## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Agents query their own inbox via `/agents/me/inbox-lite` to discover
assigned work
> - `issuesSvc.list()` excludes `routine_execution` issues by default,
which is appropriate for the board UI
> - But agents calling `inbox-lite` need to see **all** their assigned
work, including routine-created issues
> - Without `includeRoutineExecutions: true`, agents miss their own
in-progress issues after the first delegation step
> - This causes routine-driven pipelines to stall — agents report "Inbox
empty" and exit
> - This pull request adds `includeRoutineExecutions: true` to the
`inbox-lite` query
> - The benefit is routine-driven pipelines no longer stall after
delegation
## What Changed
- Added `includeRoutineExecutions: true` to the `issuesSvc.list()` call
in the `/agents/me/inbox-lite` route (`server/src/routes/agents.ts`)
## Verification
1. Create a routine that assigns an issue to an agent
2. Trigger the routine — first run works via `issue_assigned` event
injection
3. Agent delegates (creates a subtask) and exits
4. On next heartbeat, agent queries `inbox-lite`
5. **Before fix**: issue is invisible, agent reports "Inbox empty"
6. **After fix**: issue appears in inbox, agent continues working
Tested on production instance — fix resolves the stall immediately.
## Risks
Low risk — additive change, only affects agent-facing inbox endpoint.
Board UI keeps its default behavior (routine executions hidden for clean
view).
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.6 (`claude-opus-4-6`) via Claude Code CLI — high thinking
effort, tool use.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Closes#3282
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle
semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep
regressions visible
> - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime
correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area
> - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused
issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch
overlapping issue APIs
> - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat,
telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch
> - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness
work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit
comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting
## What Changed
- Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review
stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded
execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and
blocked-to-todo wake resumption
- Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads,
compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and
capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces
- Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on
task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material
- Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster
route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation
from local state, and repo verification follow-ups
- Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small
follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were
dropped during branch reconstruction
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts`
- `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted
on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported
init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they
are noted as environment-limited
## Risks
- Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and
reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow
rather than isolated UI polish
- Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should
pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure
modes and not just reshaping harness behavior
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - That operator experience depends not just on issue chat, but also on
how workspaces, inbox groups, and navigation state behave over
long-running sessions
> - The current branch included a separate cluster of workspace-runtime
controls, inbox grouping, sidebar ordering, and worktree lifecycle fixes
> - Those changes cross server, shared contracts, database state, and UI
navigation, but they still form one coherent operator workflow area
> - This pull request isolates the workspace/runtime and navigation
ergonomics work into one standalone branch
> - The benefit is better workspace recovery and navigation persistence
without forcing reviewers through the unrelated issue-detail/chat work
## What Changed
- Improved execution workspace and project workspace controls, request
wiring, layout, and JSON editor ergonomics
- Hardened linked worktree reuse/startup behavior and documented the
`worktree repair` flow for recovering linked worktrees safely
- Added inbox workspace grouping, mobile collapse, archive undo,
keyboard navigation, shared group-header styling, and persisted
collapsed-group behavior
- Added persistent sidebar order preferences with the supporting DB
migration, shared/server contracts, routes, services, hooks, and UI
integration
- Scoped issue-list preferences by context and added targeted UI/server
tests for workspace controls, inbox behavior, sidebar preferences, and
worktree validation
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx
ui/src/components/ProjectWorkspaceSummaryCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx
ui/src/api/workspace-runtime-control.test.ts`
- `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` was attempted, but
the embedded Postgres suite self-skipped/hung on this host after
reporting an init-script issue, so it is not counted as a local pass
here
## Risks
- Medium: this branch includes migration-backed preference storage plus
worktree/runtime behavior, so merge review should pay attention to state
persistence and worktree recovery semantics
- The sidebar preference migration is standalone, but it should still be
watched for conflicts if another migration lands first
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A core part of that is the operator experience around reading issue
state, agent chat, and sub-task structure
> - The current branch had a long run of issue-detail and issue-list UX
fixes that all improve how humans follow and steer active work
> - Those changes mostly live in the UI/chat surface and should be
reviewed together instead of mixed with workspace/runtime work
> - This pull request packages the issue-detail, chat, markdown, and
sub-issue list improvements into one standalone change
> - The benefit is a cleaner, less jumpy, more reliable issue workflow
on desktop and mobile without coupling it to unrelated server/runtime
refactors
## What Changed
- Stabilized issue chat runtime wiring, optimistic comment handling,
queued-comment cancellation, and composer anchoring during live updates
- Fixed several issue-detail rendering and navigation regressions
including placeholder bleed, local polling scope, mobile inbox-to-issue
transitions, and visible refresh resets
- Improved markdown and rich-content handling with advisory image
normalization, editor fallback behavior, touch mention recovery, and
`issue:` quicklook links
- Refined sub-issue behavior with parent-derived defaults, current-user
inheritance fixes, empty-state cleanup, and a reusable issue-list
presentation for sub-issues
- Added targeted UI tests for the new issue-detail, chat scroll/message,
placeholder-data, markdown, and issue-list behaviors
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-scroll.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts
ui/src/lib/query-placeholder-data.test.tsx
ui/src/hooks/usePaperclipIssueRuntime.test.tsx`
## Risks
- Medium: this branch touches the highest-traffic issue-detail UI paths,
so regressions would show up as chat/thread or sub-issue UX glitches
- The changes are UI-heavy and would benefit from reviewer screenshots
or a quick manual browser pass before merge
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Summary
- Adds release notes for v2026.410.0 security release covering
GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7
- Required before triggering the stable release workflow to publish
2026.410.0 to npm
## Context
The security advisory GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 was published on 2026-04-10
listing 2026.410.0 as the patched version, but only canary builds exist
on npm. The authz fix (PR #3315) is already merged to master. This PR
adds release notes so the stable release workflow can be triggered.
## Test plan
- Verify release notes content is accurate
- Merge, then trigger release.yml workflow_dispatch with
source_ref=master, stable_date=2026-04-10, dry_run=false
- Confirm npm view paperclipai version returns 2026.410.0
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Summary
- Adds comprehensive release notes for `v2026.410.0`, the security
release that patches GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 (unauthenticated RCE via import
authorization bypass)
- Required before triggering the stable release workflow to publish
`2026.410.0` to npm and create the GitHub Release
## Context
The security fix (PR #3315) is already merged to master. The GHSA
advisory references `2026.410.0` as the patched version, but only canary
builds exist on npm. This PR unblocks the stable release.
## Test plan
- [x] Release notes file is valid markdown
- [ ] Merge and trigger `release.yml` workflow with `source_ref=master`,
`stable_date=2026-04-10`
- [ ] Verify `npm view paperclipai version` returns `2026.410.0`
- [ ] Verify GitHub Release `v2026.410.0` exists
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Board users and agents collaborate on issue-scoped documents such as
plans and revisions need to be trustworthy because they are the audit
trail for those artifacts.
> - The issue document UI now supports revision history and restore, so
the UI has to distinguish the current revision from historical revisions
correctly even while multiple queries are refreshing.
> - In `PAPA-72`, the newest content could appear under an older
revision label because the current document snapshot and the
revision-history query could temporarily disagree after an edit.
> - That made the UI treat the newest revision like a historical restore
target, which is the opposite of the intended behavior.
> - This pull request derives one authoritative revision view from both
sources, sorts revisions newest-first, and keeps the freshest revision
marked current.
> - The benefit is that revision history stays stable and trustworthy
immediately after edits instead of briefly presenting the newest content
as an older revision.
## What Changed
- Added a `document-revisions` helper that merges the current document
snapshot with fetched revision history into one normalized revision
state.
- Updated `IssueDocumentsSection` to render from that normalized state
instead of trusting either query in isolation.
- Added focused tests covering the current-revision selection and
ordering behavior.
## Verification
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- Targeted revision tests passed locally.
- Manual reviewer check:
- Open an issue document with revision history.
- Edit and save the document.
- Immediately open the revision selector.
- Confirm the newest revision remains marked current and older revisions
remain the restore targets.
## Risks
- Low risk. The change is isolated to issue document revision
presentation in the UI.
- Main risk is merging the current snapshot with fetched history
incorrectly for edge cases, which is why the helper has focused unit
coverage.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The company import/export e2e exercises the local CLI startup path
that boots the dev server inside a workspace
> - That startup path loads server and plugin code which depends on
built workspace package artifacts such as `@paperclipai/shared` and
`@paperclipai/plugin-sdk`
> - In a clean worktree those `dist/*` artifacts may not exist yet even
though `paperclipai run` can still attempt to import the local server
entry
> - That mismatch caused the import/export e2e to fail before the actual
company package flow ran
> - This pull request adds a CLI preflight step that prepares the needed
workspace build dependencies before the local server import and fails
closed if that preflight is interrupted or stalls
> - The benefit is that clean worktrees can boot `paperclipai run`
reliably without silently continuing after incomplete dependency
preparation
## What Changed
- Updated `cli/src/commands/run.ts` to execute
`scripts/ensure-plugin-build-deps.mjs` before importing
`server/src/index.ts` for local dev startup.
- Ensured `paperclipai run` can materialize missing workspace artifacts
such as `packages/shared/dist` and `packages/plugins/sdk/dist`
automatically in clean worktrees.
- Made the preflight fail closed when the child process exits via signal
and bounded it with a 120-second timeout so the CLI does not hang
indefinitely.
- Kept the fix isolated to the CLI startup path; no API contract,
schema, or UI behavior changed.
- Reused the existing
`cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts` coverage that
already exercises the failing boot path, so no additional test file was
needed.
## Verification
- `pnpm test:run cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter paperclipai typecheck`
- On the isolated branch, confirmed `packages/shared/dist/index.js` and
`packages/plugins/sdk/dist/index.js` were absent before the run, then
reran the targeted e2e and observed a passing result.
## Risks
- Low risk: the change only affects the local CLI dev startup path
before the server import.
- Residual risk: other entrypoints still rely on their own
preflight/build behavior, so this does not normalize every workspace
startup path.
- The 120-second timeout is intentionally generous, but unusually slow
machines could still hit it and surface a startup error instead of
waiting forever.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment,
with shell/tool execution enabled. The exact runtime revision and
context window are not exposed by this environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
