Closes #2412 Related: #2681, #498, #128 ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The Claude Code adapter spawns the `claude` CLI to run agent tasks > - The adapter detects auth mode by checking for `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` — recognizing only "api" and "subscription" modes > - But users running Claude Code via **AWS Bedrock** (`CLAUDE_CODE_USE_BEDROCK=1`) fall through to the "subscription" path > - This causes a misleading "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set; subscription-based auth can be used" message in the environment check > - Additionally, the hello probe passes `--model claude-opus-4-6` which is **not a valid Bedrock model identifier**, causing `400 The provided model identifier is invalid` and a probe failure > - This pull request adds Bedrock auth detection, skips the Anthropic-style `--model` flag for Bedrock, and returns the correct billing type > - The benefit is that Bedrock users get a working environment check and correct cost tracking out of the box --- ## Pain Point Many enterprise teams use **Claude Code through AWS Bedrock** rather than Anthropic's direct API — for compliance, billing consolidation, or VPC requirements. Currently, these users hit a **hard wall during onboarding**: | Problem | Impact | |---|---| | ❌ Adapter environment check **always fails** | Users cannot create their first agent — blocked at step 1 | | ❌ `--model claude-opus-4-6` is **invalid on Bedrock** (requires `us.anthropic.*` format) | Hello probe exits with code 1: `400 The provided model identifier is invalid` | | ❌ Auth shown as _"subscription-based"_ | Misleading — Bedrock is neither subscription nor API-key auth | | ❌ Quota polling hits Anthropic OAuth endpoint | Fails silently for Bedrock users who have no Anthropic subscription | > **Bottom line**: Paperclip is completely unusable for Bedrock users out of the box. ## Why Bedrock Matters AWS Bedrock is a major deployment path for Claude in enterprise environments: - **Enterprise compliance** — data stays within the customer's AWS account and VPC - **Unified billing** — Claude usage appears on the existing AWS invoice, no separate Anthropic billing - **IAM integration** — access controlled through AWS IAM roles and policies - **Regional deployment** — models run in the customer's preferred AWS region Supporting Bedrock unlocks Paperclip for organizations that **cannot** use Anthropic's direct API due to procurement, security, or regulatory constraints. --- ## What Changed - **`execute.ts`**: Added `isBedrockAuth()` helper that checks `CLAUDE_CODE_USE_BEDROCK` and `ANTHROPIC_BEDROCK_BASE_URL` env vars. `resolveClaudeBillingType()` now returns `"metered_api"` for Bedrock. Biller set to `"aws_bedrock"`. Skips `--model` flag when Bedrock is active (Anthropic-style model IDs are invalid on Bedrock; the CLI uses its own configured model). - **`test.ts`**: Environment check now detects Bedrock env vars (from adapter config or server env) and shows `"AWS Bedrock auth detected. Claude will use Bedrock for inference."` instead of the misleading subscription message. Also skips `--model` in the hello probe for Bedrock. - **`quota.ts`**: Early return with `{ ok: true, windows: [] }` when Bedrock is active — Bedrock usage is billed through AWS, not Anthropic's subscription quota system. - **`ui/src/lib/utils.ts`**: Added `"aws_bedrock"` → `"AWS Bedrock"` to `providerDisplayName()` and `quotaSourceDisplayName()`. ## Verification 1. `pnpm -r typecheck` — all packages pass 2. Unit tests added and passing (6/6) 3. Environment check with Bedrock env vars: | | Before | After | |---|---|---| | **Status** | 🔴 Failed | ✅ Passed | | **Auth message** | `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set; subscription-based auth can be used if Claude is logged in.` | `AWS Bedrock auth detected. Claude will use Bedrock for inference.` | | **Hello probe** | `ERROR · Claude hello probe failed.` (exit code 1 — `--model claude-opus-4-6` is invalid on Bedrock) | `INFO · Claude hello probe succeeded.` | | **Screenshot** | <img height="500" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-05 at 8 25 27 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/476431f6-6139-425a-8abc-97875d653657" /> | <img height="500" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-05 at 8 31 58 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d388ce87-c5e6-4574-b8d2-fd8b86135299" /> | 4. Existing API key / subscription paths are completely untouched unless Bedrock env vars are present ## Risks - **Low risk.** All changes are additive — existing "api" and "subscription" code paths are only entered when Bedrock env vars are absent. - When Bedrock is active, the `--model` flag is skipped, so the Paperclip model dropdown selection is ignored in favor of the Claude CLI's own model config. This is intentional since Bedrock requires different model identifiers. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 4.6 (`claude-opus-4-6`, 1M context window) via Claude Code CLI ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .agents/skills | ||
| .claude/skills | ||
| .github | ||
| cli | ||
| doc | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| evals | ||
| packages | ||
| patches | ||
| releases | ||
| report | ||
| scripts | ||
| server | ||
| skills | ||
| tests | ||
| ui | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .mailmap | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| adapter-plugin.md | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| package.json | ||
| pnpm-lock.yaml | ||
| pnpm-workspace.yaml | ||
| README.md | ||
| tsconfig.base.json | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord
What is Paperclip?
