mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-14 01:50:39 +09:00
Harden control-plane safety and issue identifiers (#5292)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip relies on issue identifiers, execution policies, and agent heartbeat rules to keep autonomous work auditable. > - Safety checks need to reject ambiguous agent handoffs, and identifier parsing needs to support Cloud tenant prefixes. > - Agent instructions also need to make final-disposition rules explicit so work does not stall in vague states. > - This pull request isolates backend correctness and governance hardening from the UI and recovery-system-notice branches. > - The benefit is safer in-review transitions, better identifier compatibility, and clearer agent operating contracts. ## What Changed - Fixed run-aware confirmation ordering and interrupted-run state cleanup. - Added Cloud tenant identity bootstrap and alphanumeric issue identifier support across shared parsing and server routes. - Guarded agent-authored `in_review` updates unless a real review path exists. - Tightened heartbeat disposition instructions in adapter utilities/default AGENTS/Paperclip skill. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-references.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-identifier-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` initially had the first execution-policy test hit Vitest's 5s timeout under the parallel bundle while the rest passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts --testTimeout=20000` passed with 10/10 tests. - Follow-up: `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-reference.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-timeline-events.test.ts` passed. ## Risks - Medium control-plane risk: in-review update validation changes agent behavior. The error message is explicit and tests cover allowed review paths. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1b30c9f35
commit
68f69975a4
17 changed files with 875 additions and 90 deletions
|
|
@ -330,11 +330,24 @@ describe("LiveUpdatesProvider issue invalidation", () => {
|
|||
executionAgentNameKey: "codexcoder",
|
||||
executionLockedAt: new Date("2026-04-08T21:00:00.000Z"),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.detail("issue-1")), {
|
||||
id: "issue-1",
|
||||
identifier: "PAP-759",
|
||||
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
executionRunId: "run-1",
|
||||
executionAgentNameKey: "codexcoder",
|
||||
executionLockedAt: new Date("2026-04-08T21:00:00.000Z"),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.activeRun("PAP-759")), {
|
||||
id: "run-1",
|
||||
}],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.activeRun("issue-1")), {
|
||||
id: "run-1",
|
||||
}],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns("PAP-759")), [{ id: "run-1" }]],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns("issue-1")), [{ id: "run-1" }]],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.runs("PAP-759")), [{ runId: "run-1" }]],
|
||||
[JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.runs("issue-1")), [{ runId: "run-1" }]],
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const queryClient = {
|
||||
invalidateQueries: (input: unknown) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -377,6 +390,9 @@ describe("LiveUpdatesProvider issue invalidation", () => {
|
|||
expect(invalidations).toContainEqual({
|
||||
queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun("PAP-759"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(invalidations).toContainEqual({
|
||||
queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun("issue-1"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.activeRun("PAP-759")))).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns("PAP-759")))).toEqual([]);
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.detail("PAP-759")))).toMatchObject({
|
||||
|
|
@ -384,6 +400,13 @@ describe("LiveUpdatesProvider issue invalidation", () => {
|
|||
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
||||
executionLockedAt: null,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.activeRun("issue-1")))).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns("issue-1")))).toEqual([]);
|
||||
expect(cache.get(JSON.stringify(queryKeys.issues.detail("issue-1")))).toMatchObject({
|
||||
executionRunId: null,
|
||||
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
||||
executionLockedAt: null,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("ignores run status events for other issues", () => {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -279,25 +279,29 @@ function invalidateVisibleIssueRunQueries(
|
|||
|
||||
const status = readString(payload.status);
|
||||
if (runId && status && TERMINAL_RUN_STATUSES.has(status)) {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(context.routeIssueRef),
|
||||
(current: LiveRunForIssue[] | undefined) => removeLiveRunById(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.activeRun(context.routeIssueRef),
|
||||
(current: ActiveRunForIssue | null | undefined) => (current?.id === runId ? null : current),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.detail(context.routeIssueRef),
|
||||
(current: Issue | undefined) => clearIssueExecutionRun(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (const issueRef of context.issueRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueRef),
|
||||
(current: LiveRunForIssue[] | undefined) => removeLiveRunById(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueRef),
|
||||
(current: ActiveRunForIssue | null | undefined) => (current?.id === runId ? null : current),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.detail(issueRef),
