paperclip/server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
Dotta 9a8d219949
[codex] Stabilize tests and local maintenance assets (#4423)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable
local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work
> - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model
selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed
Playwright's headless shell binary
> - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated
review artifact from the working branch
> - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so
they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes
> - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner
local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs

## What Changed

- Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test
isolation.
- Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized
Claude/company-import related assertions.
- Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models.
- Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect
`chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing.
- Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts
src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts`
from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config
vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file,
3 tests.
- `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh &&
scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected
`chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them.
- `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f
ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance --
. ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config
cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree
because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the
worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Risks

- Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests
are scheduled.
- Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified
third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those
generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that
artifact before merge.
- No database migrations.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior;
the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation
from the source branch.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 15:11:42 -05:00

339 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
approve: vi.fn(),
reject: vi.fn(),
requestRevision: vi.fn(),
resubmit: vi.fn(),
listComments: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssueApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssuesForApproval: vi.fn(),
linkManyForApproval: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
approvalService: () => mockApprovalService,
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
issueApprovalService: () => mockIssueApprovalService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
}));
}
async function createApp(actorOverrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
const [{ errorHandler }, { approvalRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
import("../middleware/index.js"),
import("../routes/approvals.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
...actorOverrides,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", approvalRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
async function createAgentApp() {
const [{ errorHandler }, { approvalRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
import("../middleware/index.js"),
import("../routes/approvals.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "api_key",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", approvalRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("approval routes idempotent retries", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/approvals.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockApprovalService.list.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.getById.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.create.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.approve.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.reject.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.requestRevision.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.resubmit.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.listComments.mockReset();
mockApprovalService.addComment.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockReset();
mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval.mockReset();
mockIssueApprovalService.linkManyForApproval.mockReset();
mockSecretService.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence.mockReset();
mockLogActivity.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue({ id: "wake-1" });
mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval.mockResolvedValue([{ id: "issue-1" }]);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("does not emit duplicate approval side effects when approve is already resolved", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-1",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "approved",
payload: {},
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
});
mockApprovalService.approve.mockResolvedValue({
approval: {
id: "approval-1",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "approved",
payload: {},
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
},
applied: false,
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-1/approve")
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not emit duplicate rejection logs when reject is already resolved", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-1",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "rejected",
payload: {},
});
mockApprovalService.reject.mockResolvedValue({
approval: {
id: "approval-1",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "rejected",
payload: {},
},
applied: false,
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-1/reject")
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects approval decisions for companies outside the caller scope", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-2",
companyId: "company-2",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "pending",
payload: {},
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-2/approve")
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockApprovalService.approve).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects approval revision requests for companies outside the caller scope", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-3",
companyId: "company-2",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "pending",
payload: {},
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-3/request-revision")
.send({ decisionNote: "Need changes" });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockApprovalService.requestRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on approve", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-4",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "pending",
payload: {},
requestedByAgentId: null,
});
mockApprovalService.approve.mockResolvedValue({
approval: {
id: "approval-4",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "approved",
payload: {},
requestedByAgentId: null,
},
applied: true,
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-4/approve")
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "ship it" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockApprovalService.approve).toHaveBeenCalledWith("approval-4", "user-1", "ship it");
});
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on reject", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-5",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "pending",
payload: {},
});
mockApprovalService.reject.mockResolvedValue({
approval: {
id: "approval-5",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "rejected",
payload: {},
},
applied: true,
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-5/reject")
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "not now" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockApprovalService.reject).toHaveBeenCalledWith("approval-5", "user-1", "not now");
});
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on request revision", async () => {
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-6",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "pending",
payload: {},
});
mockApprovalService.requestRevision.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-6",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "hire_agent",
status: "revision_requested",
payload: {},
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/approvals/approval-6/request-revision")
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "Need changes" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockApprovalService.requestRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"approval-6",
"user-1",
"Need changes",
);
});
it("lets agents create generic issue-linked board approval requests", async () => {
mockApprovalService.create.mockResolvedValue({
id: "approval-1",
companyId: "company-1",
type: "request_board_approval",
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
requestedByUserId: null,
status: "pending",
payload: { title: "Approve hosting spend" },
decisionNote: null,
decidedByUserId: null,
decidedAt: null,
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T00:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T00:00:00.000Z"),
});
const res = await request(await createAgentApp())
.post("/api/companies/company-1/approvals")
.send({
type: "request_board_approval",
issueIds: ["00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"],
payload: { title: "Approve hosting spend" },
});
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
companyId: "company-1",
type: "request_board_approval",
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
requestedByUserId: null,
status: "pending",
});
expect(mockSecretService.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueApprovalService.linkManyForApproval).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"approval-1",
["00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"],
{ agentId: "agent-1", userId: null },
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
companyId: "company-1",
actorType: "agent",
actorId: "agent-1",
action: "approval.created",
}),
);
});
});