mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-17 03:10:38 +09:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Agent runs can end productively while the source issue still lacks a durable final disposition. > - That leaves the control plane unsure whether to resume, escalate, or close the work. > - Issue comments also need a presentation contract so system-authored recovery notices can render as first-class thread messages without overloading normal comments. > - This pull request adds successful-run handoff recovery, comment presentation metadata, and system notice rendering. > - The benefit is stricter task liveness with clearer operator-facing recovery state. ## What Changed - Added successful-run handoff decisions, wake payloads, escalation behavior, and recovery tests. - Added issue comment presentation metadata with migration `0078_white_darwin.sql` and shared/server/company portability support. - Rendered recovery/system notices in issue chat with dedicated UI components, fixtures, tests, and storybook/lab coverage. - Included the current recovery model-profile hint patch so automatic recovery follow-ups use the cheap profile. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts ui/src/components/SystemNotice.test.tsx ui/src/lib/system-notice-comment.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx` ## Risks - Migration-bearing PR: merge this before any other branch that might later add a migration. - The branch touches both recovery services and issue-thread rendering, so review should pay attention to recovery wake idempotency and comment metadata compatibility. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
566 lines
19 KiB
TypeScript
566 lines
19 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
|
|
import { and, eq, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
activityLog,
|
|
agents,
|
|
companies,
|
|
createDb,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
issueComments,
|
|
issues,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport,
|
|
startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase,
|
|
} from "./helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
|
|
import { MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import {
|
|
DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_MAX_REFRESH_COMMENTS,
|
|
DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_INTERVAL_MS,
|
|
PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_COMMENT_PREFIX,
|
|
PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_ORIGIN_KIND,
|
|
productivityReviewService,
|
|
} from "../services/productivity-review.ts";
|
|
|
|
const embeddedPostgresSupport = await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
|
|
const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
|
|
|
|
if (!embeddedPostgresSupport.supported) {
|
|
console.warn(
|
|
`Skipping embedded Postgres productivity review tests on this host: ${embeddedPostgresSupport.reason ?? "unsupported environment"}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describeEmbeddedPostgres("productivity review service", () => {
|
|
let tempDb: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | null = null;
|
|
let db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
tempDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-productivity-review-");
|
|
db = createDb(tempDb.connectionString);
|
|
}, 30_000);
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await db.execute(sql.raw(`TRUNCATE TABLE "companies" CASCADE`));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
await tempDb?.cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function seedAssignedIssue(opts?: {
|
|
status?: "todo" | "in_progress";
|
|
startedAt?: Date;
|
|
parentId?: string | null;
|
|
originKind?: string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const companyId = randomUUID();
|
|
const managerId = randomUUID();
|
|
const coderId = randomUUID();
|
|
const issueId = randomUUID();
|
|
const issuePrefix = `PR${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`;
|
|
const createdAt = new Date("2026-04-28T10:00:00.000Z");
|
|
|
|
await db.insert(companies).values({
|
|
id: companyId,
|
|
name: "Productivity Review Co",
|
|
issuePrefix,
|
|
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(agents).values([
|
|
{
|
|
id: managerId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: "CTO",
|
|
role: "cto",
|
|
status: "idle",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
adapterConfig: {},
|
|
runtimeConfig: {},
|
|
permissions: {},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: coderId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
role: "engineer",
|
|
status: "idle",
|
|
reportsTo: managerId,
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
adapterConfig: {},
|
|
runtimeConfig: {},
|
|
permissions: {},
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values({
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
title: "Implement data import",
|
|
status: opts?.status ?? "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
parentId: opts?.parentId ?? null,
|
|
originKind: opts?.originKind ?? "manual",
|
|
issueNumber: 1,
|
|
identifier: `${issuePrefix}-1`,
|
|
startedAt: opts?.startedAt ?? createdAt,
|
|
createdAt,
|
|
updatedAt: createdAt,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
return { companyId, managerId, coderId, issueId, issuePrefix, createdAt };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function insertRuns(input: {
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
agentId: string;
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
count: number;
|
|
now: Date;
|
|
withRunComments?: boolean;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const runs: Array<typeof heartbeatRuns.$inferInsert> = [];
|
|
for (let index = 0; index < input.count; index += 1) {
|
|
const runId = randomUUID();
|
|
const createdAt = new Date(input.now.getTime() - index * 60_000);
|
|
runs.push({
|
|
id: runId,
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
agentId: input.agentId,
|
|
status: "succeeded",
|
|
invocationSource: "assignment",
|
|
triggerDetail: "system",
|
|
startedAt: createdAt,
|
|
finishedAt: new Date(createdAt.getTime() + 30_000),
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: input.issueId, taskId: input.issueId },
|
|
livenessState: "advanced",
|
|
nextAction: "Continue processing the next batch.",
|
|
createdAt,
|
|
updatedAt: createdAt,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values(runs);
|
|
|
|
if (input.withRunComments) {
|
|
await db.insert(issueComments).values(
|
|
runs.map((run, index) => ({
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
issueId: input.issueId,
|
|
authorAgentId: input.agentId,
|
|
createdByRunId: run.id,
|
|
body: `Progress update ${index}`,
|
|
createdAt: run.createdAt as Date,
|
|
updatedAt: run.createdAt as Date,
|
|
})),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return runs;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function listProductivityReviews(companyId: string) {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.companyId, companyId), eq(issues.originKind, PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_ORIGIN_KIND)))
|
|
.orderBy(issues.createdAt);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function listRefreshComments(reviewIssueId: string) {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(issueComments.issueId, reviewIssueId),
|
|
sql`${issueComments.body} like ${`${PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_COMMENT_PREFIX}%`}`,
|
|
))
|
|
.orderBy(issueComments.createdAt);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("creates exactly one manager-assigned review for a no-comment run streak and rate-limits immediate refresh", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const service = productivityReviewService(db);
|
|
const first = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
const second = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
|
|
expect(first.created).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(second.updated).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(second.existing).toBe(1);
|
|
const reviews = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
expect(reviews).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.parentId).toBe(seeded.issueId);
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.assigneeAgentId).toBe(seeded.managerId);
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.assigneeAdapterOverrides).toEqual({ modelProfile: "cheap" });
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.originId).toBe(seeded.issueId);
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.originFingerprint).toBe(`productivity-review:${seeded.issueId}`);
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.description).toContain("Primary trigger: `no_comment_streak`");
|
|
expect(reviews[0]?.description).toContain("No-comment completed-run streak: 10");
|
|
|
|
expect(await listRefreshComments(reviews[0]!.id)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("refreshes open productivity reviews only once per interval and caps refresh comments", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const service = productivityReviewService(db);
|
|
await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
|
|
const firstRefreshAt = new Date(now.getTime() + DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_INTERVAL_MS);
|
|
const firstRefresh = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: firstRefreshAt,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
const tooSoonRefresh = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: new Date(firstRefreshAt.getTime() + 30 * 60 * 1000),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: new Date(firstRefreshAt.getTime() + DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_INTERVAL_MS),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: new Date(firstRefreshAt.getTime() + 2 * DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_INTERVAL_MS),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
const cappedRefresh = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: new Date(firstRefreshAt.getTime() + 3 * DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_REFRESH_INTERVAL_MS),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(firstRefresh.updated).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(tooSoonRefresh.updated).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(tooSoonRefresh.existing).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(cappedRefresh.updated).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(cappedRefresh.existing).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(await listRefreshComments(review!.id)).toHaveLength(DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_MAX_REFRESH_COMMENTS);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("caps productivity review creation per source issue in the rolling creation window", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values(
|
|
[8, 9, 10].map((hoursAgo, index) => {
|
|
const createdAt = new Date(now.getTime() - hoursAgo * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
|
return {
|
|
id: randomUUID(),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
title: `Completed productivity review ${index + 1}`,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "high",
|
|
originKind: PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_ORIGIN_KIND,
|
|
originId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
originFingerprint: `productivity-review:${seeded.issueId}`,
|
|
parentId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
issueNumber: index + 2,
|
|
identifier: `${seeded.issuePrefix}-${index + 2}`,
|
|
createdAt,
|
|
updatedAt: createdAt,
|
|
};
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.creationCapped).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId)).toHaveLength(3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not count cancelled productivity reviews toward the creation cap", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values(
|
|
[8, 9, 10].map((hoursAgo, index) => {
|
|
const createdAt = new Date(now.getTime() - hoursAgo * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
|
return {
|
|
id: randomUUID(),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
title: `Cancelled productivity review ${index + 1}`,
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
priority: "high",
|
|
originKind: PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_ORIGIN_KIND,
|
|
originId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
originFingerprint: `productivity-review:${seeded.issueId}`,
|
|
parentId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
issueNumber: index + 2,
|
|
identifier: `${seeded.issuePrefix}-${index + 2}`,
|
|
createdAt,
|
|
updatedAt: createdAt,
|
|
};
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(result.creationCapped).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId)).toHaveLength(4);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("creates a long-active review without enabling a continuation hold", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue({
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
startedAt: new Date(now.getTime() - 7 * 60 * 60 * 1000),
|
|
});
|
|
const service = productivityReviewService(db);
|
|
|
|
const result = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
const hold = await service.isProductivityReviewContinuationHoldActive({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(1);
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
expect(review?.description).toContain("Primary trigger: `long_active_duration`");
|
|
expect(review?.priority).toBe("medium");
|
|
expect(hold.held).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("creates a high-churn review even when every sampled run has a progress comment", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: 10,
|
|
now,
|
|
withRunComments: true,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(1);
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
expect(review?.description).toContain("Primary trigger: `high_churn`");
|
|
expect(review?.description).toContain("Runs in rolling windows: 10/1h");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("ignores non-assignee comments when evaluating high-churn productivity reviews", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: 9,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
const managerRuns = await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.managerId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: 10,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issueComments).values(
|
|
managerRuns.map((run, index) => ({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
authorAgentId: seeded.managerId,
|
|
createdByRunId: run.id,
|
|
body: `Manager note ${index}`,
|
|
createdAt: run.createdAt as Date,
|
|
updatedAt: run.createdAt as Date,
|
|
})),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("skips productivity-review descendants so reviews cannot recursively spawn reviews", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
const reviewId = randomUUID();
|
|
const childId = randomUUID();
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values({
|
|
id: reviewId,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
title: "Existing productivity review",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "high",
|
|
originKind: PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_ORIGIN_KIND,
|
|
originId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
originFingerprint: `productivity-review:${seeded.issueId}`,
|
|
parentId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
issueNumber: 2,
|
|
identifier: `${seeded.issuePrefix}-2`,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values({
|
|
id: childId,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
title: "Review follow-up child",
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
parentId: reviewId,
|
|
issueNumber: 3,
|
|
identifier: `${seeded.issuePrefix}-3`,
|
|
startedAt: new Date(now.getTime() - 7 * 60 * 60 * 1000),
|
|
});
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: childId,
|
|
count: 10,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
const reviews = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.created).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(reviews).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("treats a recently completed review as a snooze window", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: 10,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
const service = productivityReviewService(db);
|
|
await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issues)
|
|
.set({ status: "done", updatedAt: now })
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, review!.id));
|
|
|
|
const result = await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now: new Date(now.getTime() + 30 * 60 * 1000),
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
const reviews = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.snoozed).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(reviews).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reports and logs soft-stop holds for open no-comment reviews", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
const [latestRun] = await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: 10,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
const service = productivityReviewService(db);
|
|
await service.reconcileProductivityReviews({ now, companyId: seeded.companyId });
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
|
|
const hold = await service.isProductivityReviewContinuationHoldActive({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(hold.held).toBe(true);
|
|
if (!hold.held) return;
|
|
|
|
await service.recordContinuationHold({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
runId: latestRun!.id as string,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
reviewIssueId: review!.id,
|
|
trigger: hold.trigger,
|
|
reason: hold.reason,
|
|
});
|
|
const activities = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(activityLog)
|
|
.where(eq(activityLog.action, "issue.productivity_review_continuation_held"));
|
|
expect(activities).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(activities[0]?.entityId).toBe(seeded.issueId);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("clamps poisoned requestDepth metadata instead of aborting productivity reconciliation", async () => {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-28T12:00:00.000Z");
|
|
const seeded = await seedAssignedIssue();
|
|
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issues)
|
|
.set({ requestDepth: 2_147_483_647 })
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, seeded.issueId));
|
|
|
|
await insertRuns({
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
agentId: seeded.coderId,
|
|
issueId: seeded.issueId,
|
|
count: DEFAULT_PRODUCTIVITY_REVIEW_NO_COMMENT_STREAK_RUNS,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await productivityReviewService(db).reconcileProductivityReviews({
|
|
now,
|
|
companyId: seeded.companyId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.failed).toBe(0);
|
|
const [review] = await listProductivityReviews(seeded.companyId);
|
|
expect(review?.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|