[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.

## What Changed

- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.

## Verification

- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 014aa0eb2d
commit a957394420
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
93 changed files with 10089 additions and 752 deletions

View file

@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { accessRoutes } from "../routes/access.js";
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
const logActivityMock = vi.fn();
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => ({
isInstanceAdmin: vi.fn(),
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}),
boardAuthService: () => ({
createChallenge: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardAccess: vi.fn(),
assertCurrentBoardKey: vi.fn(),
revokeBoardApiKey: vi.fn(),
}),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn(),
logActivity: (...args: unknown[]) => logActivityMock(...args),
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => ({
isInstanceAdmin: vi.fn(),
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}),
boardAuthService: () => ({
createChallenge: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardAccess: vi.fn(),
assertCurrentBoardKey: vi.fn(),
revokeBoardApiKey: vi.fn(),
}),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn(),
logActivity: (...args: unknown[]) => logActivityMock(...args),
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
}));
}
function createDbStub() {
const createdInvite = {
@ -76,7 +76,11 @@ function createDbStub() {
};
}
function createApp() {
async function createApp() {
const [{ accessRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
import("../routes/access.js"),
import("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
@ -103,11 +107,18 @@ function createApp() {
describe("POST /companies/:companyId/invites", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.resetAllMocks();
logActivityMock.mockReset();
});
it("returns an absolute invite URL using the request base URL", async () => {
const app = createApp();
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/invites")