paperclip/server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts
Devin Foley d9f91576a0
Add accepted-plan decomposition exact-once guards and UI state (#6831)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, so
planning approvals and child-issue fan-out are part of the core
control-plane loop.
> - Accepted plans are supposed to be a safe bridge from planning into
execution, especially when agents wake from review decisions and reuse
isolated workspaces.
> - The duplicate-subtask incident showed that an accepted plan revision
could be interpreted more than once across overlapping runs, which broke
the single-source-of-truth model for issue decomposition.
> - Fixing that required tightening the backend contract first:
accepted-plan decomposition needs an exact-once fingerprint, durable
claim state, and retry-safe child creation.
> - Once that backend behavior existed, the board still needed
visibility into what happened, so the issue detail view needed a
dedicated decomposition section instead of forcing operators to
reconstruct child creation from raw activity.
> - This pull request adds the exact-once decomposition primitive,
hardens wake routing and regressions around the incident, and surfaces
decomposition state in the UI so future incidents are both prevented and
easier to inspect.

## What Changed

- Added accepted-plan decomposition semantics to
`doc/execution-semantics.md`, including the exact-once fingerprint,
durable claim/result expectations, and retry/resume behavior.
- Added persistent accepted-plan decomposition claims in the backend,
including schema, shared types/validators, service logic, and issue
routes for creating and listing decomposition state.
- Hardened heartbeat routing so an accepted-plan continuation stays
scoped to the relevant planning issue instead of opportunistically
re-decomposing another accepted issue on the same assignee.
- Added regression coverage for the original failure modes: concurrent
same-parent retries, cross-issue accepted-plan isolation, and partial
child recreation under the same fingerprint.
- Added the `Plan decomposition` issue-detail section plus supporting
API/query-key/activity formatting updates so operators can see revision
status, owner, child counts, and the linked child issues directly in the
UI.
- Included the small follow-up UI fix so the decomposition section still
renders when the issue work mode is no longer `planning`.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"lists persisted decompositions with child issue summaries"`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"accepted plan decomposition"
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-accepted-plan-workspace-refresh.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts`
- Manual UI path: create a planning issue without an isolated execution
workspace, add a `plan` document, accept the `request_confirmation`, let
Paperclip create child issues, then reopen the parent issue detail page
and confirm the `Plan decomposition` section shows the accepted
revision, status, idempotent-claim badge, and child links.
- Separate follow-up bug noted during manual UI validation: accepting a
plan on an issue whose run never records `workspace_finalize` is tracked
in `PAPA-445` and is not part of this PR’s fix scope.

## Risks

- This adds a new migration and a large Drizzle snapshot update;
reviewers should confirm the schema shape and generated metadata match
the intended decomposition table.
- The exact-once claim changes sit on the accepted-plan fan-out path, so
regressions there could block legitimate child creation or mis-handle
retries if the claim state machine is wrong.
- The new UI only appears when decomposition records exist; reviewers
should use the manual verification path above rather than expecting
existing issues on a stale local instance to show the section
automatically.
- `PAPA-445` remains an open follow-up for the `workspace_finalize`
accept gate when a planning handoff never records finalize; that bug can
interfere with reproducing the UI flow on isolated workspaces but does
not change the correctness of the exact-once decomposition feature
itself.

> Checked `ROADMAP.md`: this PR is a bug fix / control-plane hardening
change for accepted-plan decomposition, not a new uncoordinated roadmap
feature.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` (GPT-5-based coding agent;
exact backend model ID/context window not exposed in the run context),
with repository tool use, shell execution, and code-editing
capabilities.

<img width="806" height="1069" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-27 at 11 05
48 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b00b670-96cd-4470-b0a3-581743bcae28"
/>


## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-28 23:30:18 -07:00

348 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getGeneral: vi.fn(),
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
updateGeneral: vi.fn(),
updateExperimental: vi.fn(),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
buildIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryPreview: vi.fn(),
reconcileIssueGraphLiveness: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
}
async function createApp(actor: any) {
const [{ errorHandler }, { instanceSettingsRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/instance-settings.js")>("../routes/instance-settings.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
req.actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", instanceSettingsRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("instance settings routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/instance-settings.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.buildIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryPreview.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.reconcileIssueGraphLiveness.mockReset();
mockLogActivity.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
enableEnvironments: false,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: false,
enableCloudSync: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecovery: true,
issueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryLookbackHours: 24,
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
experimental: {
enableEnvironments: true,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: true,
enableCloudSync: true,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecovery: true,
issueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryLookbackHours: 24,
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1", "company-2"]);
mockHeartbeatService.buildIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryPreview.mockResolvedValue({
lookbackHours: 24,
cutoff: "2026-04-26T12:00:00.000Z",
generatedAt: "2026-04-27T12:00:00.000Z",
findings: 1,
recoverableFindings: 1,
skippedOutsideLookback: 0,
items: [],
});
mockHeartbeatService.reconcileIssueGraphLiveness.mockResolvedValue({
findings: 1,
autoRecoveryEnabled: true,
lookbackHours: 24,
cutoff: "2026-04-26T12:00:00.000Z",
escalationsCreated: 1,
existingEscalations: 0,
skipped: 0,
skippedAutoRecoveryDisabled: 0,
skippedOutsideLookback: 0,
escalationIssueIds: ["issue-2"],
});
});
it("allows local board users to read and update experimental settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const getRes = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/experimental");
expect(getRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(getRes.body).toEqual({
enableEnvironments: false,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: false,
enableCloudSync: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecovery: true,
issueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryLookbackHours: 24,
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
}, 10_000);
it("allows local board users to update guarded dev-server auto-restart", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: true })
.expect(200);
expect(
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mock.calls.some(
([patch]) => patch?.autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle === true,
),
).toBe(true);
});
it("allows local board users to update issue graph liveness auto-recovery", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({
enableIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecovery: true,
issueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryLookbackHours: 12,
})
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecovery: true,
issueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryLookbackHours: 12,
});
});
it("previews issue graph liveness recovery candidates before enabling", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/settings/experimental/issue-graph-liveness-auto-recovery/preview")
.send({ lookbackHours: 12 })
.expect(200);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({ lookbackHours: 24, recoverableFindings: 1 });
expect(mockHeartbeatService.buildIssueGraphLivenessAutoRecoveryPreview).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
lookbackHours: 12,
});
});
it("kicks off issue graph liveness recovery on demand", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/settings/experimental/issue-graph-liveness-auto-recovery/run")
.send({ lookbackHours: 12 })
.expect(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.reconcileIssueGraphLiveness).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
runId: null,
force: true,
lookbackHours: 12,
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("allows local board users to update environment controls", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableEnvironments: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableEnvironments: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to read and update general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const getRes = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(getRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(getRes.body).toEqual({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
});
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("allows non-admin board users to read general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
});
it("rejects signed-in users without company access from reading general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-2",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [],
memberships: [],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects non-admin board users from updating general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ censorUsernameInLogs: true, keyboardShortcuts: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects agent callers", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "not_allowed" });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});