Harden control-plane safety and issue identifiers (#5292)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip relies on issue identifiers, execution policies, and agent
heartbeat rules to keep autonomous work auditable.
> - Safety checks need to reject ambiguous agent handoffs, and
identifier parsing needs to support Cloud tenant prefixes.
> - Agent instructions also need to make final-disposition rules
explicit so work does not stall in vague states.
> - This pull request isolates backend correctness and governance
hardening from the UI and recovery-system-notice branches.
> - The benefit is safer in-review transitions, better identifier
compatibility, and clearer agent operating contracts.

## What Changed

- Fixed run-aware confirmation ordering and interrupted-run state
cleanup.
- Added Cloud tenant identity bootstrap and alphanumeric issue
identifier support across shared parsing and server routes.
- Guarded agent-authored `in_review` updates unless a real review path
exists.
- Tightened heartbeat disposition instructions in adapter
utilities/default AGENTS/Paperclip skill.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-references.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-identifier-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` initially had the first
execution-policy test hit Vitest's 5s timeout under the parallel bundle
while the rest passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts
--testTimeout=20000` passed with 10/10 tests.

- Follow-up: `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` passed.
- Follow-up: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed.
- Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts` passed.
- Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-reference.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-timeline-events.test.ts` passed.

## Risks

- Medium control-plane risk: in-review update validation changes agent
behavior. The error message is explicit and tests cover allowed review
paths.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with
shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts

@@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ describe("renderPaperclipWakePrompt", () => {
   it("keeps the default local-agent prompt action-oriented", () => {
     expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("Start actionable work in this heartbeat");
     expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("do not stop at a plan");
+    expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("clear final disposition");
+    expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("evidence, not valid liveness paths by themselves");
+    expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("keep `in_progress` only when a live continuation path exists");
     expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("Prefer the smallest verification that proves the change");
     expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("Use child issues");
     expect(DEFAULT_PAPERCLIP_AGENT_PROMPT_TEMPLATE).toContain("instead of polling agents, sessions, or processes");
@@ -451,8 +454,10 @@ describe("renderPaperclipWakePrompt", () => {
 
     expect(prompt).toContain("## Paperclip Wake Payload");
     expect(prompt).toContain("Execution contract: take concrete action in this heartbeat");
-    expect(prompt).toContain("use child issues instead of polling");
-    expect(prompt).toContain("mark blocked work with the unblock owner/action");
+    expect(prompt).toContain("clear final disposition");
+    expect(prompt).toContain("evidence, not valid liveness paths by themselves");
+    expect(prompt).toContain("Use child issues for long or parallel delegated work instead of polling");
+    expect(prompt).toContain("named unblock owner/action");
   });
 
   it("renders planning-mode directives for assignment and comment wakes", () => {