mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-14 01:50:39 +09:00
5 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Devin Foley
|
12cb7b40fd
|
Harden remote workspace sync and restore flows (#5444)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - When an agent runs against a remote target, Paperclip syncs the
workspace out to the remote at run start and restores changes back to
the local workspace at run end
> - The previous restore flow naïvely overwrote local files with
whatever the remote returned, so files that the remote run never touched
but had timestamp/mode drift could be needlessly rewritten — and a
single static `refs/paperclip/ssh-sync/imported` ref made concurrent SSH
workspace exports race on the same git ref
> - This pull request adds a `workspace-restore-merge` module that diffs
a pre-run snapshot against the post-run remote state and only writes
back files the remote actually changed; SSH workspace exports now use a
per-import unique ref so concurrent runs can't trample each other
> - Every adapter's execute path threads the snapshot through
`prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` so the merge has the baseline it
needs
> - The benefit is workspace restores no longer churn untouched files,
and concurrent SSH runs no longer collide on the import ref
## What Changed
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/workspace-restore-merge.{ts,test.ts}`: new
module — directory snapshot (kind/mode/sha256/symlink target) plus
snapshot-aware merge that writes only the files the remote changed
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh.ts`: SSH workspace export uses a
per-import unique ref (`refs/paperclip/ssh-sync/imported/<uuid>`);
restore goes through the new merge helper; `ssh-fixture.test.ts` covers
the unique-ref + merge paths
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.ts` +
`remote-managed-runtime.ts`: thread the snapshot/merge through the
sandbox and SSH paths
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.{ts,test.ts}` +
`execution-target.ts`: helpers for capturing the pre-run snapshot;
`prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` gains required `runId` and
optional `workspaceRemoteDir`, and returns the realized
`workspaceRemoteDir`
- Each adapter's `execute.ts` (acpx, claude, codex, cursor, gemini,
opencode, pi) takes the snapshot at run start and passes it through to
the runtime restore
- Remote execute test mocks updated to match the new
`prepareWorkspaceForSshExecution` return shape and the per-run
`${managedRemoteWorkspace}` cwd subdirectory
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils
--project @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-claude-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-codex-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local --project
@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local` — 196/196 passing
- `pnpm typecheck` clean across the workspace
## Risks
Medium. The restore path now writes a strict subset of what it
previously did — files the remote did not touch are no longer rewritten.
If any flow was relying on a touch-without-content-change being copied
back (timestamp or permission propagation only), that behavior is now
skipped. Snapshot capture adds an O(N-files-in-workspace) hash pass at
run start; the cost is bounded by the existing exclude list. The `runId`
parameter on `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` is now required —
every in-tree caller is updated; out-of-tree adapter authors need to
pass it.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context)
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new module +
every adapter execute path covered
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — N/A (no UI)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
|
||
|
Dotta
|
a1b30c9f35
|
Add planning mode for issue work (#5353)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - Issues are the core unit of work, and issue comments are how board users and agents coordinate execution. > - Some issue conversations need to produce plans and approvals instead of immediate implementation work. > - The existing issue contract did not distinguish standard execution comments from planning-oriented issue work. > - This pull request adds an issue work-mode contract and board UI affordances for standard vs planning mode. > - The benefit is that planning-mode issues can be created, displayed, discussed, and carried through agent heartbeat context without losing the normal issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added `standard` / `planning` issue work-mode contracts across DB, shared validators/types, server issue flows, plugin protocol, and adapter heartbeat payloads. - Added an idempotent `0081_optimal_dormammu` migration for `issues.work_mode`, ordered after current `public-gh/master` migrations. - Updated heartbeat/context summaries and issue-thread interaction behavior so planning work mode is preserved when creating suggested follow-up issues. - Added UI support for planning-mode issue creation, issue rows, detail composer styling, and composer work-mode toggles. - Added focused server/shared/UI tests plus a Playwright visual verification spec for planning-mode surfaces. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` and added durable planning-mode screenshots under `doc/assets/pap-3368/`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/shared packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `PAPERCLIP_E2E_SKIP_LLM=true npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/planning-mode-visual-verification.spec.ts` ## Screenshots Desktop planning detail:  Desktop planning row:  Desktop staged standard toggle:  Mobile planning detail:  Mobile planning row:  ## Risks - Medium migration risk: this adds a non-null issue column. The migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so installations that applied an older branch-local migration number can still apply the final numbered migration safely. - Medium contract risk: issue payloads, plugin payloads, and adapter heartbeat payloads now include work mode; compatibility is handled by defaulting missing values to `standard`. - UI risk is moderate because composer controls changed; focused component tests and visual e2e coverage exercise standard vs planning display and toggle behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in a local Paperclip worktree, with shell/tool use. Exact context-window size is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
11ffd6f2c5
|
Improve ACPX adapter configuration (#5290)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents across several adapter implementations. > - ACPX is a local adapter path that can proxy Claude and Codex-style execution. > - Its configuration needed stronger schema defaults, provider-aware model handling, and better UI support. > - Plugin authors also need clear docs for managed resources. > - This pull request improves ACPX adapter configuration and documents plugin-managed resources. > - The benefit is a more predictable adapter setup path without changing unrelated control-plane behavior. ## What Changed - Improved ACPX config schema, execution config handling, UI build config, and route coverage. - Added ACPX model filtering support and tests. - Updated the agent config form and storybook coverage for ACPX model/provider behavior. - Expanded plugin authoring documentation for managed resources. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/acpx-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/acpx-model-filter.test.ts` ## Risks - Low-to-medium risk: adapter configuration behavior changes can affect ACPX users, but the change is isolated to ACPX/plugin-doc surfaces and covered by targeted adapter tests. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
856c6cb192
|
Fix remote workspace environment shaping (#5118)
> **Stacked PR (part 5 of 7).** Depends on: - PR #5114 - PR #5115 - PR #5116 - PR #5117 > Diff against `master` includes commits from earlier PRs in the stack — the new commit in this PR is the topmost one. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Agents run with a Paperclip-shaped environment (`PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_CWD`, > worktree path, `PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACES_JSON` hints) so the CLI can locate the > correct project tree > - SSH testing reproduced a real failure: a Codex SSH run wrote to > `/tmp/paperclip-env-matrix-...` (the *host* path) instead of the realized > remote workspace at `/home/<user>/paperclip-env-matrix-ssh-claude/...` > because the adapter injected `PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_CWD=/tmp/...` into the > remote env > - Code review on the initial codex-only fix asked to roll the same approach > into every other SSH-capable adapter (claude, acpx, cursor, opencode, gemini, > pi) via a shared helper rather than duplicating per-adapter > - This PR adds `shapePaperclipWorkspaceEnvForExecution` in adapter-utils that, > when the execution target is remote: replaces local cwd with the realized > execution cwd, nulls out worktree path (which has no remote meaning), and > rewrites/strips `cwd` entries in workspace hints based on what was actually > synced. Every adapter calls it before invoking the remote runner > - The benefit is that remote runs see the realized remote workspace, host-local > paths stop leaking into remote env, and the rule is unit-tested in one place ## What Changed - Added `shapePaperclipWorkspaceEnvForExecution` to `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts` with full unit coverage (`server-utils.test.ts`) - Each of acpx-local, claude-local, codex-local, cursor-local, gemini-local, opencode-local, pi-local now calls the new shaper before issuing the remote command and feeds the shaped values into `applyPaperclipWorkspaceEnv` - Per-adapter `execute.remote.test.ts` files extended to cover the new shaping behaviour: localhost paths replaced with remote cwd, foreign-cwd hints stripped, worktree path nulled out for remote targets - `acpx-local/src/server/execute.test.ts` extended with shaping coverage ## Verification - `pnpm test -- server-utils execute.remote` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local test` - Manual QA reproducing the original failure: 1. Provision an E2B sandbox environment for the Paperclip QA company 2. Assign an issue to a remote-targeted claude-local agent and confirm the run starts in the correct remote cwd (no `/Users/...` path leakage in the run logs) 3. Repeat for opencode-local and pi-local ## Risks - Behavioural shift: hints whose `cwd` doesn't match the workspace cwd are now stripped on remote targets. If any adapter relied on a leaked local hint cwd, it will see a missing `cwd` instead. Reviewed all current callers — none do. - Adds a small per-run cost (path resolve + string normalisation) on every remote execution. Negligible. - Worktree path is now nulled out on remote (it has no meaning there). Adapters that previously read the value defensively will continue to work. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.4 (reasoning effort: high) via Codex CLI - Provider: OpenAI - Used to author the code changes in this PR ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — N/A - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
4272c1604d
|
Add ACPX local adapter runtime (#4893)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through a control plane that can start, supervise, and recover agent runs. > - Local adapters are the bridge between Paperclip issues and concrete agent runtimes such as Claude, Codex, and other ACP-compatible tools. > - The roadmap calls out broader “bring your own agent” and claw-style agent support, and ACPX gives Paperclip one path to normalize multiple ACP agents behind a single adapter. > - The branch needed to become one reviewable PR against current `paperclipai/paperclip:master`, without carrying stale base conflicts or generated lockfile churn. > - This pull request adds an experimental built-in `acpx_local` adapter, integrates it through the server/CLI/UI adapter surfaces, and adds regression coverage for runtime execution, skill sync, stream parsing, diagnostics, and log redaction. > - The benefit is that Paperclip can run Claude/Codex/custom ACP agents through ACPX while keeping operator configuration, skills, logging, and transcript rendering inside the existing adapter model. ## What Changed - Added `@paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local` with server execution, config schema, ACPX session handling, CLI formatting, UI config helpers, and stdout parsing. - Registered `acpx_local` across CLI, server, shared constants, UI adapter metadata, adapter capabilities, and agent creation/editing surfaces. - Added ACPX runtime execution support with persistent sessions, local-agent JWT environment handling, skill snapshots, runtime skill materialization, and isolation/security regressions. - Added ACPX adapter diagnostics and marked the adapter experimental in the UI. - Added command/env secret redaction for resolved command metadata in adapter-utils, server event storage, and the Agent Detail invocation UI. - Added Storybook coverage for ACPX config, transcript rendering, and skill states, plus PR screenshots under `docs/pr-screenshots/pap-2944/`. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master`; `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally not included and there are no migration/schema changes. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/acpx-local/src/server/execute.test.ts packages/adapters/acpx-local/src/server/test.test.ts packages/adapters/acpx-local/src/cli/format-event.test.ts packages/adapters/acpx-local/src/ui/parse-stdout.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts server/src/__tests__/redaction.test.ts server/src/__tests__/acpx-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/acpx-local-skill-sync.test.ts server/src/__tests__/acpx-local-adapter-environment.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts ui/src/adapters/metadata.test.ts` — 12 files, 87 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Confirmed PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`, database schema files, or migrations. Screenshots:    ## Risks - Medium risk: this introduces a new built-in adapter package and touches runtime execution, adapter registration, agent config, skills, and transcript rendering. - ACPX and ACP agent behavior can vary by installed tool versions; the adapter is marked experimental to set operator expectations. - `pnpm-lock.yaml` is excluded per repository PR policy, so dependency lock refresh must be handled by the repo’s automation or maintainers. - No database migration risk: no schema or migration files changed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository tool use, shell execution, git operations, and local verification. Exact hosted context window was not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
