mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-14 01:50:39 +09:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies, where work must end with a clear disposition rather than ambiguous agent liveness. > - Recovery currently detects stalled or missing-next-step issues, but source issue recovery can become split across child recovery issues, blockers, and comments. > - That makes it harder for operators and agents to see who owns recovery and what exact action is needed on the original issue. > - Source-scoped recovery actions give the original issue a first-class active recovery state with owner, evidence, wake policy, and resolution outcome. > - This pull request adds the recovery-action data model, backend reconciliation and resolution APIs, and board UI indicators/actions. > - The benefit is clearer stalled-work recovery without losing source issue context or relying on comments as the liveness path. ## What Changed - Added the `issue_recovery_actions` schema, shared types/constants/validators, and an idempotent `0084_issue_recovery_actions` migration ordered after current `master` migrations. - Updated stranded/missing-disposition recovery to create source-scoped recovery actions, wake the recovery owner on the source issue, and avoid locking the source issue for recovery-action wakes. - Added API support for reading active recovery actions on issue detail/list surfaces and resolving them with restored, blocked, cancelled, or false-positive outcomes. - Require blocked recovery resolutions to have an unresolved first-class blocker, and removed the UI shortcut that could mark recovery blocked without a blocker selection path. - Surfaced recovery indicators/actions in the issue UI, blocker notices, active run panels, issue rows, and Storybook coverage. - Updated docs and focused tests for recovery semantics, ownership, races, stale comments, and UI behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 5 files, 72 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering check. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up verification after blocker-resolution guard: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 3 files, 27 tests passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - UI states are available in `ui/storybook/stories/source-issue-recovery.stories.tsx`; screenshot capture helper is `scripts/screenshot-recovery-card.cjs`. ## Risks - Medium: recovery behavior changes from child recovery issue ownership toward source-scoped actions, so operators may see stalled-work state in new places. - Migration risk is mitigated by using the next migration slot after `master` and making the table/constraints/index creation idempotent for anyone who previously applied the old branch-local `0082_dizzy_master_mold` migration. - Existing child recovery issue paths are still guarded for already-created recovery issues, but new source-scoped flows should be watched in CI and Greptile review. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled for shell, Git, GitHub, and local test execution. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
272 lines
8.6 KiB
TypeScript
272 lines
8.6 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getFeedbackTraceById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getFeedbackTraceBundle: vi.fn(),
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
listFeedbackTraces: vi.fn(),
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockFeedbackExportService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
flushPendingFeedbackTraces: vi.fn(async () => ({ attempted: 1, sent: 1, failed: 0 })),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockEnvironmentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockExecutionWorkspaceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({}));
|
|
const mockIssueReferenceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
})),
|
|
emptySummary: vi.fn(() => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] })),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: vi.fn(async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] })),
|
|
syncComment: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
syncDocument: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
syncIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
|
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
|
|
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
|
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => mockIssueReferenceService,
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/environments.js", () => ({
|
|
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/execution-workspaces.js", () => ({
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
import("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any, { feedbackExportService: mockFeedbackExportService }));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue feedback trace routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/environments.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/execution-workspaces.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockFeedbackExportService.flushPendingFeedbackTraces.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
attempted: 1,
|
|
sent: 1,
|
|
failed: 0,
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("flushes a newly shared feedback trace immediately after saving the vote", async () => {
|
|
const targetId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1",
|
|
});
|
|
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
vote: {
|
|
targetType: "issue_comment",
|
|
targetId,
|
|
vote: "up",
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
},
|
|
traceId: "trace-1",
|
|
consentEnabledNow: false,
|
|
persistedSharingPreference: null,
|
|
sharingEnabled: true,
|
|
});
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: true,
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post("/api/issues/issue-1/feedback-votes")
|
|
.send({
|
|
targetType: "issue_comment",
|
|
targetId,
|
|
vote: "up",
|
|
allowSharing: true,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect([200, 201]).toContain(res.status);
|
|
expect(mockFeedbackExportService.flushPendingFeedbackTraces).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
traceId: "trace-1",
|
|
limit: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects non-board callers before fetching a feedback trace", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1");
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceById).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns 404 when a board user lacks access to the trace company", async () => {
|
|
mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "trace-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-2",
|
|
});
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns 404 for bundle fetches when a board user lacks access to the trace company", async () => {
|
|
mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceBundle.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "trace-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-2",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
files: [],
|
|
});
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1/bundle");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|