feat: implement multi-user access and invite flows (#3784)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies.
> - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared,
authenticated deployments.
> - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite
flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls.
> - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace,
approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated
boundaries.
> - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA
fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements,
release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening.
> - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master`
branch as a single reviewable PR.
> - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests
and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work.

## What Changed

- Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes,
company user directory, profile settings, company access/member
management, join requests, and invite management.
- Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding,
invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E
coverage.
- Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across
board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes.
- Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on
name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup
for pending human requests.
- Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company
Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions.
- Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering,
sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution
workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation.
- Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership,
issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and
multi-user flows.
- Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all
conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this
PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server
typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm db:generate`
- `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list`
- Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind
`public-gh/master` before PR creation.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR
diff.

## Risks

- High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user
branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on
company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment
behavior.
- UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access
settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in
this branch-consolidation PR.
- Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require
instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations
for non-admin board users.
- A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human
requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual
historical duplicates should review the migration behavior.
- Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined
endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility.
- Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should
cover the full matrix.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use
environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not
exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an
already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were
captured during this heartbeat.

---------

Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

ui/src/lib/activity-format.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 import type { Agent } from "@paperclipai/shared";
+import type { CompanyUserProfile } from "./company-members";
 
 type ActivityDetails = Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined;
 
@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ type ActivityIssueReference = {
 
 interface ActivityFormatOptions {
   agentMap?: Map<string, Agent>;
+  userProfileMap?: Map<string, CompanyUserProfile>;
   currentUserId?: string | null;
 }
 
@@ -118,9 +120,11 @@ function readIssueReferences(details: ActivityDetails, key: string): ActivityIss
   return value.filter(isActivityIssueReference);
 }
 
-function formatUserLabel(userId: string | null | undefined, currentUserId?: string | null): string {
+function formatUserLabel(userId: string | null | undefined, options: ActivityFormatOptions = {}): string {
   if (!userId || userId === "local-board") return "Board";
-  if (currentUserId && userId === currentUserId) return "You";
+  if (options.currentUserId && userId === options.currentUserId) return "You";
+  const profile = options.userProfileMap?.get(userId);
+  if (profile) return profile.label;
   return `user ${userId.slice(0, 5)}`;
 }
 
@@ -129,7 +133,7 @@ function formatParticipantLabel(participant: ActivityParticipant, options: Activ
     const agentId = participant.agentId ?? "";
     return options.agentMap?.get(agentId)?.name ?? "agent";
   }
-  return formatUserLabel(participant.userId, options.currentUserId);
+  return formatUserLabel(participant.userId, options);
 }
 
 function formatIssueReferenceLabel(reference: ActivityIssueReference): string {
@@ -167,7 +171,20 @@ function formatIssueUpdatedVerb(details: ActivityDetails): string | null {
   return null;
 }
 
-function formatIssueUpdatedAction(details: ActivityDetails): string | null {
+function formatAssigneeName(details: ActivityDetails, options: ActivityFormatOptions): string | null {
+  if (!details) return null;
+  const agentId = details.assigneeAgentId;
+  const userId = details.assigneeUserId;
+  if (typeof agentId === "string" && agentId) {
+    return options.agentMap?.get(agentId)?.name ?? "agent";
+  }
+  if (typeof userId === "string" && userId) {
+    return formatUserLabel(userId, options);
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+
+function formatIssueUpdatedAction(details: ActivityDetails, options: ActivityFormatOptions = {}): string | null {
   if (!details) return null;
   const previous = asRecord(details._previous) ?? {};
   const parts: string[] = [];
@@ -189,7 +206,8 @@ function formatIssueUpdatedAction(details: ActivityDetails): string | null {
     );
   }
   if (details.assigneeAgentId !== undefined || details.assigneeUserId !== undefined) {
-    parts.push(details.assigneeAgentId || details.assigneeUserId ? "assigned the issue" : "unassigned the issue");
+    const assigneeName = formatAssigneeName(details, options);
+    parts.push(assigneeName ? `assigned the issue to ${assigneeName}` : "unassigned the issue");
   }
   if (details.title !== undefined) parts.push("updated the title");
   if (details.description !== undefined) parts.push("updated the description");
@@ -266,7 +284,7 @@ export function formatIssueActivityAction(
   options: ActivityFormatOptions = {},
 ): string {
   if (action === "issue.updated") {
-    const issueUpdatedAction = formatIssueUpdatedAction(details);
+    const issueUpdatedAction = formatIssueUpdatedAction(details, options);
     if (issueUpdatedAction) return issueUpdatedAction;
   }