[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle
semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep
regressions visible
> - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime
correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area
> - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused
issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch
overlapping issue APIs
> - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat,
telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch
> - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness
work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit
comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting

## What Changed

- Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review
stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded
execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and
blocked-to-todo wake resumption
- Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads,
compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and
capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces
- Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on
task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material
- Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster
route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation
from local state, and repo verification follow-ups
- Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small
follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were
dropped during branch reconstruction

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts`
- `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted
on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported
init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they
are noted as environment-limited

## Risks

- Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and
reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow
rather than isolated UI polish
- Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should
pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure
modes and not just reshaping harness behavior

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

server/src/__tests__/issue-feedback-routes.test.ts

@@ -50,31 +50,33 @@ const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
 }));
 const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
 
-vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
-  trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
-  trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
-}));
+function registerModuleMocks() {
+  vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
+    trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
+    trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
+  }));
 
-vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
-  getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
-}));
+  vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
+    getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
+  }));
 
-vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
-  accessService: () => mockAccessService,
-  agentService: () => mockAgentService,
-  documentService: () => ({}),
-  executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
-  feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
-  goalService: () => ({}),
-  heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
-  instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
-  issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
-  issueService: () => mockIssueService,
-  logActivity: mockLogActivity,
-  projectService: () => ({}),
-  routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
-  workProductService: () => ({}),
-}));
+  vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
+    accessService: () => mockAccessService,
+    agentService: () => mockAgentService,
+    documentService: () => ({}),
+    executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
+    feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
+    goalService: () => ({}),
+    heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
+    instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
+    issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
+    issueService: () => mockIssueService,
+    logActivity: mockLogActivity,
+    projectService: () => ({}),
+    routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
+    workProductService: () => ({}),
+  }));
+}
 
 async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
   const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
@@ -95,7 +97,13 @@ async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
 describe("issue feedback trace routes", () => {
   beforeEach(() => {
     vi.resetModules();
-    vi.resetAllMocks();
+    vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
+    vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
+    vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
+    vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
+    vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
+    registerModuleMocks();
+    vi.clearAllMocks();
     mockFeedbackExportService.flushPendingFeedbackTraces.mockResolvedValue({
       attempted: 1,
       sent: 1,