mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-18 19:50:38 +09:00
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
e89076148a
commit
7f893ac4ec
106 changed files with 4682 additions and 713 deletions
|
|
@ -51,12 +51,45 @@ const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|||
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockTrackAgentCreated = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockGetTelemetryClient = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockSyncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
|
||||
const mockAdapter = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
listSkills: vi.fn(),
|
||||
syncSkills: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
||||
trackAgentCreated: mockTrackAgentCreated,
|
||||
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
||||
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
agentInstructionsService: () => mockAgentInstructionsService,
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
approvalService: () => mockApprovalService,
|
||||
companySkillService: () => mockCompanySkillService,
|
||||
budgetService: () => mockBudgetService,
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
||||
issueApprovalService: () => mockIssueApprovalService,
|
||||
issueService: () => ({}),
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
|
||||
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: mockSyncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath,
|
||||
workspaceOperationService: () => mockWorkspaceOperationService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../adapters/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
findServerAdapter: vi.fn(() => mockAdapter),
|
||||
findActiveServerAdapter: vi.fn(() => mockAdapter),
|
||||
listAdapterModels: vi.fn(),
|
||||
detectAdapterModel: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
||||
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
||||
trackAgentCreated: mockTrackAgentCreated,
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,7 +112,7 @@ function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|||
issueService: () => ({}),
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
|
||||
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: vi.fn((_agent, config) => config),
|
||||
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: mockSyncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath,
|
||||
workspaceOperationService: () => mockWorkspaceOperationService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,8 +141,8 @@ function createDb(requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents = false) {
|
|||
|
||||
async function createApp(db: Record<string, unknown> = createDb()) {
|
||||
const [{ agentRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
import("../routes/agents.js"),
|
||||
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/agents.js")>("../routes/agents.js"),
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.use(express.json());
|
||||
|
|
@ -149,8 +182,12 @@ function makeAgent(adapterType: string) {
|
|||
describe("agent skill routes", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/agents.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
registerModuleMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
mockSyncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath.mockImplementation((_agent, config) => config);
|
||||
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: vi.fn() });
|
||||
mockAgentService.resolveByReference.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
ambiguous: false,
|
||||
|
|
@ -336,9 +373,13 @@ describe("agent skill routes", () => {
|
|||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(mockTrackAgentCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), {
|
||||
agentRole: "engineer",
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(mockTrackAgentCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
agentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
||||
agentRole: "engineer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("materializes a managed AGENTS.md for directly created local agents", async () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -417,17 +458,19 @@ describe("agent skill routes", () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
|
||||
expect(mockAgentInstructionsService.materializeManagedBundle).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
||||
role: "engineer",
|
||||
adapterType: "claude_local",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
"AGENTS.md": expect.stringContaining("Keep the work moving until it's done."),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
{ entryFile: "AGENTS.md", replaceExisting: false },
|
||||
);
|
||||
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
||||
expect(mockAgentInstructionsService.materializeManagedBundle).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
||||
role: "engineer",
|
||||
adapterType: "claude_local",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
"AGENTS.md": expect.stringContaining("Keep the work moving until it's done."),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
{ entryFile: "AGENTS.md", replaceExisting: false },
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("includes canonical desired skills in hire approvals", async () => {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue