mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-20 04:20:38 +09:00
Add planning mode for issue work (#5353)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - Issues are the core unit of work, and issue comments are how board users and agents coordinate execution. > - Some issue conversations need to produce plans and approvals instead of immediate implementation work. > - The existing issue contract did not distinguish standard execution comments from planning-oriented issue work. > - This pull request adds an issue work-mode contract and board UI affordances for standard vs planning mode. > - The benefit is that planning-mode issues can be created, displayed, discussed, and carried through agent heartbeat context without losing the normal issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added `standard` / `planning` issue work-mode contracts across DB, shared validators/types, server issue flows, plugin protocol, and adapter heartbeat payloads. - Added an idempotent `0081_optimal_dormammu` migration for `issues.work_mode`, ordered after current `public-gh/master` migrations. - Updated heartbeat/context summaries and issue-thread interaction behavior so planning work mode is preserved when creating suggested follow-up issues. - Added UI support for planning-mode issue creation, issue rows, detail composer styling, and composer work-mode toggles. - Added focused server/shared/UI tests plus a Playwright visual verification spec for planning-mode surfaces. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` and added durable planning-mode screenshots under `doc/assets/pap-3368/`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/shared packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `PAPERCLIP_E2E_SKIP_LLM=true npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/planning-mode-visual-verification.spec.ts` ## Screenshots Desktop planning detail:  Desktop planning row:  Desktop staged standard toggle:  Mobile planning detail:  Mobile planning row:  ## Risks - Medium migration risk: this adds a non-null issue column. The migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so installations that applied an older branch-local migration number can still apply the final numbered migration safely. - Medium contract risk: issue payloads, plugin payloads, and adapter heartbeat payloads now include work mode; compatibility is handled by defaulting missing values to `standard`. - UI risk is moderate because composer controls changed; focused component tests and visual e2e coverage exercise standard vs planning display and toggle behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in a local Paperclip worktree, with shell/tool use. Exact context-window size is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
320fd5d23b
commit
a1b30c9f35
65 changed files with 1539 additions and 214 deletions
|
|
@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ import {
|
|||
type Issue,
|
||||
type IssueAttachment,
|
||||
type IssueComment,
|
||||
type IssueWorkMode,
|
||||
type IssueThreadInteraction,
|
||||
type RequestConfirmationInteraction,
|
||||
type SuggestTasksInteraction,
|
||||
|
|
@ -186,7 +187,6 @@ const LEAF_WORK_CONTROL_MODE_HELP_TEXT: Partial<Record<IssueTreeControlMode, str
|
|||
pause: "Pause active execution on this issue until an explicit resume.",
|
||||
resume: "Release the active pause hold so this issue can continue.",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
function issueTreeControlLabel(mode: IssueTreeControlMode, scope: "leaf" | "subtree") {
|
||||
return scope === "leaf"
|
||||
? LEAF_WORK_CONTROL_MODE_LABEL[mode] ?? TREE_CONTROL_MODE_LABEL[mode]
|
||||
|
|
@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ type IssueDetailChatTabProps = {
|
|||
companyId: string;
|
||||
projectId: string | null;
|
||||
issueStatus: Issue["status"];
|
||||
issueWorkMode: IssueWorkMode;
|
||||
executionRunId: string | null;
|
||||
blockedBy: Issue["blockedBy"];
|
||||
blockerAttention: Issue["blockerAttention"] | null;
|
||||
|
|
@ -592,6 +593,7 @@ type IssueDetailChatTabProps = {
|
|||
commentsLoadingOlder: boolean;
|
||||
onLoadOlderComments: () => void;
|
||||
onRefreshLatestComments: () => Promise<unknown> | void;
|
||||
onWorkModeChange?: (workMode: IssueWorkMode) => Promise<void> | void;
|
||||
composerRef: Ref<IssueChatComposerHandle>;
|
||||
feedbackVotes?: FeedbackVote[];
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed" | "not_allowed" | "prompt";
|
||||
|
|
@ -638,6 +640,7 @@ const IssueDetailChatTab = memo(function IssueDetailChatTab({
|
|||
issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
projectId,
|
||||
issueWorkMode,
|
||||
issueStatus,
|
||||
executionRunId,
|
||||
blockedBy,
|
||||
|
|
@ -650,6 +653,7 @@ const IssueDetailChatTab = memo(function IssueDetailChatTab({
|
|||
commentsLoadingOlder,
|
||||
onLoadOlderComments,
|
||||
onRefreshLatestComments,
|
||||
onWorkModeChange,
|
||||
composerRef,
|
||||
feedbackVotes,
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference,
|
||||
|
|
@ -878,6 +882,8 @@ const IssueDetailChatTab = memo(function IssueDetailChatTab({
|
|||
onSubmitInteractionAnswers(interaction, answers)
|
||||
}
|
||||
onCancelInteraction={onCancelInteraction}
|
||||
issueWorkMode={issueWorkMode}
|
||||
onWorkModeChange={onWorkModeChange}
|
||||
onCancelRun={runningIssueRun && onPauseWorkRun
|
||||
? async () => {
|
||||
await onPauseWorkRun(runningIssueRun.id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -3190,6 +3196,15 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
</span>
|
||||
) : null}
|
||||
|
||||
{issue.workMode === "planning" ? (
|
||||
<span
|
||||
className="inline-flex items-center rounded-full border border-amber-500/40 bg-amber-500/10 px-2 py-0.5 text-[10px] font-medium text-amber-700 dark:text-amber-300 shrink-0"
|
||||
title="This issue is in planning mode."
|
||||
>
|
||||
Planning
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
) : null}
|
||||
|
||||
{issue.projectId ? (
|
||||
<Link
|
||||
to={`/projects/${issue.projectId}`}
|
||||
|
|
@ -3706,6 +3721,7 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
companyId={issue.companyId}
|
||||
projectId={issue.projectId ?? null}
|
||||
issueStatus={issue.status}
|
||||
issueWorkMode={issue.workMode ?? "standard"}
|
||||
executionRunId={issue.executionRunId ?? null}
|
||||
blockedBy={issue.blockedBy ?? []}
|
||||
blockerAttention={issue.blockerAttention ?? null}
|
||||
|
|
@ -3741,6 +3757,11 @@ export function IssueDetail() {
|
|||
onPauseWorkRun={canManageTreeControl
|
||||
? (runId) => pauseIssueWorkRun.mutateAsync({ runId, scope: treeControlScope }).then(() => undefined)
|
||||
: undefined}
|
||||
onWorkModeChange={(nextMode) => {
|
||||
const currentMode: IssueWorkMode = issue.workMode ?? "standard";
|
||||
if (currentMode === nextMode) return;
|
||||
return updateIssue.mutateAsync({ workMode: nextMode }).then(() => undefined);
|
||||
}}
|
||||
onCancelQueued={handleCancelQueuedComment}
|
||||
interruptingQueuedRunId={interruptQueuedComment.isPending ? interruptQueuedComment.variables ?? null : null}
|
||||
pausingWorkRunId={pauseIssueWorkRun.isPending ? pauseIssueWorkRun.variables?.runId ?? null : null}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue