mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-17 11:20:37 +09:00
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
e89076148a
commit
7f893ac4ec
106 changed files with 4682 additions and 713 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
|||
import express from "express";
|
||||
import request from "supertest";
|
||||
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { issueRoutes } from "../routes/issues.js";
|
||||
|
||||
const mockWakeup = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
||||
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,7 +58,11 @@ vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|||
}),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
function createApp() {
|
||||
async function createApp() {
|
||||
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.use(express.json());
|
||||
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -73,15 +76,17 @@ function createApp() {
|
|||
next();
|
||||
});
|
||||
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
||||
app.use((err: any, _req: express.Request, res: express.Response, _next: express.NextFunction) => {
|
||||
res.status(err?.status ?? 500).json({ error: err?.message ?? "Internal server error" });
|
||||
});
|
||||
app.use(errorHandler);
|
||||
return app;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getAncestors.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
||||
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
||||
mockIssueService.getCommentCursor.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,20 +142,20 @@ describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
|||
},
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp()).patch("/api/issues/issue-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
||||
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/issue-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
"agent-2",
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
|
||||
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
issueId: "issue-2",
|
||||
resolvedBlockerIssueId: "issue-1",
|
||||
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
||||
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
"agent-2",
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
|
||||
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
issueId: "issue-2",
|
||||
resolvedBlockerIssueId: "issue-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("wakes the parent when all direct children become terminal", async () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -194,19 +199,19 @@ describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
|||
childIssueIds: ["child-0", "child-1"],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp()).patch("/api/issues/child-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
||||
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/child-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
"agent-9",
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_children_completed",
|
||||
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
issueId: "parent-1",
|
||||
completedChildIssueId: "child-1",
|
||||
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
||||
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
"agent-9",
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_children_completed",
|
||||
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
issueId: "parent-1",
|
||||
completedChildIssueId: "child-1",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue