fix(authz): scope import, approvals, activity, and heartbeat routes (#3315)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents and company-scoped control-plane
actions for zero-human companies.
> - This change touches the server authz boundary around company
portability, approvals, activity, and heartbeat-run operations.
> - The vulnerability was that board-authenticated callers could cross
company boundaries or create new companies through import paths without
the same authorization checks enforced elsewhere.
> - Once that gap existed, an attacker could chain it into higher-impact
behavior through agent execution paths.
> - The fix needed to harden every confirmed authorization gap in the
reported chain, not just the first route that exposed it.
> - This pull request adds the missing instance-admin and company-access
checks and adds regression tests for each affected route.
> - The benefit is that cross-company actions and new-company import
flows now follow the same control-plane authorization rules as the rest
of the product.

## What Changed

- Required instance-admin access for `new_company` import preview/apply
flows in `server/src/routes/companies.ts`.
- Required company access before approval decision routes in
`server/src/routes/approvals.ts`.
- Required company access for activity creation and heartbeat-run issue
listing in `server/src/routes/activity.ts`.
- Required company access before heartbeat cancellation in
`server/src/routes/agents.ts`.
- Added regression coverage in the corresponding server route tests.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/company-portability-routes.test.ts
src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts
src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- Prior verification on the original security patch branch also included
`pnpm build`.

## Risks

- Low code risk: the change is narrow and only adds missing
authorization gates to existing routes.
- Operational risk: the advisory is already public, so this PR should be
merged quickly to minimize the public unpatched window.
- Residual product risk remains around open signup / bootstrap defaults,
which was intentionally left out of this patch because the current
first-user onboarding flow depends on it.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent with tool use and local code execution
in the Codex CLI environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Forgotten <forgottenrunes@protonmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-04-10 11:55:27 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 4477ca2a7e
commit ac664df8e4
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
8 changed files with 203 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { validate } from "../middleware/validate.js";
import { activityService } from "../services/activity.js";
import { assertBoard, assertCompanyAccess } from "./authz.js";
import { issueService } from "../services/index.js";
import { heartbeatService, issueService } from "../services/index.js";
import { sanitizeRecord } from "../redaction.js";
const createActivitySchema = z.object({
@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ const createActivitySchema = z.object({
export function activityRoutes(db: Db) {
const router = Router();
const svc = activityService(db);
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
const issueSvc = issueService(db);
async function resolveIssueByRef(rawId: string) {
@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ export function activityRoutes(db: Db) {
router.post("/companies/:companyId/activity", validate(createActivitySchema), async (req, res) => {
assertBoard(req);
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string;
assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);
const event = await svc.create({
companyId,
...req.body,
@ -80,6 +82,12 @@ export function activityRoutes(db: Db) {
router.get("/heartbeat-runs/:runId/issues", async (req, res) => {
const runId = req.params.runId as string;
const run = await heartbeat.getRun(runId);
if (!run) {
res.json([]);
return;
}
assertCompanyAccess(req, run.companyId);
const result = await svc.issuesForRun(runId);
res.json(result);
});