mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-18 11:40:39 +09:00
[codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals, and the board UI. > - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals. > - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native surface for proposed tasks and questions. > - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations, richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers. > - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks, structured questions, and request confirmations. - Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows. - Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from agents/plugins. - Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for issue-scoped decisions. - Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users. ## Verification - `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79 tests passed - `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration numbering check ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces. - Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering. - UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR does not include browser screenshots. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local shell/code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
GitHub
parent
014aa0eb2d
commit
a957394420
93 changed files with 10089 additions and 752 deletions
|
|
@ -25,46 +25,88 @@ const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
||||
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
||||
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
||||
goalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
||||
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
||||
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
||||
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
||||
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
||||
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
||||
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
||||
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
||||
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
projectService: () => ({}),
|
||||
routineService: () => ({
|
||||
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
||||
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
||||
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
||||
general: {
|
||||
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
})),
|
||||
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
||||
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
|
||||
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const planDocument = {
|
||||
id: "document-1",
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
issueId,
|
||||
key: "plan",
|
||||
title: "Plan",
|
||||
format: "markdown",
|
||||
body: "# Plan",
|
||||
latestRevisionId: "revision-2",
|
||||
latestRevisionNumber: 2,
|
||||
createdByAgentId: null,
|
||||
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
||||
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
||||
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const systemDocument = {
|
||||
...planDocument,
|
||||
id: "document-2",
|
||||
key: "system-plan",
|
||||
title: "System plan",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/documents.js", () => ({
|
||||
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
||||
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
||||
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
||||
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
||||
|
|
@ -72,14 +114,8 @@ function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|||
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
||||
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
||||
goalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
||||
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
||||
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
||||
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
||||
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
||||
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
||||
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
||||
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
||||
|
|
@ -95,11 +131,10 @@ function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|||
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
||||
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
|
||||
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
||||
projectService: () => ({}),
|
||||
routineService: () => ({
|
||||
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
||||
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -129,8 +164,17 @@ async function createApp() {
|
|||
describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.resetModules();
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/documents.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
||||
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
||||
registerModuleMocks();
|
||||
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
||||
|
|
@ -141,25 +185,10 @@ describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
|||
title: "Document revisions",
|
||||
status: "in_progress",
|
||||
});
|
||||
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments.mockResolvedValue([
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "document-1",
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
issueId,
|
||||
key: "plan",
|
||||
title: "Plan",
|
||||
format: "markdown",
|
||||
body: "# Plan",
|
||||
latestRevisionId: "revision-2",
|
||||
latestRevisionNumber: 2,
|
||||
createdByAgentId: null,
|
||||
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
||||
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
||||
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
||||
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
]);
|
||||
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments.mockImplementation(
|
||||
async (_issueId, options: { includeSystem?: boolean } | undefined) =>
|
||||
options?.includeSystem ? [planDocument, systemDocument] : [planDocument],
|
||||
);
|
||||
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocumentRevisions.mockResolvedValue([
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "revision-2",
|
||||
|
|
@ -198,6 +227,19 @@ describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
|||
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
||||
general: {
|
||||
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
||||
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({});
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" });
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue([companyId]);
|
||||
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -219,14 +261,19 @@ describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
|||
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents`);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments).toHaveBeenCalledWith(issueId, { includeSystem: false });
|
||||
expect(res.body).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" })]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("passes includeSystem=true through for debug document listing", async () => {
|
||||
await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents?includeSystem=true`);
|
||||
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(
|
||||
`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents?includeSystem=true`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments).toHaveBeenCalledWith(issueId, { includeSystem: true });
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(res.body).toEqual([
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" }),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ key: "system-plan" }),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("restores a revision through the append-only route and logs the action", async () => {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue