mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-18 03:30:39 +09:00
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
e89076148a
commit
7f893ac4ec
106 changed files with 4682 additions and 713 deletions
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
|
|||
import express from "express";
|
||||
import request from "supertest";
|
||||
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { issueRoutes } from "../routes/issues.js";
|
||||
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
||||
import { normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy } from "../services/issue-execution-policy.ts";
|
||||
|
||||
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,7 +58,11 @@ vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|||
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
function createApp() {
|
||||
async function createApp() {
|
||||
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.use(express.json());
|
||||
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -95,7 +97,11 @@ function makeIssue() {
|
|||
|
||||
describe("issue activity event routes", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
||||
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
||||
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
||||
|
|
@ -141,35 +147,37 @@ describe("issue activity event routes", () => {
|
|||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp())
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
||||
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
|
||||
.send({ blockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"] });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.blockers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
addedBlockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"],
|
||||
removedBlockedByIssueIds: ["aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"],
|
||||
addedBlockedByIssues: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
|
||||
identifier: "PAP-11",
|
||||
title: "New blocker",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
removedBlockedByIssues: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
identifier: "PAP-10",
|
||||
title: "Old blocker",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.blockers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
addedBlockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"],
|
||||
removedBlockedByIssueIds: ["aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"],
|
||||
addedBlockedByIssues: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
|
||||
identifier: "PAP-11",
|
||||
title: "New blocker",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
removedBlockedByIssues: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
identifier: "PAP-10",
|
||||
title: "Old blocker",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}, 15_000);
|
||||
|
||||
it("logs explicit reviewer and approver activity when execution policy participants change", async () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,32 +221,34 @@ describe("issue activity event routes", () => {
|
|||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp())
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
||||
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
|
||||
.send({ executionPolicy: nextPolicy });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.reviewers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
||||
addedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
||||
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555", userId: null }],
|
||||
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.reviewers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
||||
addedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
||||
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555", userId: null }],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.approvers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
participants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
||||
addedParticipants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
||||
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa", userId: null }],
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.approvers_updated",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
participants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
||||
addedParticipants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
||||
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa", userId: null }],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue