_CLEAR_REASONS = [
|
||||
"manual",
|
||||
"triggered",
|
||||
"done",
|
||||
"cancelled",
|
||||
"invalid_status",
|
||||
"invalid_assignee",
|
||||
"dispatch_skipped",
|
||||
"timeout_exceeded",
|
||||
"max_attempts_exhausted",
|
||||
] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionMonitorClearReason = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_MONITOR_CLEAR_REASONS)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
export const ISSUE_EXECUTION_DECISION_OUTCOMES = ["approved", "changes_requested"] as const;
|
||||
export type IssueExecutionDecisionOutcome = (typeof ISSUE_EXECUTION_DECISION_OUTCOMES)[number];
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue