feat: implement multi-user access and invite flows (#3784)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies.
> - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared,
authenticated deployments.
> - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite
flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls.
> - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace,
approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated
boundaries.
> - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA
fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements,
release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening.
> - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master`
branch as a single reviewable PR.
> - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests
and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work.

## What Changed

- Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes,
company user directory, profile settings, company access/member
management, join requests, and invite management.
- Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding,
invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E
coverage.
- Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across
board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes.
- Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on
name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup
for pending human requests.
- Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company
Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions.
- Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering,
sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution
workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation.
- Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership,
issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and
multi-user flows.
- Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all
conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this
PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server
typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm db:generate`
- `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list`
- Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind
`public-gh/master` before PR creation.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR
diff.

## Risks

- High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user
branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on
company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment
behavior.
- UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access
settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in
this branch-consolidation PR.
- Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require
instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations
for non-admin board users.
- A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human
requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual
historical duplicates should review the migration behavior.
- Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined
endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility.
- Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should
cover the full matrix.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use
environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not
exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an
already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were
captured during this heartbeat.

---------

Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-04-17 09:44:19 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent e93e418cbf
commit b9a80dcf22
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
150 changed files with 26872 additions and 1289 deletions

View file

@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import {
agents,
authUsers,
companies,
createDb,
projects,
@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ import {
const ORIGINAL_CWD = process.cwd();
const ORIGINAL_ENV = { ...process.env };
const embeddedPostgresSupport = await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
const itEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? it : it.skip;
const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
if (!embeddedPostgresSupport.supported) {
@ -373,6 +375,97 @@ describe("worktree helpers", () => {
}
});
itEmbeddedPostgres(
"seeds authenticated users into minimally cloned worktree instances",
async () => {
const tempRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "paperclip-worktree-auth-seed-"));
const worktreeRoot = path.join(tempRoot, "PAP-999-auth-seed");
const sourceHome = path.join(tempRoot, "source-home");
const sourceConfigDir = path.join(sourceHome, "instances", "source");
const sourceConfigPath = path.join(sourceConfigDir, "config.json");
const sourceEnvPath = path.join(sourceConfigDir, ".env");
const sourceKeyPath = path.join(sourceConfigDir, "secrets", "master.key");
const worktreeHome = path.join(tempRoot, ".paperclip-worktrees");
const originalCwd = process.cwd();
const sourceDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-worktree-auth-source-");
try {
const sourceDbClient = createDb(sourceDb.connectionString);
await sourceDbClient.insert(authUsers).values({
id: "user-existing",
email: "existing@paperclip.ing",
name: "Existing User",
emailVerified: true,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
});
fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(sourceKeyPath), { recursive: true });
fs.mkdirSync(worktreeRoot, { recursive: true });
const sourceConfig = buildSourceConfig();
sourceConfig.database = {
mode: "postgres",
embeddedPostgresDataDir: path.join(sourceConfigDir, "db"),
embeddedPostgresPort: 54329,
backup: {
enabled: true,
intervalMinutes: 60,
retentionDays: 30,
dir: path.join(sourceConfigDir, "backups"),
},
connectionString: sourceDb.connectionString,
};
sourceConfig.logging.logDir = path.join(sourceConfigDir, "logs");
sourceConfig.storage.localDisk.baseDir = path.join(sourceConfigDir, "storage");
sourceConfig.secrets.localEncrypted.keyFilePath = sourceKeyPath;
fs.writeFileSync(sourceConfigPath, JSON.stringify(sourceConfig, null, 2) + "\n", "utf8");
fs.writeFileSync(sourceEnvPath, "", "utf8");
fs.writeFileSync(sourceKeyPath, "source-master-key", "utf8");
process.chdir(worktreeRoot);
await worktreeInitCommand({
name: "PAP-999-auth-seed",
home: worktreeHome,
fromConfig: sourceConfigPath,
force: true,
});
const targetConfig = JSON.parse(
fs.readFileSync(path.join(worktreeRoot, ".paperclip", "config.json"), "utf8"),
) as PaperclipConfig;
const { default: EmbeddedPostgres } = await import("embedded-postgres");
const targetPg = new EmbeddedPostgres({
databaseDir: targetConfig.database.embeddedPostgresDataDir,
user: "paperclip",
password: "paperclip",
port: targetConfig.database.embeddedPostgresPort,
persistent: true,
initdbFlags: ["--encoding=UTF8", "--locale=C", "--lc-messages=C"],
onLog: () => {},
onError: () => {},
});
await targetPg.start();
try {
const targetDb = createDb(
`postgres://paperclip:paperclip@127.0.0.1:${targetConfig.database.embeddedPostgresPort}/paperclip`,
);
const seededUsers = await targetDb.select().from(authUsers);
expect(seededUsers.some((row) => row.email === "existing@paperclip.ing")).toBe(true);
} finally {
await targetPg.stop();
}
} finally {
process.chdir(originalCwd);
await sourceDb.cleanup();
fs.rmSync(tempRoot, { recursive: true, force: true });
}
},
20000,
);
it("avoids ports already claimed by sibling worktree instance configs", async () => {
const tempRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "paperclip-worktree-claimed-ports-"));
const repoRoot = path.join(tempRoot, "repo");