mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-19 04:00:38 +09:00
[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals, and the board UI. > - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals. > - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native surface for proposed tasks and questions. > - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations, richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers. > - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks, structured questions, and request confirmations. - Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows. - Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from agents/plugins. - Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for issue-scoped decisions. - Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users. ## Verification - `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79 tests passed - `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration numbering check ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces. - Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering. - UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR does not include browser screenshots. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local shell/code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
014aa0eb2d
commit
a957394420
93 changed files with 10089 additions and 752 deletions
|
|
@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ import { Readable } from "node:stream";
|
|||
import express from "express";
|
||||
import request from "supertest";
|
||||
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
||||
import { issueRoutes } from "../routes/issues.js";
|
||||
|
||||
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
||||
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,65 +52,96 @@ const mockStorageService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|||
headObject: vi.fn(),
|
||||
deleteObject: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
||||
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
|
||||
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
||||
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
||||
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
function registerRouteMocks() {
|
||||
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
||||
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
|
||||
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
documentService: () => mockDocumentService,
|
||||
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
||||
feedbackService: () => ({
|
||||
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
goalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
||||
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
||||
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
||||
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
||||
general: {
|
||||
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
})),
|
||||
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
||||
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
||||
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
||||
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
||||
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/documents.js", () => ({
|
||||
documentService: () => mockDocumentService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/work-products.js", () => ({
|
||||
workProductService: () => mockWorkProductService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
||||
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
documentService: () => mockDocumentService,
|
||||
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
||||
feedbackService: () => ({
|
||||
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
projectService: () => ({}),
|
||||
routineService: () => ({
|
||||
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
workProductService: () => mockWorkProductService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
goalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
||||
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
||||
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
||||
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
||||
general: {
|
||||
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
})),
|
||||
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
||||
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
||||
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
||||
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
|
||||
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
projectService: () => ({}),
|
||||
routineService: () => ({
|
||||
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
workProductService: () => mockWorkProductService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
|
|
@ -146,7 +175,11 @@ function makeAgent(id: string, overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
||||
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
||||
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
||||
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.use(express.json());
|
||||
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,7 +224,46 @@ function boardActor() {
|
|||
|
||||
describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/documents.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/work-products.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
registerRouteMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
mockAccessService.canUser.mockReset();
|
||||
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockReset();
|
||||
mockAgentService.getById.mockReset();
|
||||
mockAgentService.list.mockReset();
|
||||
mockAgentService.resolveByReference.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.addComment.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getAttachmentById.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getById.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.listAttachments.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.remove.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.removeAttachment.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.update.mockReset();
|
||||
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockReset();
|
||||
mockDocumentService.upsertIssueDocument.mockReset();
|
||||
mockWorkProductService.getById.mockReset();
|
||||
mockWorkProductService.update.mockReset();
|
||||
mockStorageService.putFile.mockReset();
|
||||
mockStorageService.getObject.mockReset();
|
||||
mockStorageService.headObject.mockReset();
|
||||
mockStorageService.deleteObject.mockReset();
|
||||
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
||||
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
||||
mockAgentService.getById.mockImplementation(async (id: string) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -295,7 +367,7 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
],
|
||||
["attachment delete", (app: express.Express) => request(app).delete("/api/attachments/attachment-1")],
|
||||
])("rejects peer agent %s on another agent's active checkout", async (_name, sendRequest) => {
|
||||
const res = await sendRequest(createApp(peerActor()));
|
||||
const res = await sendRequest(await createApp(peerActor()));
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(409);
|
||||
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Issue is checked out by another agent");
|
||||
|
|
@ -309,7 +381,7 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("allows the checked-out owner with the matching run id to patch and update documents", async () => {
|
||||
const app = createApp(ownerActor());
|
||||
const app = await createApp(ownerActor());
|
||||
|
||||
await request(app).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Updated" }).expect(200);
|
||||
await request(app)
|
||||
|
|
@ -330,7 +402,7 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("preserves board mutations on active checkouts", async () => {
|
||||
const app = createApp(boardActor());
|
||||
const app = await createApp(boardActor());
|
||||
|
||||
await request(app).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Board update" }).expect(200);
|
||||
await request(app)
|
||||
|
|
@ -351,7 +423,7 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
permissionKey: string,
|
||||
) => principalId === peerAgentId && permissionKey === "tasks:manage_active_checkouts");
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Managed update" });
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Managed update" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -365,7 +437,7 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
...patch,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Todo update" });
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Todo update" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -379,10 +451,14 @@ describe("agent issue mutation checkout ownership", () => {
|
|||
...patch,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Claimable update" });
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp(peerActor())).patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`).send({ title: "Claimable update" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
||||
title: "Claimable update",
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue