paperclip/server/src/__tests__/agent-adapter-validation-routes.test.ts
Dotta 38c185fb8b
[codex] Add agent permissions and controls plan (#6386)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies by keeping
task ownership, approvals, and operator control inside one control
plane.
> - Agent permissions and plugin-hosted company settings sit on the
boundary between autonomy and governance.
> - V1 needs scoped task assignment rules, plugin extension points, and
clearer company access surfaces without weakening company boundaries.
> - The branch builds the core authorization service, plugin SDK/host
APIs, and UI simplifications needed to support those controls.
> - Paperclip EE plugin surfaces were intentionally moved out of this
core PR per review direction, so this PR now carries only the public
core/plugin infrastructure work.
> - The latest updates preserve the PAP-9937 branch changes that belong
in this PR, remove the `design/` artifacts, and exclude the experimental
`plugin-briefs` package.
> - Greptile feedback was applied through the authorization/audit paths
and the final cleanup commit was re-reviewed at 5/5 with no unresolved
Greptile threads.
> - The benefit is safer assignment control with extension hooks for
richer permission products while preserving simple defaults for normal
operators.

## What Changed

- Added scoped task-assignment authorization decisions and routed
issue/agent assignment mutations through the authorization service.
- Added plugin SDK and host APIs for company settings slots,
authorization policy/grant management, assignment previews, and bridge
invocation scope propagation.
- Simplified core company access UI and moved advanced controls behind
plugin-provided settings surfaces.
- Added retry-now affordances for blocked issue next-step notices.
- Added protected-assignment enforcement for persisted
agent/project/issue policies, including explicit-grant fallback
behavior.
- Added incremental principal-access compatibility backfill for active
agent memberships and role-default human permission grants.
- Added the Markdown code block wrap action fix from the latest branch
changes.
- Removed `design/` artifacts from the PR and removed
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs` from the final diff.
- Addressed Greptile feedback for plugin actor sanitization, legacy
membership handling, audit pagination, unknown grant-scope metadata, and
startup test mocks.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 2 files passed, 54
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 3 files passed, 62
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-access-authorization-host-services.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` -> 3 files
passed, 28 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` -> passed.
- `git diff --check` -> passed.
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` -> passed.
- `CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> passed
with no lockfile update.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.interaction.test.tsx` -> 1 test passed.
- `git ls-files design packages/plugins/plugin-briefs | wc -l` -> 0.
- GitHub CI on `40cd83b53` -> all checks passed, merge state `CLEAN`.
- Greptile on `40cd83b53` -> 5/5, 102 files reviewed, 0
comments/annotations added, 0 unresolved review threads.
- Confirmed the PR diff contains no `design/`,
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Medium: task assignment authorization paths are behaviorally stricter
for protected/private policy data, so existing plugin-authored policies
may block assignment until explicit grants or approval flows are
configured.
- Medium: plugin-host authorization APIs expand the surface area
available to trusted plugins and need careful review for company
scoping.
- Low: startup now performs a principal-access compatibility backfill,
but the migration and runtime backfill use conflict-tolerant inserts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled workflow with shell,
git, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-22 08:12:52 -05:00

270 lines
8.6 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import type { ServerAdapterModule } from "../adapters/index.js";
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
create: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
decide: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
ensureMembership: vi.fn(),
setPrincipalPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockCompanySkillService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listRuntimeSkillEntries: vi.fn(),
resolveRequestedSkillKeys: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
normalizeAdapterConfigForPersistence: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, config: Record<string, unknown>) => config),
resolveAdapterConfigForRuntime: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, config: Record<string, unknown>) => ({ config })),
}));
const mockAgentInstructionsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
materializeManagedBundle: vi.fn(),
getBundle: vi.fn(),
readFile: vi.fn(),
updateBundle: vi.fn(),
writeFile: vi.fn(),
deleteFile: vi.fn(),
exportFiles: vi.fn(),
ensureManagedBundle: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockBudgetService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
upsertPolicy: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
cancelActiveForAgent: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssueApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
linkManyForApproval: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
create: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ censorUsernameInLogs: false })),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
agentInstructionsService: () => mockAgentInstructionsService,
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
approvalService: () => mockApprovalService,
companySkillService: () => mockCompanySkillService,
budgetService: () => mockBudgetService,
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
issueApprovalService: () => mockIssueApprovalService,
issueService: () => ({}),
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: vi.fn((_agent, config) => config),
workspaceOperationService: () => ({}),
}));
vi.mock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
agentInstructionsService: () => mockAgentInstructionsService,
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
approvalService: () => mockApprovalService,
companySkillService: () => mockCompanySkillService,
budgetService: () => mockBudgetService,
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
issueApprovalService: () => mockIssueApprovalService,
issueService: () => ({}),
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: vi.fn((_agent, config) => config),
workspaceOperationService: () => ({}),
}));
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
}
const externalAdapter: ServerAdapterModule = {
type: "external_test",
execute: async () => ({ exitCode: 0, signal: null, timedOut: false }),
testEnvironment: async () => ({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "pass",
checks: [],
testedAt: new Date(0).toISOString(),
}),
};
const missingAdapterType = "missing_adapter_validation_test";
async function createApp() {
const [{ agentRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/agents.js")>("../routes/agents.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
const db = {
select: vi.fn(() => ({
from: vi.fn(() => ({
where: vi.fn(async () => [
{
id: "company-1",
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
},
]),
})),
})),
};
app.use("/api", agentRoutes(db as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
async function requestApp(
app: express.Express,
buildRequest: (baseUrl: string) => request.Test,
) {
const { createServer } = await vi.importActual<typeof import("node:http")>("node:http");
const server = createServer(app);
try {
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", resolve);
});
const address = server.address();
if (!address || typeof address === "string") {
throw new Error("Expected HTTP server to listen on a TCP port");
}
return await buildRequest(`http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}`);
} finally {
if (server.listening) {
await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => {
server.close((error) => {
if (error) reject(error);
else resolve();
});
});
}
}
}
async function unregisterTestAdapter(type: string) {
const { unregisterServerAdapter } = await import("../adapters/index.js");
unregisterServerAdapter(type);
}
describe("agent routes adapter validation", () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../routes/agents.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/agents.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockCompanySkillService.listRuntimeSkillEntries.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockCompanySkillService.resolveRequestedSkillKeys.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant",
});
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(true);
mockAccessService.ensureMembership.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockAccessService.setPrincipalPermission.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockAgentService.create.mockImplementation(async (_companyId: string, input: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
name: String(input.name ?? "Agent"),
urlKey: "agent",
role: String(input.role ?? "general"),
title: null,
icon: null,
status: "idle",
reportsTo: null,
capabilities: null,
adapterType: String(input.adapterType ?? "process"),
adapterConfig: (input.adapterConfig as Record<string, unknown> | undefined) ?? {},
runtimeConfig: (input.runtimeConfig as Record<string, unknown> | undefined) ?? {},
budgetMonthlyCents: 0,
spentMonthlyCents: 0,
pauseReason: null,
pausedAt: null,
permissions: { canCreateAgents: false },
lastHeartbeatAt: null,
metadata: null,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
}));
await unregisterTestAdapter("external_test");
await unregisterTestAdapter(missingAdapterType);
});
afterEach(async () => {
await unregisterTestAdapter("external_test");
await unregisterTestAdapter(missingAdapterType);
});
it("creates agents for dynamically registered external adapter types", async () => {
const { registerServerAdapter } = await import("../adapters/index.js");
registerServerAdapter(externalAdapter);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) =>
request(baseUrl)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/agents")
.send({
name: "External Agent",
adapterType: "external_test",
}),
);
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(201);
expect(res.body.adapterType).toBe("external_test");
});
it("rejects unknown adapter types even when schema accepts arbitrary strings", async () => {
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) =>
request(baseUrl)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/agents")
.send({
name: "Missing Adapter",
adapterType: missingAdapterType,
}),
);
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(422);
expect(String(res.body.error ?? res.body.message ?? "")).toContain(`Unknown adapter type: ${missingAdapterType}`);
});
});