mirror of
https://github.com/alkimake/paperclip.git
synced 2026-06-15 18:30:39 +09:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work > - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed Playwright's headless shell binary > - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated review artifact from the working branch > - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes > - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs ## What Changed - Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test isolation. - Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized Claude/company-import related assertions. - Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models. - Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect `chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing. - Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts` from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests. - `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file, 3 tests. - `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh && scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected `chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them. - `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed. - `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance -- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test. - Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Risks - Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests are scheduled. - Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that artifact before merge. - No database migrations. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior; the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation from the source branch. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
339 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
339 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
list: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
approve: vi.fn(),
|
|
reject: vi.fn(),
|
|
requestRevision: vi.fn(),
|
|
resubmit: vi.fn(),
|
|
listComments: vi.fn(),
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueApprovalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssuesForApproval: vi.fn(),
|
|
linkManyForApproval: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
approvalService: () => mockApprovalService,
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => mockIssueApprovalService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actorOverrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { approvalRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
import("../routes/approvals.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
...actorOverrides,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", approvalRoutes({} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createAgentApp() {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { approvalRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
import("../routes/approvals.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "api_key",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", approvalRoutes({} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("approval routes idempotent retries", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/approvals.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockApprovalService.list.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.create.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.approve.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.reject.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.requestRevision.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.resubmit.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.listComments.mockReset();
|
|
mockApprovalService.addComment.mockReset();
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockReset();
|
|
mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval.mockReset();
|
|
mockIssueApprovalService.linkManyForApproval.mockReset();
|
|
mockSecretService.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence.mockReset();
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockReset();
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue({ id: "wake-1" });
|
|
mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval.mockResolvedValue([{ id: "issue-1" }]);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not emit duplicate approval side effects when approve is already resolved", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "approved",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
});
|
|
mockApprovalService.approve.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
approval: {
|
|
id: "approval-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "approved",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
},
|
|
applied: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-1/approve")
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockIssueApprovalService.listIssuesForApproval).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not emit duplicate rejection logs when reject is already resolved", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
mockApprovalService.reject.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
approval: {
|
|
id: "approval-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
},
|
|
applied: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-1/reject")
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects approval decisions for companies outside the caller scope", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-2",
|
|
companyId: "company-2",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-2/approve")
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockApprovalService.approve).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects approval revision requests for companies outside the caller scope", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-3",
|
|
companyId: "company-2",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-3/request-revision")
|
|
.send({ decisionNote: "Need changes" });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockApprovalService.requestRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on approve", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-4",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
requestedByAgentId: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockApprovalService.approve.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
approval: {
|
|
id: "approval-4",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "approved",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
requestedByAgentId: null,
|
|
},
|
|
applied: true,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-4/approve")
|
|
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "ship it" });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockApprovalService.approve).toHaveBeenCalledWith("approval-4", "user-1", "ship it");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on reject", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-5",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
mockApprovalService.reject.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
approval: {
|
|
id: "approval-5",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
},
|
|
applied: true,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-5/reject")
|
|
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "not now" });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockApprovalService.reject).toHaveBeenCalledWith("approval-5", "user-1", "not now");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives approval attribution from the authenticated actor on request revision", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-6",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
mockApprovalService.requestRevision.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-6",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "hire_agent",
|
|
status: "revision_requested",
|
|
payload: {},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post("/api/approvals/approval-6/request-revision")
|
|
.send({ decidedByUserId: "forged-user", decisionNote: "Need changes" });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockApprovalService.requestRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"approval-6",
|
|
"user-1",
|
|
"Need changes",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("lets agents create generic issue-linked board approval requests", async () => {
|
|
mockApprovalService.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "approval-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "request_board_approval",
|
|
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
requestedByUserId: null,
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
payload: { title: "Approve hosting spend" },
|
|
decisionNote: null,
|
|
decidedByUserId: null,
|
|
decidedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-06T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-06T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createAgentApp())
|
|
.post("/api/companies/company-1/approvals")
|
|
.send({
|
|
type: "request_board_approval",
|
|
issueIds: ["00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"],
|
|
payload: { title: "Approve hosting spend" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
|
|
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
type: "request_board_approval",
|
|
requestedByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
requestedByUserId: null,
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(mockSecretService.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockIssueApprovalService.linkManyForApproval).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"approval-1",
|
|
["00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"],
|
|
{ agentId: "agent-1", userId: null },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
actorType: "agent",
|
|
actorId: "agent-1",
|
|
action: "approval.created",
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|