feat: implement multi-user access and invite flows (#3784)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies.
> - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared,
authenticated deployments.
> - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite
flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls.
> - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace,
approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated
boundaries.
> - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA
fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements,
release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening.
> - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master`
branch as a single reviewable PR.
> - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests
and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work.

## What Changed

- Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes,
company user directory, profile settings, company access/member
management, join requests, and invite management.
- Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding,
invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E
coverage.
- Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across
board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes.
- Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on
name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup
for pending human requests.
- Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company
Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions.
- Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering,
sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution
workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation.
- Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership,
issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and
multi-user flows.
- Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all
conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this
PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server
typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm db:generate`
- `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list`
- Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind
`public-gh/master` before PR creation.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR
diff.

## Risks

- High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user
branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on
company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment
behavior.
- UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access
settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in
this branch-consolidation PR.
- Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require
instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations
for non-admin board users.
- A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human
requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual
historical duplicates should review the migration behavior.
- Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined
endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility.
- Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should
cover the full matrix.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use
environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not
exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an
already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were
captured during this heartbeat.

---------

Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
+import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
+import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+import {
+  companies,
+  companyMemberships,
+  createDb,
+  principalPermissionGrants,
+} from "@paperclipai/db";
+import {
+  getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport,
+  startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase,
+} from "./helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
+import { accessService } from "../services/access.js";
+
+const embeddedPostgresSupport = await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
+const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
+
+async function createCompanyWithOwner(db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>) {
+  const company = await db
+    .insert(companies)
+    .values({
+      name: `Access Service ${randomUUID()}`,
+      issuePrefix: `AS${randomUUID().slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
+    })
+    .returning()
+    .then((rows) => rows[0]!);
+
+  const owner = await db
+    .insert(companyMemberships)
+    .values({
+      companyId: company.id,
+      principalType: "user",
+      principalId: `owner-${randomUUID()}`,
+      status: "active",
+      membershipRole: "owner",
+    })
+    .returning()
+    .then((rows) => rows[0]!);
+
+  return { company, owner };
+}
+
+describeEmbeddedPostgres("access service", () => {
+  let db!: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
+  let tempDb: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | null = null;
+
+  beforeAll(async () => {
+    tempDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-access-service-");
+    db = createDb(tempDb.connectionString);
+  }, 20_000);
+
+  afterEach(async () => {
+    await db.delete(principalPermissionGrants);
+    await db.delete(companyMemberships);
+    await db.delete(companies);
+  });
+
+  afterAll(async () => {
+    await tempDb?.cleanup();
+  });
+
+  it("rejects combined access updates that would demote the last active owner", async () => {
+    const { company, owner } = await createCompanyWithOwner(db);
+    const access = accessService(db);
+
+    await expect(
+      access.updateMemberAndPermissions(
+        company.id,
+        owner.id,
+        { membershipRole: "admin", grants: [] },
+        "admin-user",
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow("Cannot remove the last active owner");
+
+    const unchanged = await db
+      .select()
+      .from(companyMemberships)
+      .where(eq(companyMemberships.id, owner.id))
+      .then((rows) => rows[0]!);
+    expect(unchanged.membershipRole).toBe("owner");
+  });
+
+  it("rejects role-only updates that would suspend the last active owner", async () => {
+    const { company, owner } = await createCompanyWithOwner(db);
+    const access = accessService(db);
+
+    await expect(
+      access.updateMember(company.id, owner.id, { status: "suspended" }),
+    ).rejects.toThrow("Cannot remove the last active owner");
+
+    const unchanged = await db
+      .select()
+      .from(companyMemberships)
+      .where(eq(companyMemberships.id, owner.id))
+      .then((rows) => rows[0]!);
+    expect(unchanged.status).toBe("active");
+  });
+});