Open-source orchestration for zero-human companies
If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track your agents' work and costs from one dashboard.
It looks like a task manager — but under the hood it has org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.
Manage business goals, not pull requests.
| Step | Example | |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Define the goal | "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR." |
| 02 | Hire the team | CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider. |
| 03 | Approve and run | Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard. |
COMING SOON: Clipmart — Download and run entire companies with one click. Browse pre-built company templates — full org structures, agent configs, and skills — and import them into your Paperclip instance in seconds.
| Works with |
OpenClaw |
Claude Code |
Codex |
Cursor |
Bash |
HTTP |
If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.
Paperclip is right for you if
- ✅ You want to build autonomous AI companies
- ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
- ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
- ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
- ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
- ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
- ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone
Features
🔌 Bring Your Own AgentAny agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
🎯 Goal AlignmentEvery task traces back to the company mission. Agents know what to do and why. |
💓 HeartbeatsAgents wake on a schedule, check work, and act. Delegation flows up and down the org chart. |
💰 Cost ControlMonthly budgets per agent. When they hit the limit, they stop. No runaway costs. |
🏢 Multi-CompanyOne deployment, many companies. Complete data isolation. One control plane for your portfolio. |
🎫 Ticket SystemEvery conversation traced. Every decision explained. Full tool-call tracing and immutable audit log. |
🛡️ GovernanceYou're the board. Approve hires, override strategy, pause or terminate any agent — at any time. |
📊 Org ChartHierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description. |
📱 Mobile ReadyMonitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere. |
Problems Paperclip solves
| Without Paperclip | With Paperclip |
|---|---|
| ❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. | ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots. |
| ❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. | ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why. |
| ❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. | ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts. |
| ❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. | ✅ Cost tracking surfaces token budgets and throttles agents when they're out. Management prioritizes with budgets. |
| ❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. | ✅ Heartbeats handle regular work on a schedule. Management supervises. |
| ❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. | ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work. |
Why Paperclip is special
Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.
| Atomic execution. | Task checkout and budget enforcement are atomic, so no double-work and no runaway spend. |
| Persistent agent state. | Agents resume the same task context across heartbeats instead of restarting from scratch. |
| Runtime skill injection. | Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining. |
| Governance with rollback. | Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely. |
| Goal-aware execution. | Tasks carry full goal ancestry so agents consistently see the "why," not just a title. |
| Portable company templates. | Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling. |
| True multi-company isolation. | Every entity is company-scoped, so one deployment can run many companies with separate data and audit trails. |
What Paperclip is not
| Not a chatbot. | Agents have jobs, not chat windows. |
| Not an agent framework. | We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them. |
| Not a workflow builder. | No drag-and-drop pipelines. Paperclip models companies — with org charts, goals, budgets, and governance. |
| Not a prompt manager. | Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in. |
| Not a single-agent tool. | This is for teams. If you have one agent, you probably don't need Paperclip. If you have twenty — you definitely do. |
| Not a code review tool. | Paperclip orchestrates work, not pull requests. Bring your own review process. |
Quickstart
Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required.
npx paperclipai onboard --yes
If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use paperclipai configure to edit settings.
Or manually:
git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev
This starts the API server at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.
Requirements: Node.js 20+, pnpm 9.15+
FAQ
What does a typical setup look like? Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.
If you're a solo-entreprenuer you can use Tailscale to access Paperclip on the go. Then later you can deploy to e.g. Vercel when you need it.
Can I run multiple companies? Yes. A single deployment can run an unlimited number of companies with complete data isolation.
How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code? Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.
Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello? Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.
(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)
Do agents run continuously? By default, agents run on scheduled heartbeats and event-based triggers (task assignment, @-mentions). You can also hook in continuous agents like OpenClaw. You bring your agent and Paperclip coordinates.
Development
pnpm dev # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server # Server only
pnpm build # Build all
pnpm typecheck # Type checking
pnpm test:run # Run tests
pnpm db:generate # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate # Apply migrations
See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.
Roadmap
- ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
- ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
- ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
- ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
- ✅ Skills Manager
- ✅ Scheduled Routines
- ✅ Better Budgeting
- ⚪ Artifacts & Deployments
- ⚪ CEO Chat
- ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
- ⚪ Multiple Human Users
- ⚪ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e.g. Cursor / e2b agents)
- ⚪ Cloud deployments
- ⚪ Desktop App
Community & Plugins
Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip
Telemetry
Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.
Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Environment variable | PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 |
| Standard convention | DO_NOT_TRACK=1 |
| CI environments | Automatically disabled when CI=true |
| Config file | Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config |
Contributing
We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.
Community
- Discord — Join the community
- GitHub Issues — bugs and feature requests
- GitHub Discussions — ideas and RFC
License
MIT © 2026 Paperclip
Star History
Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to run companies, not babysit agents.