Add workflow interaction cancellation and issue cost summaries (#4862)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates work through issue-thread interactions, run
history, and cost telemetry.
> - Operators need workflow prompts to be cancellable and costs to be
visible at the issue level.
> - The earlier rollup mixed this workflow/cost work with database
backups, reliability recovery, thread scaling, and settings polish.
> - This pull request isolates the interaction and cost surfaces into a
reviewable slice.
> - The backend now supports cancelling pending question interactions
and summarizing issue-tree costs.
> - The UI component layer can render cancelled questions and interleave
activity with run ledger rows.

## What Changed

- Added `cancelled` as an issue-thread interaction status and result
shape for question interactions.
- Added the board-only `POST
/issues/:id/interactions/:interactionId/cancel` route and service
implementation.
- Added issue-tree cost summary support in the cost service and
`/issues/:id/cost-summary` API route.
- Extended shared cost exports and UI API/query keys for issue cost
summaries.
- Updated `IssueThreadInteractionCard` and `IssueRunLedger` components
for cancelled questions, issue cost surfaces, and activity/run
interleaving.
- Added focused server and component regression coverage.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRunLedger.test.tsx`
- Result: 4 test files passed, 45 tests passed.
- UI screenshots not included because this PR updates reusable
components and API surfaces without wiring a new page-level layout.

## Risks

- Adds a new interaction terminal status; clients that switch
exhaustively on interaction status may need to handle `cancelled`.
- Issue-tree cost summaries use recursive issue traversal and should be
watched on unusually large issue trees.
- Page-level issue detail wiring is intentionally left to the board
QoL/issue-detail branch to keep this PR narrow.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.5, code execution and GitHub CLI tool use, medium
reasoning effort.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-04-30 13:57:25 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 87f19cd9a6
commit c4269bab59
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
23 changed files with 810 additions and 53 deletions

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll } from "vitest";
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { createDb, companies, agents, costEvents, financeEvents, projects } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { createDb, companies, agents, costEvents, financeEvents, issues, projects } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { costService } from "../services/costs.ts";
import { financeService } from "../services/finance.ts";
import {
@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
cancelBudgetScopeWork: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
}));
@ -57,6 +61,15 @@ const mockCostService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
byAgentModel: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
byProvider: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
byBiller: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
issueTreeSummary: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "issue-1",
issueCount: 1,
includeDescendants: true,
costCents: 0,
inputTokens: 0,
cachedInputTokens: 0,
outputTokens: 0,
}),
windowSpend: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
byProject: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
}));
@ -87,6 +100,7 @@ function registerModuleMocks() {
financeService: () => mockFinanceService,
companyService: () => mockCompanyService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
@ -161,6 +175,16 @@ beforeEach(() => {
budgetMonthlyCents: 100,
spentMonthlyCents: 0,
});
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "issue-1",
companyId: "company-1",
identifier: "PAP-1",
});
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue({
id: "issue-1",
companyId: "company-1",
identifier: "PAP-1",
});
mockBudgetService.upsertPolicy.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
@ -201,6 +225,24 @@ describe("cost routes", () => {
});
});
it("returns issue subtree cost summaries for issue refs", async () => {
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app).get("/api/issues/PAP-1/cost-summary");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.getByIdentifier).toHaveBeenCalledWith("PAP-1");
expect(mockCostService.issueTreeSummary).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", "issue-1");
expect(res.body).toEqual({
issueId: "issue-1",
issueCount: 1,
includeDescendants: true,
costCents: 0,
inputTokens: 0,
cachedInputTokens: 0,
outputTokens: 0,
});
});
it("returns 400 for invalid finance event list limits", async () => {
const { parseCostLimit } = await loadCostParsers();
expect(() => parseCostLimit({ limit: "0" })).toThrow(/invalid 'limit'/i);
@ -351,6 +393,7 @@ describeEmbeddedPostgres("cost and finance aggregate overflow handling", () => {
afterEach(async () => {
await db.delete(financeEvents);
await db.delete(costEvents);
await db.delete(issues);
await db.delete(projects);
await db.delete(agents);
await db.delete(companies);
@ -435,6 +478,143 @@ describeEmbeddedPostgres("cost and finance aggregate overflow handling", () => {
expect(byAgentModelRow?.costCents).toBe(4_000_000_000);
});
it("aggregates issue costs across recursive descendants only", async () => {
const companyId = randomUUID();
const agentId = randomUUID();
const rootIssueId = randomUUID();
const childIssueId = randomUUID();
const grandchildIssueId = randomUUID();
const siblingIssueId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(companies).values({
id: companyId,
name: "Paperclip",
issuePrefix: `T${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
});
await db.insert(agents).values({
id: agentId,
companyId,
name: "Cost Agent",
role: "engineer",
status: "active",
adapterType: "codex_local",
adapterConfig: {},
runtimeConfig: {},
permissions: {},
});
await db.insert(issues).values([
{
id: rootIssueId,
companyId,
title: "Root",
status: "in_progress",
priority: "medium",
issueNumber: 1,
identifier: "TST-1",
},
{
id: childIssueId,
companyId,
parentId: rootIssueId,
title: "Child",
status: "done",
priority: "medium",
issueNumber: 2,
identifier: "TST-2",
},
{
id: grandchildIssueId,
companyId,
parentId: childIssueId,
title: "Grandchild",
status: "done",
priority: "medium",
issueNumber: 3,
identifier: "TST-3",
},
{
id: siblingIssueId,
companyId,
title: "Sibling",
status: "done",
priority: "medium",
issueNumber: 4,
identifier: "TST-4",
},
]);
await db.insert(costEvents).values([
{
companyId,
agentId,
issueId: rootIssueId,
provider: "openai",
biller: "openai",
billingType: "metered_api",
model: "gpt-5",
inputTokens: 10,
cachedInputTokens: 1,
outputTokens: 2,
costCents: 100,
occurredAt: new Date("2026-04-10T00:00:00.000Z"),
},
{
companyId,
agentId,
issueId: childIssueId,
provider: "openai",
biller: "openai",
billingType: "metered_api",
model: "gpt-5",
inputTokens: 20,
cachedInputTokens: 2,
outputTokens: 4,
costCents: 200,
occurredAt: new Date("2026-04-10T00:01:00.000Z"),
},
{
companyId,
agentId,
issueId: grandchildIssueId,
provider: "openai",
biller: "openai",
billingType: "metered_api",
model: "gpt-5",
inputTokens: 30,
cachedInputTokens: 3,
outputTokens: 6,
costCents: 300,
occurredAt: new Date("2026-04-10T00:02:00.000Z"),
},
{
companyId,
agentId,
issueId: siblingIssueId,
provider: "openai",
biller: "openai",
billingType: "metered_api",
model: "gpt-5",
inputTokens: 40,
cachedInputTokens: 4,
outputTokens: 8,
costCents: 400,
occurredAt: new Date("2026-04-10T00:03:00.000Z"),
},
]);
const summary = await costs.issueTreeSummary(companyId, rootIssueId);
expect(summary).toEqual({
issueId: rootIssueId,
issueCount: 3,
includeDescendants: true,
costCents: 600,
inputTokens: 60,
cachedInputTokens: 6,
outputTokens: 12,
});
});
it("aggregates finance event sums above int32 without raising Postgres integer overflow", async () => {
const companyId = randomUUID();