|
||||
(current: Issue | undefined) => clearIssueExecutionRun(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(context.routeIssueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(context.routeIssueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(context.routeIssueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(context.routeIssueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(context.routeIssueRef) });
|
||||
for (const issueRef of context.issueRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(issueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(issueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(issueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueRef) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueRef) });
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ import {
|
|||
type IssueChatComment,
|
||||
type IssueChatLinkedRun,
|
||||
} from "./issue-chat-messages";
|
||||
import type { SuggestTasksInteraction } from "./issue-thread-interactions";
|
||||
import type {
|
||||
RequestConfirmationInteraction,
|
||||
SuggestTasksInteraction,
|
||||
} from "./issue-thread-interactions";
|
||||
import type { IssueTimelineEvent } from "./issue-timeline-events";
|
||||
import type { LiveRunForIssue } from "../api/heartbeats";
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -89,6 +92,34 @@ function createInteraction(
|
|||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function createRequestConfirmation(
|
||||
overrides: Partial<RequestConfirmationInteraction> = {},
|
||||
): RequestConfirmationInteraction {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: "confirmation-1",
|
||||
companyId: "company-1",
|
||||
issueId: "issue-1",
|
||||
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
||||
title: "Approve the plan",
|
||||
summary: "Review and approve the latest plan.",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
||||
createdByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
createdByUserId: null,
|
||||
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
||||
resolvedByUserId: null,
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
resolvedAt: null,
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Approve the plan?",
|
||||
},
|
||||
result: null,
|
||||
...overrides,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
describe("buildAssistantPartsFromTranscript", () => {
|
||||
it("maps assistant text, reasoning, and tool activity while omitting noisy stderr", () => {
|
||||
const result = buildAssistantPartsFromTranscript([
|
||||
|
|
@ -438,6 +469,130 @@ describe("buildIssueChatMessages", () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("places request confirmations after later same-run handoff status and comment", () => {
|
||||
const messages = buildIssueChatMessages({
|
||||
comments: [
|
||||
createComment({
|
||||
id: "comment-handoff",
|
||||
authorAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
authorUserId: null,
|
||||
body: "Ready for approval.",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:03:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:03:00.000Z"),
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
runAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
createComment({
|
||||
id: "comment-user-reply",
|
||||
body: "Approved.",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:04:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:04:00.000Z"),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
interactions: [
|
||||
createRequestConfirmation({
|
||||
id: "confirmation-1",
|
||||
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
||||
status: "expired",
|
||||
result: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
outcome: "superseded_by_comment",
|
||||
commentId: "comment-user-reply",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
timelineEvents: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "event-in-review",
|
||||
actorType: "agent",
|
||||
actorId: "agent-1",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
statusChange: {
|
||||
from: "in_progress",
|
||||
to: "in_review",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
linkedRuns: [],
|
||||
liveRuns: [],
|
||||
currentUserId: "user-1",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(messages.map((message) => `${message.role}:${message.id}`)).toEqual([
|
||||
"system:activity:event-in-review",
|
||||
"assistant:comment-handoff",
|
||||
"system:interaction:confirmation-1",
|
||||
"user:comment-user-reply",
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("keeps request confirmations chronological without later same-run handoff evidence", () => {
|
||||
const messages = buildIssueChatMessages({
|
||||
comments: [
|
||||
createComment({
|
||||
id: "comment-later",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
interactions: [
|
||||
createRequestConfirmation({
|
||||
id: "confirmation-1",
|
||||
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
timelineEvents: [],
|
||||
linkedRuns: [],
|
||||
liveRuns: [],
|
||||
currentUserId: "user-1",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(messages.map((message) => `${message.role}:${message.id}`)).toEqual([
|
||||
"system:interaction:confirmation-1",
|
||||
"user:comment-later",
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not move request confirmations past unrelated comments before same-run handoff", () => {
|
||||
const messages = buildIssueChatMessages({
|
||||
comments: [
|
||||
createComment({
|
||||
id: "comment-user-reply",
|
||||
body: "I have a question first.",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
createComment({
|
||||
id: "comment-handoff",
|
||||
authorAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
authorUserId: null,
|
||||
body: "Ready for approval.",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:03:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T12:03:00.000Z"),
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
runAgentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
interactions: [
|
||||
createRequestConfirmation({
|
||||
id: "confirmation-1",
|
||||
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
timelineEvents: [],
|
||||
linkedRuns: [],
|
||||
liveRuns: [],
|
||||
currentUserId: "user-1",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(messages.map((message) => `${message.role}:${message.id}`)).toEqual([
|
||||
"system:interaction:confirmation-1",
|
||||
"user:comment-user-reply",
|
||||
"assistant:comment-handoff",
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("keeps succeeded runs as assistant messages when transcript output exists", () => {
|
||||
const agentMap = new Map<string, Agent>([["agent-1", createAgent("agent-1", "CodexCoder")]]);
|
||||
const messages = buildIssueChatMessages({
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ type MessageWithOrder = {
|
|||
message: ThreadMessage;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
type SortBoundaryItem = {
|
||||
createdAtMs: number;
|
||||
runId?: string | null;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export interface StableThreadMessageCacheEntry {
|
||||
fingerprint: string;
|
||||
message: ThreadMessage;
|
||||
|
|
@ -145,6 +150,64 @@ function sortByCreated<T extends { createdAt: Date | string; id: string }>(items
|
|||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function latestSameRunHandoffTimestamp(args: {
|
||||
interactionCreatedAtMs: number;
|
||||
sourceRunId: string;
|
||||
comments: readonly IssueChatComment[];
|
||||
timelineEvents: readonly IssueTimelineEvent[];
|
||||
linkedRuns: readonly IssueChatLinkedRun[];
|
||||
liveRuns: readonly LiveRunForIssue[];
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
const {
|
||||
interactionCreatedAtMs,
|
||||
sourceRunId,
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
timelineEvents,
|
||||
linkedRuns,
|
||||
liveRuns,
|
||||
} = args;
|
||||
const handoffItems: SortBoundaryItem[] = [
|
||||
...comments.map((comment) => ({
|
||||
createdAtMs: toTimestamp(comment.createdAt),
|
||||
runId: comment.runId ?? null,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
...timelineEvents.map((event) => ({
|
||||
createdAtMs: toTimestamp(event.createdAt),
|
||||
runId: event.runId ?? null,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
];
|
||||
const barrierItems: SortBoundaryItem[] = [
|
||||
...handoffItems,
|
||||
...linkedRuns.map((run) => ({
|
||||
createdAtMs: toTimestamp(runTimestamp(run)),
|
||||
runId: run.runId,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
...liveRuns.map((run) => ({
|
||||
createdAtMs: toTimestamp(run.startedAt ?? run.createdAt),
|
||||
runId: run.id,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
];
|
||||
const barrierAtMs = barrierItems
|
||||
.filter((item) => item.createdAtMs > interactionCreatedAtMs && item.runId !== sourceRunId)
|
||||
.reduce<number | null>(
|
||||
(earliest, item) =>
|
||||
earliest === null ? item.createdAtMs : Math.min(earliest, item.createdAtMs),
|
||||
null,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
return handoffItems
|
||||
.filter((item) =>
|
||||
item.createdAtMs > interactionCreatedAtMs
|
||||
&& item.runId === sourceRunId
|
||||
&& (barrierAtMs === null || item.createdAtMs < barrierAtMs)
|
||||
)
|
||||
.reduce<number | null>(
|
||||
(latest, item) =>
|
||||
latest === null ? item.createdAtMs : Math.max(latest, item.createdAtMs),
|
||||
null,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function normalizeJsonValue(input: unknown): JsonValue {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
input === null ||
|
||||
|
|
@ -832,8 +895,19 @@ export function buildIssueChatMessages(args: {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (const interaction of sortByCreated(interactions)) {
|
||||
const createdAtMs = toTimestamp(interaction.createdAt);
|
||||
const handoffAtMs = interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && interaction.sourceRunId
|
||||
? latestSameRunHandoffTimestamp({
|
||||
interactionCreatedAtMs: createdAtMs,
|
||||
sourceRunId: interaction.sourceRunId,
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
timelineEvents,
|
||||
linkedRuns,
|
||||
liveRuns,
|
||||
})
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
orderedMessages.push({
|
||||
createdAtMs: toTimestamp(interaction.createdAt),
|
||||
createdAtMs: handoffAtMs ?? createdAtMs,
|
||||
order: 2,
|
||||
message: createInteractionMessage(interaction),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ describe("issue-reference", () => {
|
|||
it("extracts issue ids from company-scoped issue paths", () => {
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/PAP/issues/PAP-1271")).toBe("PAP-1271");
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/PAP/issues/pap-1272")).toBe("PAP-1272");
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/issues/pc1a2-7")).toBe("PC1A2-7");
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/PC1A2/issues/pc1a2-7")).toBe("PC1A2-7");
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/issues/PAP-1179")).toBe("PAP-1179");
|
||||
expect(parseIssuePathIdFromPath("/issues/:id")).toBeNull();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ describe("extractIssueTimelineEvents", () => {
|
|||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
actorType: "user",
|
||||
actorId: "local-board",
|
||||
runId: null,
|
||||
statusChange: {
|
||||
from: "todo",
|
||||
to: "in_progress",
|
||||
|
|
@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ describe("extractIssueTimelineEvents", () => {
|
|||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
||||
actorType: "user",
|
||||
actorId: "local-board",
|
||||
runId: null,
|
||||
assigneeChange: {
|
||||
from: {
|
||||
agentId: "agent-1",
|
||||
|
|
@ -118,6 +120,7 @@ describe("extractIssueTimelineEvents", () => {
|
|||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
actorType: "agent",
|
||||
actorId: "agent-1",
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
statusChange: {
|
||||
from: "done",
|
||||
to: "todo",
|
||||
|
|
@ -157,6 +160,7 @@ describe("extractIssueTimelineEvents", () => {
|
|||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
actorType: "agent",
|
||||
actorId: "agent-1",
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
commentId: "comment-1",
|
||||
followUpRequested: true,
|
||||
statusChange: {
|
||||
|
|
@ -194,6 +198,7 @@ describe("extractIssueTimelineEvents", () => {
|
|||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
||||
actorType: "agent",
|
||||
actorId: "agent-1",
|
||||
runId: "run-1",
|
||||
commentId: "comment-1",
|
||||
followUpRequested: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ export interface IssueTimelineEvent {
|
|||
createdAt: Date | string;
|
||||
actorType: ActivityEvent["actorType"];
|
||||
actorId: string;
|
||||
runId?: string | null;
|
||||
statusChange?: {
|
||||
from: string | null;
|
||||
to: string | null;
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ export function extractIssueTimelineEvents(activity: ActivityEvent[] | null | un
|
|||
createdAt: event.createdAt,
|
||||
actorType: event.actorType,
|
||||
actorId: event.actorId,
|
||||
runId: event.runId ?? null,
|
||||
commentId,
|
||||
followUpRequested: true,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
@ -81,6 +83,7 @@ export function extractIssueTimelineEvents(activity: ActivityEvent[] | null | un
|
|||
createdAt: event.createdAt,
|
||||
actorType: event.actorType,
|
||||
actorId: event.actorId,
|
||||
runId: event.runId ?? null,
|
||||
};
|
||||
if (details.followUpRequested === true || details.resumeIntent === true) {
|
||||
timelineEvent.followUpRequested = true;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -217,6 +217,15 @@ function resolveRunningIssueRun(
|
|||
: (liveRuns ?? []).find((run) => run.status === "running") ?? null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function dedupeLiveRunsById(liveRuns: readonly LiveRunForIssue[]) {
|
||||
const seen = new Set<string>();
|
||||
return liveRuns.filter((run) => {
|
||||
if (seen.has(run.id)) return false;
|
||||
seen.add(run.id);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function readIssueRunStateFromCache(queryClient: QueryClient, issueId: string) {
|
||||
const liveRuns = queryClient.getQueryData<LiveRunForIssue[]>(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1524,23 +1533,36 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
[comments, optimisticComments],
|
||||
);
|
||||
const breadcrumbTitle = issue?.title ?? issueId ?? "Issue";
|
||||
const issueCacheRefs = useMemo(() => {
|
||||
const refs = new Set<string>();
|
||||
if (issueId) refs.add(issueId);
|
||||
if (issue?.id) refs.add(issue.id);
|
||||
if (issue?.identifier) refs.add(issue.identifier);
|
||||
return [...refs];
|
||||
}, [issue?.id, issue?.identifier, issueId]);
|
||||
|
||||
const invalidateIssueDetail = useCallback(() => {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(issueId!) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.interactions(issueId!) });
|
||||
}, [issueId, queryClient]);
|
||||
for (const ref of issueCacheRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(ref) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(ref) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.interactions(ref) });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, [issueCacheRefs, queryClient]);
|
||||
const invalidateIssueThreadLazily = useCallback(() => {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(issueId!), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.interactions(issueId!), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
}, [issueId, queryClient]);
|
||||
for (const ref of issueCacheRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(ref), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activity(ref), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.interactions(ref), refetchType: "inactive" });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, [issueCacheRefs, queryClient]);
|
||||
|
||||
const invalidateIssueRunState = useCallback(() => {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(issueId!) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId!) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueId!) });
|
||||
}, [issueId, queryClient]);
|
||||
for (const ref of issueCacheRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(ref) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(ref) });
|
||||
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(ref) });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, [issueCacheRefs, queryClient]);
|
||||
|
||||
const removeCommentFromCache = useCallback((commentId: string) => {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData<InfiniteData<IssueComment[], string | null> | undefined>(
|
||||
|
|
@ -2203,18 +2225,26 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
const interruptQueuedComment = useMutation({
|
||||
mutationFn: (runId: string) => heartbeatsApi.cancel(runId),
|
||||
onMutate: async (runId) => {
|
||||
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(issueId!) });
|
||||
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId!) });
|
||||
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueId!) });
|
||||
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!) });
|
||||
await Promise.all(issueCacheRefs.flatMap((ref) => [
|
||||
queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.runs(ref) }),
|
||||
queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(ref) }),
|
||||
queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.activeRun(ref) }),
|
||||
queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: queryKeys.issues.detail(ref) }),
|
||||
]));
|
||||
|
||||
const previousRuns = queryClient.getQueryData<RunForIssue[]>(queryKeys.issues.runs(issueId!));
|
||||
const previousLiveRuns = queryClient.getQueryData<LiveRunForIssue[]>(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId!));
|
||||
const previousActiveRun = queryClient.getQueryData<ActiveRunForIssue | null>(queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueId!));
|
||||
const previousIssue = queryClient.getQueryData<Issue>(queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!));
|
||||
const previousRunState = issueCacheRefs.map((ref) => ({
|
||||
ref,
|
||||
runs: queryClient.getQueryData<RunForIssue[]>(queryKeys.issues.runs(ref)),
|
||||
liveRuns: queryClient.getQueryData<LiveRunForIssue[]>(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(ref)),
|
||||
activeRun: queryClient.getQueryData<ActiveRunForIssue | null>(queryKeys.issues.activeRun(ref)),
|
||||
issue: queryClient.getQueryData<Issue>(queryKeys.issues.detail(ref)),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const previousLocalQueuedCommentRunIds = locallyQueuedCommentRunIds;
|
||||
const liveRunList = previousLiveRuns ?? [];
|
||||
const cachedActiveRun = previousActiveRun ?? null;
|
||||
const cachedActiveRun =
|
||||
previousRunState.find((state) => state.activeRun?.id === runId)?.activeRun ??
|
||||
previousRunState.find((state) => state.activeRun)?.activeRun ??
|
||||
null;
|
||||
const liveRunList = dedupeLiveRunsById(previousRunState.flatMap((state) => state.liveRuns ?? []));
|
||||
const runningIssueRun = resolveRunningIssueRun(cachedActiveRun, liveRunList);
|
||||
const targetRun =
|
||||
cachedActiveRun?.id === runId
|
||||
|
|
@ -2223,34 +2253,35 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
|
||||
if (targetRun) {
|
||||
const interruptedAt = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData<RunForIssue[] | undefined>(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.runs(issueId!),
|
||||
(current) => upsertInterruptedRun(current, targetRun, interruptedAt),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (const ref of issueCacheRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData<RunForIssue[] | undefined>(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.runs(ref),
|
||||
(current) => upsertInterruptedRun(current, targetRun, interruptedAt),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId!),
|
||||
(current: LiveRunForIssue[] | undefined) => removeLiveRunById(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueId!),
|
||||
(current: ActiveRunForIssue | null | undefined) => (current?.id === runId ? null : current),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!),
|
||||
(current: Issue | undefined) => clearIssueExecutionRun(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (const ref of issueCacheRefs) {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(ref),
|
||||
(current: LiveRunForIssue[] | undefined) => removeLiveRunById(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.activeRun(ref),
|
||||
(current: ActiveRunForIssue | null | undefined) => (current?.id === runId ? null : current),
|
||||
);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(
|
||||
queryKeys.issues.detail(ref),
|
||||
(current: Issue | undefined) => clearIssueExecutionRun(current, runId),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
setLocallyQueuedCommentRunIds((current) => {
|
||||
const next = new Map([...current].filter(([, targetRunId]) => targetRunId !== runId));
|
||||
return next.size === current.size ? current : next;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
previousRuns,
|
||||
previousLiveRuns,
|
||||
previousActiveRun,
|
||||
previousIssue,
|
||||
previousRunState,
|
||||
previousLocalQueuedCommentRunIds,
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
|
@ -2264,10 +2295,12 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
onError: (err, _runId, context) => {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.runs(issueId!), context?.previousRuns);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(issueId!), context?.previousLiveRuns);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.activeRun(issueId!), context?.previousActiveRun);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail(issueId!), context?.previousIssue);
|
||||
for (const state of context?.previousRunState ?? []) {
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.runs(state.ref), state.runs);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.liveRuns(state.ref), state.liveRuns);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.activeRun(state.ref), state.activeRun);
|
||||
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail(state.ref), state.issue);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (context?.previousLocalQueuedCommentRunIds) {
|
||||
setLocallyQueuedCommentRunIds(context.previousLocalQueuedCommentRunIds);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue