mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-16 02:40:39 +09:00
Harden API route authorization boundaries (#4122)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - The REST API is the control-plane boundary for companies, agents, plugins, adapters, costs, invites, and issue mutations. > - Several routes still relied on broad board or company access checks without consistently enforcing the narrower actor, company, and active-checkout boundaries those operations require. > - That can allow agents or non-admin users to mutate sensitive resources outside the intended governance path. > - This pull request hardens the route authorization layer and adds regression coverage for the audited API surfaces. > - The benefit is tighter multi-company isolation, safer plugin and adapter administration, and stronger enforcement of active issue ownership. ## What Changed - Added route-level authorization checks for budgets, plugin administration/scoped routes, adapter management, company import/export, direct agent creation, invite test resolution, and issue mutation/write surfaces. - Enforced active checkout ownership for agent-authenticated issue mutations, while preserving explicit management overrides for permitted managers. - Restricted sensitive adapter and plugin management operations to instance-admin or properly scoped actors. - Tightened company portability and invite probing routes so agents cannot cross company boundaries. - Updated access constants and the Company Access UI copy for the new active-checkout management grant. - Added focused regression tests covering cross-company denial, agent self-mutation denial, admin-only operations, and active checkout ownership. - Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and fixed validation fallout from the rebase: heartbeat-context route ordering and a company import/export e2e fixture that now opts out of direct-hire approval before using direct agent creation. - Updated onboarding and signoff e2e setup to create seed agents through `/agent-hires` plus board approval, so they remain compatible with the approval-gated new-agent default. - Addressed Greptile feedback by removing a duplicate company export API alias, avoiding N+1 reporting-chain lookups in active-checkout override checks, allowing agent mutations on unassigned `in_progress` issues, and blocking NAT64 invite-probe targets. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-test-resolution-route.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-adapter-validation-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/invite-test-resolution-route.test.ts` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm --filter server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter ui typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm test:e2e -- tests/e2e/onboarding.spec.ts tests/e2e/signoff-policy.spec.ts` - `pnpm test:e2e -- tests/e2e/signoff-policy.spec.ts` - `pnpm test:run` was also run. It failed under default full-suite parallelism with two order-dependent failures in `plugin-routes-authz.test.ts` and `routines-e2e.test.ts`; both files passed when rerun directly together with `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`. ## Risks - Medium risk: this changes authorization behavior across multiple sensitive API surfaces, so callers that depended on broad board/company access may now receive `403` or `409` until they use the correct governance path. - Direct agent creation now respects the company-level board-approval requirement; integrations that need pending hires should use `/api/companies/:companyId/agent-hires`. - Active in-progress issue mutations now require checkout ownership or an explicit management override, which may reveal workflow assumptions in older automation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-using workflow with local shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and repository tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
parent
549ef11c14
commit
7a329fb8bb
22 changed files with 1903 additions and 138 deletions
|
|
@ -407,7 +407,39 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function assertAgentRunCheckoutOwnership(
|
||||
async function hasActiveCheckoutManagementOverride(
|
||||
actorAgentId: string,
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
assigneeAgentId: string,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const allowedByGrant = await access.hasPermission(
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
"agent",
|
||||
actorAgentId,
|
||||
"tasks:manage_active_checkouts",
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (allowedByGrant) return true;
|
||||
|
||||
const companyAgents = await agentsSvc.list(companyId);
|
||||
const agentsById = new Map(companyAgents.map((agent) => [agent.id, agent]));
|
||||
const actorAgent = agentsById.get(actorAgentId);
|
||||
if (!actorAgent) return false;
|
||||
if (canCreateAgentsLegacy(actorAgent)) return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Reporting-chain managers may intervene in an agent's active checkout
|
||||
// without taking the task over. Peers must own the checkout/run first.
|
||||
let cursor: string | null = assigneeAgentId;
|
||||
for (let depth = 0; cursor && depth < 50; depth += 1) {
|
||||
const assignee = agentsById.get(cursor);
|
||||
if (!assignee) return false;
|
||||
if (assignee.reportsTo === actorAgentId) return true;
|
||||
cursor = assignee.reportsTo;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(
|
||||
req: Request,
|
||||
res: Response,
|
||||
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status: string; assigneeAgentId: string | null },
|
||||
|
|
@ -418,9 +450,23 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
res.status(403).json({ error: "Agent authentication required" });
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (issue.status !== "in_progress" || issue.assigneeAgentId !== actorAgentId) {
|
||||
if (issue.status !== "in_progress" || issue.assigneeAgentId === null) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (issue.assigneeAgentId !== actorAgentId) {
|
||||
if (await hasActiveCheckoutManagementOverride(actorAgentId, issue.companyId, issue.assigneeAgentId)) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
res.status(409).json({
|
||||
error: "Issue is checked out by another agent",
|
||||
details: {
|
||||
issueId: issue.id,
|
||||
assigneeAgentId: issue.assigneeAgentId,
|
||||
actorAgentId,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
const runId = requireAgentRunId(req, res);
|
||||
if (!runId) return false;
|
||||
const ownership = await svc.assertCheckoutOwner(issue.id, actorAgentId, runId);
|
||||
|
|
@ -725,43 +771,6 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
res.json(removed);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
router.get("/issues/:id", async (req, res) => {
|
||||
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(id);
|
||||
if (!issue) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
const [{ project, goal }, ancestors, mentionedProjectIds, documentPayload, relations] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
resolveIssueProjectAndGoal(issue),
|
||||
svc.getAncestors(issue.id),
|
||||
svc.findMentionedProjectIds(issue.id, { includeCommentBodies: false }),
|
||||
documentsSvc.getIssueDocumentPayload(issue),
|
||||
svc.getRelationSummaries(issue.id),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const mentionedProjects = mentionedProjectIds.length > 0
|
||||
? await projectsSvc.listByIds(issue.companyId, mentionedProjectIds)
|
||||
: [];
|
||||
const currentExecutionWorkspace = issue.executionWorkspaceId
|
||||
? await executionWorkspacesSvc.getById(issue.executionWorkspaceId)
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
const workProducts = await workProductsSvc.listForIssue(issue.id);
|
||||
res.json({
|
||||
...issue,
|
||||
goalId: goal?.id ?? issue.goalId,
|
||||
ancestors,
|
||||
blockedBy: relations.blockedBy,
|
||||
blocks: relations.blocks,
|
||||
...documentPayload,
|
||||
project: project ?? null,
|
||||
goal: goal ?? null,
|
||||
mentionedProjects,
|
||||
currentExecutionWorkspace,
|
||||
workProducts,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
router.get("/issues/:id/heartbeat-context", async (req, res) => {
|
||||
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -854,6 +863,43 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
router.get("/issues/:id", async (req, res) => {
|
||||
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(id);
|
||||
if (!issue) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
const [{ project, goal }, ancestors, mentionedProjectIds, documentPayload, relations] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
resolveIssueProjectAndGoal(issue),
|
||||
svc.getAncestors(issue.id),
|
||||
svc.findMentionedProjectIds(issue.id, { includeCommentBodies: false }),
|
||||
documentsSvc.getIssueDocumentPayload(issue),
|
||||
svc.getRelationSummaries(issue.id),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const mentionedProjects = mentionedProjectIds.length > 0
|
||||
? await projectsSvc.listByIds(issue.companyId, mentionedProjectIds)
|
||||
: [];
|
||||
const currentExecutionWorkspace = issue.executionWorkspaceId
|
||||
? await executionWorkspacesSvc.getById(issue.executionWorkspaceId)
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
const workProducts = await workProductsSvc.listForIssue(issue.id);
|
||||
res.json({
|
||||
...issue,
|
||||
goalId: goal?.id ?? issue.goalId,
|
||||
ancestors,
|
||||
blockedBy: relations.blockedBy,
|
||||
blocks: relations.blocks,
|
||||
...documentPayload,
|
||||
project: project ?? null,
|
||||
goal: goal ?? null,
|
||||
mentionedProjects,
|
||||
currentExecutionWorkspace,
|
||||
workProducts,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
router.get("/issues/:id/work-products", async (req, res) => {
|
||||
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -909,6 +955,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const keyParsed = issueDocumentKeySchema.safeParse(String(req.params.key ?? "").trim().toLowerCase());
|
||||
if (!keyParsed.success) {
|
||||
res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid document key", details: keyParsed.error.issues });
|
||||
|
|
@ -980,6 +1027,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const keyParsed = issueDocumentKeySchema.safeParse(String(req.params.key ?? "").trim().toLowerCase());
|
||||
if (!keyParsed.success) {
|
||||
res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid document key", details: keyParsed.error.issues });
|
||||
|
|
@ -1068,6 +1116,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const product = await workProductsSvc.createForIssue(issue.id, issue.companyId, {
|
||||
...req.body,
|
||||
projectId: req.body.projectId ?? issue.projectId ?? null,
|
||||
|
|
@ -1099,6 +1148,12 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(existing.issueId);
|
||||
if (!issue) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const product = await workProductsSvc.update(id, req.body);
|
||||
if (!product) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Work product not found" });
|
||||
|
|
@ -1127,6 +1182,12 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(existing.issueId);
|
||||
if (!issue) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const removed = await workProductsSvc.remove(id);
|
||||
if (!removed) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Work product not found" });
|
||||
|
|
@ -1294,6 +1355,8 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertCanManageIssueApprovalLinks(req, res, issue.companyId))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
const actor = getActorInfo(req);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1326,6 +1389,8 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertCanManageIssueApprovalLinks(req, res, issue.companyId))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
await issueApprovalsSvc.unlink(id, approvalId);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1457,7 +1522,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
||||
assertNoAgentHostWorkspaceCommandMutation(req, collectIssueWorkspaceCommandPaths(req.body));
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentRunCheckoutOwnership(req, res, existing))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, existing))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
const actor = getActorInfo(req);
|
||||
const isClosed = isClosedIssueStatus(existing.status);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2053,6 +2118,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, existing))) return;
|
||||
const attachments = await svc.listAttachments(id);
|
||||
|
||||
const issue = await svc.remove(id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2166,7 +2232,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentRunCheckoutOwnership(req, res, existing))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, existing))) return;
|
||||
const actorRunId = requireAgentRunId(req, res);
|
||||
if (req.actor.type === "agent" && !actorRunId) return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -2255,7 +2321,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentRunCheckoutOwnership(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
const comment = await svc.getComment(commentId);
|
||||
if (!comment || comment.issueId !== id) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -2400,7 +2466,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, issue.companyId);
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentRunCheckoutOwnership(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
const closedExecutionWorkspace = await getClosedIssueExecutionWorkspace(issue);
|
||||
if (closedExecutionWorkspace) {
|
||||
respondClosedIssueExecutionWorkspace(res, closedExecutionWorkspace);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2730,6 +2796,7 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
res.status(422).json({ error: "Issue does not belong to company" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await runSingleFileUpload(req, res);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2840,6 +2907,12 @@ export function issueRoutes(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCompanyAccess(req, attachment.companyId);
|
||||
const issue = await svc.getById(attachment.issueId);
|
||||
if (!issue) {
|
||||
res.status(404).json({ error: "Issue not found" });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!(await assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed(req, res, issue))) return;
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await storage.deleteObject(attachment.companyId, attachment.objectKey);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue