mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-14 01:50:39 +09:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies, where work must end with a clear disposition rather than ambiguous agent liveness. > - Recovery currently detects stalled or missing-next-step issues, but source issue recovery can become split across child recovery issues, blockers, and comments. > - That makes it harder for operators and agents to see who owns recovery and what exact action is needed on the original issue. > - Source-scoped recovery actions give the original issue a first-class active recovery state with owner, evidence, wake policy, and resolution outcome. > - This pull request adds the recovery-action data model, backend reconciliation and resolution APIs, and board UI indicators/actions. > - The benefit is clearer stalled-work recovery without losing source issue context or relying on comments as the liveness path. ## What Changed - Added the `issue_recovery_actions` schema, shared types/constants/validators, and an idempotent `0084_issue_recovery_actions` migration ordered after current `master` migrations. - Updated stranded/missing-disposition recovery to create source-scoped recovery actions, wake the recovery owner on the source issue, and avoid locking the source issue for recovery-action wakes. - Added API support for reading active recovery actions on issue detail/list surfaces and resolving them with restored, blocked, cancelled, or false-positive outcomes. - Require blocked recovery resolutions to have an unresolved first-class blocker, and removed the UI shortcut that could mark recovery blocked without a blocker selection path. - Surfaced recovery indicators/actions in the issue UI, blocker notices, active run panels, issue rows, and Storybook coverage. - Updated docs and focused tests for recovery semantics, ownership, races, stale comments, and UI behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 5 files, 72 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering check. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up verification after blocker-resolution guard: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 3 files, 27 tests passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - UI states are available in `ui/storybook/stories/source-issue-recovery.stories.tsx`; screenshot capture helper is `scripts/screenshot-recovery-card.cjs`. ## Risks - Medium: recovery behavior changes from child recovery issue ownership toward source-scoped actions, so operators may see stalled-work state in new places. - Migration risk is mitigated by using the next migration slot after `master` and making the table/constraints/index creation idempotent for anyone who previously applied the old branch-local `0082_dizzy_master_mold` migration. - Existing child recovery issue paths are still guarded for already-created recovery issues, but new source-scoped flows should be watched in CI and Greptile review. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled for shell, Git, GitHub, and local test execution. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
271 lines
8.2 KiB
TypeScript
271 lines
8.2 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockWakeup = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getAncestors: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
getCommentCursor: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
agentService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
documentService: () => ({
|
|
getIssueDocumentPayload: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
|
}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getDefaultCompanyGoal: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
|
wakeup: mockWakeup,
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
getIssueContinuationSummaryDocument: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
projectService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
listByIds: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
routineService: () => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
workProductService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
async function createApp() {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.getAncestors.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getCommentCursor.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
totalComments: 0,
|
|
latestCommentId: null,
|
|
latestCommentAt: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes dependents when the final blocker transitions to done", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "issue-2",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-2",
|
|
blockerIssueIds: ["issue-1", "issue-3"],
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/issue-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-2",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "issue-2",
|
|
resolvedBlockerIssueId: "issue-1",
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes the parent when all direct children become terminal", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-9",
|
|
childIssueIds: ["child-0", "child-1"],
|
|
childIssueSummaries: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-0",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "First child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "First child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:05:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "Last child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
childIssueSummaryTruncated: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/child-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-9",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_children_completed",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "parent-1",
|
|
completedChildIssueId: "child-1",
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-101", summary: "Last child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-100", summary: "First child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|