mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-18 19:50:38 +09:00
[codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep regressions visible > - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area > - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch overlapping issue APIs > - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat, telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch > - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting ## What Changed - Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and blocked-to-todo wake resumption - Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads, compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces - Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material - Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation from local state, and repo verification follow-ups - Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were dropped during branch reconstruction ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they are noted as environment-limited ## Risks - Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow rather than isolated UI polish - Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure modes and not just reshaping harness behavior ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
e89076148a
commit
7f893ac4ec
106 changed files with 4682 additions and 713 deletions
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
|
|||
import express from "express";
|
||||
import request from "supertest";
|
||||
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { projectRoutes } from "../routes/projects.js";
|
||||
import { goalRoutes } from "../routes/goals.js";
|
||||
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
||||
|
||||
const mockProjectService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
list: vi.fn(),
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,20 +23,8 @@ const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|||
normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockTrackProjectCreated = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockTrackGoalCreated = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockGetTelemetryClient = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", async () => {
|
||||
const actual = await vi.importActual<typeof import("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry")>(
|
||||
"@paperclipai/shared/telemetry",
|
||||
);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
...actual,
|
||||
trackProjectCreated: mockTrackProjectCreated,
|
||||
trackGoalCreated: mockTrackGoalCreated,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
const mockTelemetryTrack = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
||||
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
|
||||
|
|
@ -58,7 +43,29 @@ vi.mock("../services/workspace-runtime.js", () => ({
|
|||
stopRuntimeServicesForProjectWorkspace: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
function createApp(route: ReturnType<typeof projectRoutes> | ReturnType<typeof goalRoutes>) {
|
||||
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
||||
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
||||
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
goalService: () => mockGoalService,
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
projectService: () => mockProjectService,
|
||||
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
|
||||
workspaceOperationService: () => mockWorkspaceOperationService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/workspace-runtime.js", () => ({
|
||||
startRuntimeServicesForWorkspaceControl: vi.fn(),
|
||||
stopRuntimeServicesForProjectWorkspace: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function createApp(routeType: "project" | "goal") {
|
||||
const { errorHandler } = await vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>(
|
||||
"../middleware/index.js",
|
||||
);
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.use(express.json());
|
||||
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,15 +78,34 @@ function createApp(route: ReturnType<typeof projectRoutes> | ReturnType<typeof g
|
|||
};
|
||||
next();
|
||||
});
|
||||
app.use("/api", route);
|
||||
if (routeType === "project") {
|
||||
const { projectRoutes } = await vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/projects.js")>(
|
||||
"../routes/projects.js",
|
||||
);
|
||||
app.use("/api", projectRoutes({} as any));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const { goalRoutes } = await vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/goals.js")>(
|
||||
"../routes/goals.js",
|
||||
);
|
||||
app.use("/api", goalRoutes({} as any));
|
||||
}
|
||||
app.use(errorHandler);
|
||||
return app;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
describe("project and goal telemetry routes", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: vi.fn() });
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/workspace-runtime.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/projects.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/goals.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
registerModuleMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: mockTelemetryTrack });
|
||||
mockProjectService.resolveByReference.mockResolvedValue({ ambiguous: false, project: null });
|
||||
mockSecretService.normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence.mockImplementation(async (_companyId, env) => env);
|
||||
mockProjectService.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,20 +127,22 @@ describe("project and goal telemetry routes", () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("emits telemetry when a project is created", async () => {
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp(projectRoutes({} as any)))
|
||||
const app = await createApp("project");
|
||||
const res = await request(app)
|
||||
.post("/api/companies/company-1/projects")
|
||||
.send({ name: "Telemetry project" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect([200, 201]).toContain(res.status);
|
||||
expect(mockTrackProjectCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything());
|
||||
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
|
||||
expect(mockTelemetryTrack).toHaveBeenCalledWith("project.created");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("emits telemetry when a goal is created", async () => {
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp(goalRoutes({} as any)))
|
||||
const app = await createApp("goal");
|
||||
const res = await request(app)
|
||||
.post("/api/companies/company-1/goals")
|
||||
.send({ title: "Telemetry goal", level: "team" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(201);
|
||||
expect(mockTrackGoalCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), { goalLevel: "team" });
|
||||
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
|
||||
expect(mockTelemetryTrack).toHaveBeenCalledWith("goal.created", { goal_level: "team" });
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue